| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
All normal kernel memory is "TDX private memory". This includes
everything from kernel stacks to kernel text. Handling
exceptions on arbitrary accesses to kernel memory is essentially
impossible because they can happen in horribly nasty places like
kernel entry/exit. But, TDX hardware can theoretically _deliver_
a virtualization exception (#VE) on any access to private memory.
But, it's not as bad as it sounds. TDX can be configured to never
deliver these exceptions on private memory with a "TD attribute"
called ATTR_SEPT_VE_DISABLE. The guest has no way to *set* this
attribute, but it can check it.
Ensure ATTR_SEPT_VE_DISABLE is set in early boot. panic() if it
is unset. There is no sane way for Linux to run with this
attribute clear so a panic() is appropriate.
There's small window during boot before the check where kernel
has an early #VE handler. But the handler is only for port I/O
and will also panic() as soon as it sees any other #VE, such as
a one generated by a private memory access.
[ dhansen: Rewrite changelog and rebase on new tdx_parse_tdinfo().
Add Kirill's tested-by because I made changes since
he wrote this. ]
Fixes: 9a22bf6debbf ("x86/traps: Add #VE support for TDX guest")
Reported-by: ruogui.ygr@alibaba-inc.com
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221028141220.29217-3-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
|
|
The TDG.VP.INFO TDCALL provides the guest with various details about
the TDX system that the guest needs to run. Only one field is currently
used: 'gpa_width' which tells the guest which PTE bits mark pages shared
or private.
A second field is now needed: the guest "TD attributes" to tell if
virtualization exceptions are configured in a way that can harm the guest.
Make the naming and calling convention more generic and discrete from the
mask-centric one.
Thanks to Sathya for the inspiration here, but there's no code, comments
or changelogs left from where he started.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
|
load_unaligned_zeropad() can lead to unwanted loads across page boundaries.
The unwanted loads are typically harmless. But, they might be made to
totally unrelated or even unmapped memory. load_unaligned_zeropad()
relies on exception fixup (#PF, #GP and now #VE) to recover from these
unwanted loads.
In TDX guests, the second page can be shared page and a VMM may configure
it to trigger #VE.
The kernel assumes that #VE on a shared page is an MMIO access and tries to
decode instruction to handle it. In case of load_unaligned_zeropad() it
may result in confusion as it is not MMIO access.
Fix it by detecting split page MMIO accesses and failing them.
load_unaligned_zeropad() will recover using exception fixups.
The issue was discovered by analysis and reproduced artificially. It was
not triggered during testing.
[ dhansen: fix up changelogs and comments for grammar and clarity,
plus incorporate Kirill's off-by-one fix]
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614120135.14812-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
After successful #VE handling, tdx_handle_virt_exception() has to move
RIP to the next instruction. The handler needs to know the length of the
instruction.
If the #VE happened due to instruction execution, the GET_VEINFO TDX
module call provides info on the instruction in R10, including its length.
For #VE due to EPT violation, the info in R10 is not populand and the
kernel must decode the instruction manually to find out its length.
Restructure the code to make it explicit that the instruction length
depends on the type of #VE. Make individual #VE handlers return
the instruction length on success or -errno on failure.
[ dhansen: fix up changelog and comments ]
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614120135.14812-3-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
tdx_early_handle_ve() does not increment RIP after successfully
handling the exception. That leads to infinite loop of exceptions.
Move RIP when exceptions are successfully handled.
[ dhansen: make problem statement more clear ]
Fixes: 32e72854fa5f ("x86/tdx: Port I/O: Add early boot support")
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614120135.14812-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull Intel TDX support from Borislav Petkov:
"Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) support.
This is the Intel version of a confidential computing solution called
Trust Domain Extensions (TDX). This series adds support to run the
kernel as part of a TDX guest. It provides similar guest protections
to AMD's SEV-SNP like guest memory and register state encryption,
memory integrity protection and a lot more.
Design-wise, it differs from AMD's solution considerably: it uses a
software module which runs in a special CPU mode called (Secure
Arbitration Mode) SEAM. As the name suggests, this module serves as
sort of an arbiter which the confidential guest calls for services it
needs during its lifetime.
Just like AMD's SNP set, this series reworks and streamlines certain
parts of x86 arch code so that this feature can be properly
accomodated"
* tag 'x86_tdx_for_v5.19_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (34 commits)
x86/tdx: Fix RETs in TDX asm
x86/tdx: Annotate a noreturn function
x86/mm: Fix spacing within memory encryption features message
x86/kaslr: Fix build warning in KASLR code in boot stub
Documentation/x86: Document TDX kernel architecture
ACPICA: Avoid cache flush inside virtual machines
x86/tdx/ioapic: Add shared bit for IOAPIC base address
x86/mm: Make DMA memory shared for TD guest
x86/mm/cpa: Add support for TDX shared memory
x86/tdx: Make pages shared in ioremap()
x86/topology: Disable CPU online/offline control for TDX guests
x86/boot: Avoid #VE during boot for TDX platforms
x86/boot: Set CR0.NE early and keep it set during the boot
x86/acpi/x86/boot: Add multiprocessor wake-up support
x86/boot: Add a trampoline for booting APs via firmware handoff
x86/tdx: Wire up KVM hypercalls
x86/tdx: Port I/O: Add early boot support
x86/tdx: Port I/O: Add runtime hypercalls
x86/boot: Port I/O: Add decompression-time support for TDX
x86/boot: Port I/O: Allow to hook up alternative helpers
...
|
|
Because build-testing is over-rated, fix a few trivial objtool complaints:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_module_call+0x3e: missing int3 after ret
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_hypercall+0x6e: missing int3 after ret
Fixes: eb94f1b6a70a ("x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220520083839.GR2578@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
|
|
objdump complains:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_hypercall()+0x74: unreachable instruction
because __tdx_hypercall_failed() won't return but panic the guest.
Annotate that that is ok and desired.
Fixes: eb94f1b6a70a ("x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions")
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220420115025.5448-1-bp@alien8.de
|
|
Intel TDX doesn't allow VMM to directly access guest private memory.
Any memory that is required for communication with the VMM must be
shared explicitly. The same rule applies for any DMA to and from the
TDX guest. All DMA pages have to be marked as shared pages. A generic way
to achieve this without any changes to device drivers is to use the
SWIOTLB framework.
The previous patch ("Add support for TDX shared memory") gave TDX guests
the _ability_ to make some pages shared, but did not make any pages
shared. This actually marks SWIOTLB buffers *as* shared.
Start returning true for cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT) in
TDX guests. This has several implications:
- Allows the existing mem_encrypt_init() to be used for TDX which
sets SWIOTLB buffers shared (aka. "decrypted").
- Ensures that all DMA is routed via the SWIOTLB mechanism (see
pci_swiotlb_detect())
Stop selecting DYNAMIC_PHYSICAL_MASK directly. It will get set
indirectly by selecting X86_MEM_ENCRYPT.
mem_encrypt_init() is currently under an AMD-specific #ifdef. Move it to
a generic area of the header.
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-28-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Intel TDX protects guest memory from VMM access. Any memory that is
required for communication with the VMM must be explicitly shared.
It is a two-step process: the guest sets the shared bit in the page
table entry and notifies VMM about the change. The notification happens
using MapGPA hypercall.
Conversion back to private memory requires clearing the shared bit,
notifying VMM with MapGPA hypercall following with accepting the memory
with AcceptPage hypercall.
Provide a TDX version of x86_platform.guest.* callbacks. It makes
__set_memory_enc_pgtable() work right in TDX guest.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-27-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Unlike regular VMs, TDX guests use the firmware hand-off wakeup method
to wake up the APs during the boot process. This wakeup model uses a
mailbox to communicate with firmware to bring up the APs. As per the
design, this mailbox can only be used once for the given AP, which means
after the APs are booted, the same mailbox cannot be used to
offline/online the given AP. More details about this requirement can be
found in Intel TDX Virtual Firmware Design Guide, sec titled "AP
initialization in OS" and in sec titled "Hotplug Device".
Since the architecture does not support any method of offlining the
CPUs, disable CPU hotplug support in the kernel.
Since this hotplug disable feature can be re-used by other VM guests,
add a new CC attribute CC_ATTR_HOTPLUG_DISABLED and use it to disable
the hotplug support.
Attempt to offline CPU will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP.
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-25-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
KVM hypercalls use the VMCALL or VMMCALL instructions. Although the ABI
is similar, those instructions no longer function for TDX guests.
Make vendor-specific TDVMCALLs instead of VMCALL. This enables TDX
guests to run with KVM acting as the hypervisor.
Among other things, KVM hypercall is used to send IPIs.
Since the KVM driver can be built as a kernel module, export
tdx_kvm_hypercall() to make the symbols visible to kvm.ko.
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-20-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
TDX guests cannot do port I/O directly. The TDX module triggers a #VE
exception to let the guest kernel emulate port I/O by converting them
into TDCALLs to call the host.
But before IDT handlers are set up, port I/O cannot be emulated using
normal kernel #VE handlers. To support the #VE-based emulation during
this boot window, add a minimal early #VE handler support in early
exception handlers. This is similar to what AMD SEV does. This is
mainly to support earlyprintk's serial driver, as well as potentially
the VGA driver.
The early handler only supports I/O-related #VE exceptions. Unhandled or
failed exceptions will be handled via early_fixup_exceptions() (like
normal exception failures). At runtime I/O-related #VE exceptions (along
with other types) handled by virt_exception_kernel().
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-19-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
TDX hypervisors cannot emulate instructions directly. This includes
port I/O which is normally emulated in the hypervisor. All port I/O
instructions inside TDX trigger the #VE exception in the guest and
would be normally emulated there.
Use a hypercall to emulate port I/O. Extend the
tdx_handle_virt_exception() and add support to handle the #VE due to
port I/O instructions.
String I/O operations are not supported in TDX. Unroll them by declaring
CC_ATTR_GUEST_UNROLL_STRING_IO confidential computing attribute.
== Userspace Implications ==
The ioperm() facility allows userspace access to I/O instructions like
inb/outb. Among other things, this allows writing userspace device
drivers.
This series has no special handling for ioperm(). Users will be able to
successfully request I/O permissions but will induce a #VE on their
first I/O instruction which leads SIGSEGV. If this is undesirable users
can enable kernel lockdown feature with 'lockdown=integrity' kernel
command line option. It makes ioperm() fail.
More robust handling of this situation (denying ioperm() in all TDX
guests) will be addressed in follow-on work.
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-18-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
In non-TDX VMs, MMIO is implemented by providing the guest a mapping
which will cause a VMEXIT on access and then the VMM emulating the
instruction that caused the VMEXIT. That's not possible for TDX VM.
To emulate an instruction an emulator needs two things:
- R/W access to the register file to read/modify instruction arguments
and see RIP of the faulted instruction.
- Read access to memory where instruction is placed to see what to
emulate. In this case it is guest kernel text.
Both of them are not available to VMM in TDX environment:
- Register file is never exposed to VMM. When a TD exits to the module,
it saves registers into the state-save area allocated for that TD.
The module then scrubs these registers before returning execution
control to the VMM, to help prevent leakage of TD state.
- TDX does not allow guests to execute from shared memory. All executed
instructions are in TD-private memory. Being private to the TD, VMMs
have no way to access TD-private memory and no way to read the
instruction to decode and emulate it.
In TDX the MMIO regions are instead configured by VMM to trigger a #VE
exception in the guest.
Add #VE handling that emulates the MMIO instruction inside the guest and
converts it into a controlled hypercall to the host.
This approach is bad for performance. But, it has (virtually) no impact
on the size of the kernel image and will work for a wide variety of
drivers. This allows TDX deployments to use arbitrary devices and device
drivers, including virtio. TDX customers have asked for the capability
to use random devices in their deployments.
In other words, even if all of the work was done to paravirtualize all
x86 MMIO users and virtio, this approach would still be needed. There
is essentially no way to get rid of this code.
This approach is functional for all in-kernel MMIO users current and
future and does so with a minimal amount of code and kernel image bloat.
MMIO addresses can be used with any CPU instruction that accesses
memory. Address only MMIO accesses done via io.h helpers, such as
'readl()' or 'writeq()'.
Any CPU instruction that accesses memory can also be used to access
MMIO. However, by convention, MMIO access are typically performed via
io.h helpers such as 'readl()' or 'writeq()'.
The io.h helpers intentionally use a limited set of instructions when
accessing MMIO. This known, limited set of instructions makes MMIO
instruction decoding and emulation feasible in KVM hosts and SEV guests
today.
MMIO accesses performed without the io.h helpers are at the mercy of the
compiler. Compilers can and will generate a much more broad set of
instructions which can not practically be decoded and emulated. TDX
guests will oops if they encounter one of these decoding failures.
This means that TDX guests *must* use the io.h helpers to access MMIO.
This requirement is not new. Both KVM hosts and AMD SEV guests have the
same limitations on MMIO access.
=== Potential alternative approaches ===
== Paravirtualizing all MMIO ==
An alternative to letting MMIO induce a #VE exception is to avoid
the #VE in the first place. Similar to the port I/O case, it is
theoretically possible to paravirtualize MMIO accesses.
Like the exception-based approach offered here, a fully paravirtualized
approach would be limited to MMIO users that leverage common
infrastructure like the io.h macros.
However, any paravirtual approach would be patching approximately 120k
call sites. Any paravirtual approach would need to replace a bare memory
access instruction with (at least) a function call. With a conservative
overhead estimation of 5 bytes per call site (CALL instruction),
it leads to bloating code by 600k.
Many drivers will never be used in the TDX environment and the bloat
cannot be justified.
== Patching TDX drivers ==
Rather than touching the entire kernel, it might also be possible to
just go after drivers that use MMIO in TDX guests *and* are performance
critical to justify the effrort. Right now, that's limited only to virtio.
All virtio MMIO appears to be done through a single function, which
makes virtio eminently easy to patch.
This approach will be adopted in the future, removing the bulk of
MMIO #VEs. The #VE-based MMIO will remain serving non-virtio use cases.
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-12-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
In TDX guests, most CPUID leaf/sub-leaf combinations are virtualized
by the TDX module while some trigger #VE.
Implement the #VE handling for EXIT_REASON_CPUID by handing it through
the hypercall, which in turn lets the TDX module handle it by invoking
the host VMM.
More details on CPUID Virtualization can be found in the TDX module
specification, the section titled "CPUID Virtualization".
Note that VMM that handles the hypercall is not trusted. It can return
data that may steer the guest kernel in wrong direct. Only allow VMM
to control range reserved for hypervisor communication.
Return all-zeros for any CPUID outside the hypervisor range. It matches
CPU behaviour for non-supported leaf.
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-11-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Use hypercall to emulate MSR read/write for the TDX platform.
There are two viable approaches for doing MSRs in a TD guest:
1. Execute the RDMSR/WRMSR instructions like most VMs and bare metal
do. Some will succeed, others will cause a #VE. All of those that
cause a #VE will be handled with a TDCALL.
2. Use paravirt infrastructure. The paravirt hook has to keep a list
of which MSRs would cause a #VE and use a TDCALL. All other MSRs
execute RDMSR/WRMSR instructions directly.
The second option can be ruled out because the list of MSRs was
challenging to maintain. That leaves option #1 as the only viable
solution for the minimal TDX support.
Kernel relies on the exception fixup machinery to handle MSR access
errors. #VE handler uses the same exception fixup code as #GP. It
covers MSR accesses along with other types of fixups.
For performance-critical MSR writes (like TSC_DEADLINE), future patches
will replace the WRMSR/#VE sequence with the direct TDCALL.
RDMSR and WRMSR specification details can be found in
Guest-Host-Communication Interface (GHCI) for Intel Trust Domain
Extensions (Intel TDX) specification, sec titled "TDG.VP.
VMCALL<Instruction.RDMSR>" and "TDG.VP.VMCALL<Instruction.WRMSR>".
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-10-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
The HLT instruction is a privileged instruction, executing it stops
instruction execution and places the processor in a HALT state. It
is used in kernel for cases like reboot, idle loop and exception fixup
handlers. For the idle case, interrupts will be enabled (using STI)
before the HLT instruction (this is also called safe_halt()).
To support the HLT instruction in TDX guests, it needs to be emulated
using TDVMCALL (hypercall to VMM). More details about it can be found
in Intel Trust Domain Extensions (Intel TDX) Guest-Host-Communication
Interface (GHCI) specification, section TDVMCALL[Instruction.HLT].
In TDX guests, executing HLT instruction will generate a #VE, which is
used to emulate the HLT instruction. But #VE based emulation will not
work for the safe_halt() flavor, because it requires STI instruction to
be executed just before the TDCALL. Since idle loop is the only user of
safe_halt() variant, handle it as a special case.
To avoid *safe_halt() call in the idle function, define the
tdx_guest_idle() and use it to override the "x86_idle" function pointer
for a valid TDX guest.
Alternative choices like PV ops have been considered for adding
safe_halt() support. But it was rejected because HLT paravirt calls
only exist under PARAVIRT_XXL, and enabling it in TDX guest just for
safe_halt() use case is not worth the cost.
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-9-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Virtualization Exceptions (#VE) are delivered to TDX guests due to
specific guest actions which may happen in either user space or the
kernel:
* Specific instructions (WBINVD, for example)
* Specific MSR accesses
* Specific CPUID leaf accesses
* Access to specific guest physical addresses
Syscall entry code has a critical window where the kernel stack is not
yet set up. Any exception in this window leads to hard to debug issues
and can be exploited for privilege escalation. Exceptions in the NMI
entry code also cause issues. Returning from the exception handler with
IRET will re-enable NMIs and nested NMI will corrupt the NMI stack.
For these reasons, the kernel avoids #VEs during the syscall gap and
the NMI entry code. Entry code paths do not access TD-shared memory,
MMIO regions, use #VE triggering MSRs, instructions, or CPUID leaves
that might generate #VE. VMM can remove memory from TD at any point,
but access to unaccepted (or missing) private memory leads to VM
termination, not to #VE.
Similarly to page faults and breakpoints, #VEs are allowed in NMI
handlers once the kernel is ready to deal with nested NMIs.
During #VE delivery, all interrupts, including NMIs, are blocked until
TDGETVEINFO is called. It prevents #VE nesting until the kernel reads
the VE info.
TDGETVEINFO retrieves the #VE info from the TDX module, which also
clears the "#VE valid" flag. This must be done before anything else as
any #VE that occurs while the valid flag is set escalates to #DF by TDX
module. It will result in an oops.
Virtual NMIs are inhibited if the #VE valid flag is set. NMI will not be
delivered until TDGETVEINFO is called.
For now, convert unhandled #VE's (everything, until later in this
series) so that they appear just like a #GP by calling the
ve_raise_fault() directly. The ve_raise_fault() function is similar
to #GP handler and is responsible for sending SIGSEGV to userspace
and CPU die and notifying debuggers and other die chain users.
Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-8-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
In TDX guests, by default memory is protected from host access. If a
guest needs to communicate with the VMM (like the I/O use case), it uses
a single bit in the physical address to communicate the protected/shared
attribute of the given page.
In the x86 ARCH code, __PHYSICAL_MASK macro represents the width of the
physical address in the given architecture. It is used in creating
physical PAGE_MASK for address bits in the kernel. Since in TDX guest,
a single bit is used as metadata, it needs to be excluded from valid
physical address bits to avoid using incorrect addresses bits in the
kernel.
Enable DYNAMIC_PHYSICAL_MASK to support updating the __PHYSICAL_MASK.
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-6-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Confidential Computing (CC) features (like string I/O unroll support,
memory encryption/decryption support, etc) are conditionally enabled
in the kernel using cc_platform_has() API. Since TDX guests also need
to use these CC features, extend cc_platform_has() API and add TDX
guest-specific CC attributes support.
CC API also provides an interface to deal with encryption mask. Extend
it to cover TDX.
Details about which bit in the page table entry to be used to indicate
shared/private state is determined by using the TDINFO TDCALL.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-5-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Guests communicate with VMMs with hypercalls. Historically, these
are implemented using instructions that are known to cause VMEXITs
like VMCALL, VMLAUNCH, etc. However, with TDX, VMEXITs no longer
expose the guest state to the host. This prevents the old hypercall
mechanisms from working. So, to communicate with VMM, TDX
specification defines a new instruction called TDCALL.
In a TDX based VM, since the VMM is an untrusted entity, an intermediary
layer -- TDX module -- facilitates secure communication between the host
and the guest. TDX module is loaded like a firmware into a special CPU
mode called SEAM. TDX guests communicate with the TDX module using the
TDCALL instruction.
A guest uses TDCALL to communicate with both the TDX module and VMM.
The value of the RAX register when executing the TDCALL instruction is
used to determine the TDCALL type. A leaf of TDCALL used to communicate
with the VMM is called TDVMCALL.
Add generic interfaces to communicate with the TDX module and VMM
(using the TDCALL instruction).
__tdx_module_call() - Used to communicate with the TDX module (via
TDCALL instruction).
__tdx_hypercall() - Used by the guest to request services from
the VMM (via TDVMCALL leaf of TDCALL).
Also define an additional wrapper _tdx_hypercall(), which adds error
handling support for the TDCALL failure.
The __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions are
implemented in assembly in a .S file. The TDCALL ABI requires
shuffling arguments in and out of registers, which proved to be
awkward with inline assembly.
Just like syscalls, not all TDVMCALL use cases need to use the same
number of argument registers. The implementation here picks the current
worst-case scenario for TDCALL (4 registers). For TDCALLs with fewer
than 4 arguments, there will end up being a few superfluous (cheap)
instructions. But, this approach maximizes code reuse.
For registers used by the TDCALL instruction, please check TDX GHCI
specification, the section titled "TDCALL instruction" and "TDG.VP.VMCALL
Interface".
Based on previous patch by Sean Christopherson.
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
In preparation of extending cc_platform_has() API to support TDX guest,
use CPUID instruction to detect support for TDX guests in the early
boot code (via tdx_early_init()). Since copy_bootdata() is the first
user of cc_platform_has() API, detect the TDX guest status before it.
Define a synthetic feature flag (X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST) and set this
bit in a valid TDX guest platform.
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
The CC_ATTR_GUEST_SEV_SNP can be used by the guest to query whether the
SNP (Secure Nested Paging) feature is active.
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220307213356.2797205-10-brijesh.singh@amd.com
|
|
AMD SME/SEV uses a bit in the page table entries to indicate that the
page is encrypted and not accessible to the VMM.
TDX uses a similar approach, but the polarity of the mask is opposite to
AMD: if the bit is set the page is accessible to VMM.
Provide vendor-neutral API to deal with the mask: cc_mkenc() and
cc_mkdec() modify given address to make it encrypted/decrypted. It can
be applied to phys_addr_t, pgprotval_t or page table entry value.
pgprot_encrypted() and pgprot_decrypted() reimplemented using new
helpers.
The implementation will be extended to cover TDX.
pgprot_decrypted() is used by drivers (i915, virtio_gpu, vfio).
cc_mkdec() called by pgprot_decrypted(). Export cc_mkdec().
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220222185740.26228-5-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
The kernel derives the confidential computing platform
type it is running as from sme_me_mask on AMD or by using
hv_is_isolation_supported() on HyperV isolation VMs. This detection
process will be more complicated as more platforms get added.
Declare a confidential computing vendor variable explicitly and set it
via cc_set_vendor() on the respective platform.
[ bp: Massage commit message, fixup HyperV check. ]
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220222185740.26228-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Move cc_platform.c to arch/x86/coco/. The directory is going to be the
home space for code related to confidential computing.
Intel TDX code will land here. AMD SEV code will also eventually be
moved there.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220222185740.26228-3-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
