| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed()/acpi_evaluate_dsm() should be coupled
with ACPI_FREE() to free the ACPI memory, because we need to
track the allocation of acpi_object when ACPI_DBG_TRACK_ALLOCATIONS
enabled, so use ACPI_FREE() instead of kfree().
Fixes: b0013e037a8b ("ACPI: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Telemetry driver")
Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The "data_info" struct is copied to the user. It has a 4 byte struct
hole after the last struct member so we need to memset that to avoid
copying uninitialized stack data to the user.
Fixes: b0013e037a8b ("ACPI: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Telemetry driver")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
This driver allows user space to fetch telemetry data from the
firmware with the help of the Platform Firmware Runtime Telemetry
interface.
Both PFRU and PFRT are based on ACPI _DSM interfaces located under
special device objects in the ACPI Namespace, but these interfaces
are different from each other, so it is better to provide a separate
driver from each of them, even though they share some common
definitions and naming conventions.
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
