summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-02-18cpufreq: davinci: move configuration to include/linux/platform_dataBartosz Golaszewski1-4/+1
The header containing the configuration structure for davinci cpufreq driver lives in mach-davinci/include/mach/. This is fine for now but if we want to make davinci part of the multi_v5 build, no code external to mach-davinci should include machine-specific headers. Move the configuration structure to include/linux/platform_data. While we're at it: convert the GPL-2.0 boilerplate to a proper SPDX license identifier. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2017-01-02ARM: davinci: da850: fix da850_set_pll0rate()Bartosz Golaszewski1-1/+1
This function is confusing - its second argument is an index to the freq table, not the requested clock rate in Hz, but it's used as the set_rate callback for the pll0 clock. It leads to an oops when the caller doesn't know the internals and passes the rate in Hz as argument instead of the cpufreq index since this argument isn't bounds checked either. Fix it by iterating over the array of supported frequencies and selecting a one that matches or returning -EINVAL for unsupported rates. Also: update the davinci cpufreq driver. It's the only user of this clock and currently it passes the cpufreq table index to clk_set_rate(), which is confusing. Make it pass the requested clock rate in Hz. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [nsekhar@ti.com: commit headline update] Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
2016-06-09cpufreq: davinci: Reuse cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify()Viresh Kumar1-21/+1
policy->freq_table will always be valid for this platform, otherwise driver's probe() would fail. And so this routine will *always* return after calling cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(). This can be done using the generic callback provided by core, lets use it instead. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-10-20cpufreq: drop owner assignment from platform_driversWolfram Sang1-1/+0
A platform_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be populated by the driver core. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
2014-03-12cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_generic_exit()Viresh Kumar1-1/+0
cpufreq_generic_exit() is empty now and can be deleted. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-17cpufreq: introduce cpufreq_generic_get() routineViresh Kumar1-10/+4
CPUFreq drivers that use clock frameworks interface,i.e. clk_get_rate(), to get CPUs clk rate, have similar sort of code used in most of them. This patch adds a generic ->get() which will do the same thing for them. All those drivers are required to now is to set .get to cpufreq_generic_get() and set their clk pointer in policy->clk during ->init(). Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-06cpufreq: Mark ARM drivers with CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK flagViresh Kumar1-1/+1
Sometimes boot loaders set CPU frequency to a value outside of frequency table present with cpufreq core. In such cases CPU might be unstable if it has to run on that frequency for long duration of time and so its better to set it to a frequency which is specified in frequency table. On some systems we can't really say what frequency we're running at the moment and so for these we shouldn't check if we are running at a frequency present in frequency table. And so we really can't force this for all the cpufreq drivers. Hence we are created another flag here: CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK that will be marked by platforms which want to go for this check at boot time. Initially this is done for all ARM platforms but others may follow if required. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-31cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq coreViresh Kumar1-20/+10
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for doing this work, work/tasklet/etc.. They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag: CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them. All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as double notification would happen otherwise. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-26cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routineViresh Kumar1-13/+3
Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-16cpufreq: davinci: use cpufreq_generic_init()Viresh Kumar1-9/+1
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-16cpufreq: davinci: don't initialize part of policy set by coreViresh Kumar1-2/+0
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-16cpufreq: davinci: Use generic cpufreq routinesViresh Kumar1-13/+2
Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used by cpufreq drivers then. This patch uses these generic routines in the davinci driver. Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-16cpufreq: add new routine cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits()Viresh Kumar1-3/+1
Most of the users of cpufreq_verify_within_limits() calls it for limiting with min/max from policy->cpuinfo. We can make that code simple by introducing another routine which will do this for them automatically. This patch adds another routine cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits() and updates others to use it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-30cpufreq: davinci: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()Viresh Kumar1-4/+2
Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-24cpufreq: davinci: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error casesViresh Kumar1-0/+3
PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both should be called or both shouldn't be. In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that sequence of calling notifiers is complete. Davinci driver was taking care of it but frequency isn't restored to freqs.old. This patch fixes it. Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2013-04-08cpufreq: davinci: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreqViresh Kumar1-0/+231
This patch moves cpufreq driver of ARM based davinci platform to drivers/cpufreq. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>