summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cxl/mem.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-12-23cxl: Export sysfs attributes for memory device QoS classDave Jiang1-6/+61
Export qos_class sysfs attributes for the CXL memory device. The QoS clas should show up as /sys/bus/cxl/devices/memX/ram/qos_class for the volatile partition and /sys/bus/cxl/devices/memX/pmem/qos_class for the persistent partition. The QTG ID is retrieved via _DSM after supplying the calculated bandwidth and latency for the entire CXL path from device to the CPU. This ID is used to match up to the root decoder QoS class to determine which CFMWS the memory range of a hotplugged CXL mem device should be assigned under. While there may be multiple DSMAS exported by the device CDAT, the driver will only expose the first QTG ID per partition in sysfs for now. In the future when multiple QTG IDs are necessary, they can be exposed. [1] [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/167571650007.587790.10040913293130712882.stgit@djiang5-mobl3.local/T/#md2a47b1ead3e1ba08f50eab29a4af1aed1d215ab Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/170319625698.2212653.17544381274847420961.stgit@djiang5-mobl3 Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2023-10-28cxl/pci: Add RCH downstream port AER register discoveryRobert Richter1-0/+2
Restricted CXL host (RCH) downstream port AER information is not currently logged while in the error state. One problem preventing the error logging is the AER and RAS registers are not accessible. The CXL driver requires changes to find RCH downstream port AER and RAS registers for purpose of error logging. RCH downstream ports are not enumerated during a PCI bus scan and are instead discovered using system firmware, ACPI in this case.[1] The downstream port is implemented as a Root Complex Register Block (RCRB). The RCRB is a 4k memory block containing PCIe registers based on the PCIe root port.[2] The RCRB includes AER extended capability registers used for reporting errors. Note, the RCH's AER Capability is located in the RCRB memory space instead of PCI configuration space, thus its register access is different. Existing kernel PCIe AER functions can not be used to manage the downstream port AER capabilities and RAS registers because the port was not enumerated during PCI scan and the registers are not PCI config accessible. Discover RCH downstream port AER extended capability registers. Use MMIO accesses to search for extended AER capability in RCRB register space. [1] CXL 3.0 Spec, 9.11.2 - System Firmware View of CXL 1.1 Hierarchy [2] CXL 3.0 Spec, 8.2.1.1 - RCH Downstream Port RCRB Co-developed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231018171713.1883517-12-rrichter@amd.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2023-10-28cxl/hdm: Use stored Component Register mappings to map HDM decoder capabilityRobert Richter1-3/+2
Now, that the Component Register mappings are stored, use them to enable and map the HDM decoder capabilities. The Component Registers do not need to be probed again for this, remove probing code. The HDM capability applies to Endpoints, USPs and VH Host Bridges. The Endpoint's component register mappings are located in the cxlds and else in the port's structure. Duplicate the cxlds->reg_map in port->reg_map for endpoint ports. Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> [rework to drop cxl_port_get_comp_map()] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231018171713.1883517-8-rrichter@amd.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2023-06-26Merge branch 'for-6.5/cxl-rch-eh' into for-6.5/cxlDan Williams1-13/+3
Pick up the first half of the RCH error handling series. The back half needs some fixups for test regressions. Small conflicts with the PMU work around register enumeration and setup helpers.
2023-06-26cxl/mbox: Move mailbox related driver state to its own data structureDan Williams1-3/+7
'struct cxl_dev_state' makes too many assumptions about the capabilities of a CXL device. In particular it assumes a CXL device has a mailbox and all of the infrastructure and state that comes along with that. In preparation for supporting accelerator / Type-2 devices that may not have a mailbox and in general maintain a minimal core context structure, make mailbox functionality a super-set of 'struct cxl_dev_state' with 'struct cxl_memdev_state'. With this reorganization it allows for CXL devices that support HDM decoder mapping, but not other general-expander / Type-3 capabilities, to only enable that subset without the rest of the mailbox infrastructure coming along for the ride. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/168679260240.3436160.15520641540463704524.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2023-06-25cxl/pci: Early setup RCH dport component registers from RCRBRobert Richter1-9/+0
CXL RAS capabilities must be enabled and accessible as soon as the CXL endpoint is detected in the PCI hierarchy and bound to the cxl_pci driver. This needs to be independent of other modules such as cxl_port or cxl_mem. CXL RAS capabilities reside in the Component Registers. For an RCH this is determined by probing RCRB which is implemented very late once the CXL Memory Device is created. Change this by moving the RCRB probe to the cxl_pci driver. Do this by using a new introduced function cxl_pci_find_port() similar to cxl_mem_find_port() to determine the involved dport by the endpoint's PCI handle. Plug this into the existing cxl_pci_setup_regs() function to setup Component Registers. Probe the RCRB in case the Component Registers cannot be located through the CXL Register Locator capability. This unifies code and early sets up the Component Registers at the same time for both, VH and RCH mode. Only the cxl_pci driver is involved for this. This allows an early mapping of the CXL RAS capability registers. Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230622205523.85375-14-terry.bowman@amd.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2023-06-25cxl/mem: Prepare for early RCH dport component register setupRobert Richter1-5/+4
In order to move the RCH dport component register setup to cxl_pci the base address must be stored in CXL device state (cxlds) for both modes, RCH and VH. Store it in cxlds->component_reg_phys and use it for endpoint creation. Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230622205523.85375-13-terry.bowman@amd.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2023-06-25cxl: Rename 'uport' to 'uport_dev'Dan Williams1-1/+1
For symmetry with the recent rename of ->dport_dev for a 'struct cxl_dport', add the "_dev" suffix to the ->uport property of a 'struct cxl_port'. These devices represent the downstream-port-device and upstream-port-device respectively in the CXL/PCIe topology. Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230622205523.85375-6-terry.bowman@amd.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2023-06-25cxl/acpi: Probe RCRB later during RCH downstream port creationRobert Richter1-2/+2
The RCRB is extracted already during ACPI CEDT table parsing while the data of this is needed not earlier than dport creation. This implementation comes with drawbacks: During ACPI table scan there is already MMIO access including mapping and unmapping, but only ACPI data should be collected here. The collected data must be transferred through a couple of interfaces until it is finally consumed when creating the dport. This causes complex data structures and function interfaces. Additionally, RCRB parsing will be extended to also extract AER data, it would be much easier do this at a later point during port and dport creation when the data structures are available to hold that data. To simplify all that, probe the RCRB at a later point during RCH downstream port creation. Change ACPI table parser to only extract the base address of either the component registers or the RCRB. Parse and extract the RCRB in devm_cxl_add_rch_dport(). This is in preparation to centralize all RCRB scanning. Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230622205523.85375-2-terry.bowman@amd.com Co-developed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230622205523.85375-3-terry.bowman@amd.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2023-05-19cxl: Move cxl_await_media_ready() to before capacity info retrievalDave Jiang1-0/+3
Move cxl_await_media_ready() to cxl_pci probe before driver starts issuing IDENTIFY and retrieving memory device information to ensure that the device is ready to provide the information. Allow cxl_pci_probe() to succeed even if media is not ready. Cache the media failure in cxlds and don't ask the device for any media information. The rationale for proceeding in the !media_ready case is to allow for mailbox operations to interrogate and/or remediate the device. After media is repaired then rebinding the cxl_pci driver is expected to restart the capacity scan. Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Fixes: b39cb1052a5c ("cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices") Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/168445310026.3251520.8124296540679268206.stgit@djiang5-mobl3 [djbw: fixup cxl_test] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2023-04-23cxl/mem: Add debugfs attributes for poison inject and clearAlison Schofield1-0/+28
Inject and Clear Poison commands are optionally supported by CXL memdev devices and are intended for use in debug environments only. Add debugfs attributes for user access. Documentation/ABI/testing/debugfs-cxl describes the usage. Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0c9ea8e671b8e58465d18722788b60d325c675c7.1681874357.git.alison.schofield@intel.com Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2023-04-23cxl/memdev: Add trigger_poison_list sysfs attributeAlison Schofield1-0/+43
When a boolean 'true' is written to this attribute the memdev driver retrieves the poison list from the device. The list consists of addresses that are poisoned, or would result in poison if accessed, and the source of the poison. This attribute is only visible for devices supporting the capability. The retrieved errors are logged as kernel events when cxl_poison event tracing is enabled. Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1081cfdc8a349dc754779642d584707e56db26ba.1681838291.git.alison.schofield@intel.com Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-12-05cxl/port: Add RCD endpoint port enumerationDan Williams1-8/+25
Unlike a CXL memory expander in a VH topology that has at least one intervening 'struct cxl_port' instance between itself and the CXL root device, an RCD attaches one-level higher. For example: VH ┌──────────┐ │ ACPI0017 │ │ root0 │ └─────┬────┘ │ ┌─────┴────┐ │ dport0 │ ┌─────┤ ACPI0016 ├─────┐ │ │ port1 │ │ │ └────┬─────┘ │ │ │ │ ┌──┴───┐ ┌──┴───┐ ┌───┴──┐ │dport0│ │dport1│ │dport2│ │ RP0 │ │ RP1 │ │ RP2 │ └──────┘ └──┬───┘ └──────┘ │ ┌───┴─────┐ │endpoint0│ │ port2 │ └─────────┘ ...vs: RCH ┌──────────┐ │ ACPI0017 │ │ root0 │ └────┬─────┘ │ ┌───┴────┐ │ dport0 │ │ACPI0016│ └───┬────┘ │ ┌────┴─────┐ │endpoint0 │ │ port1 │ └──────────┘ So arrange for endpoint port in the RCH/RCD case to appear directly connected to the host-bridge in its singular role as a dport. Compare that to the VH case where the host-bridge serves a dual role as a 'cxl_dport' for the CXL root device *and* a 'cxl_port' upstream port for the Root Ports in the Root Complex that are modeled as 'cxl_dport' instances in the CXL topology. Another deviation from the VH case is that RCDs may need to look up their component registers from the Root Complex Register Block (RCRB). That platform firmware specified RCRB area is cached by the cxl_acpi driver and conveyed via the host-bridge dport to the cxl_mem driver to perform the cxl_rcrb_to_component() lookup for the endpoint port (See 9.11.8 CXL Devices Attached to an RCH for the lookup of the upstream port component registers). Tested-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166993045621.1882361.1730100141527044744.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com Reviewed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Camerom <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-12-05cxl/mem: Move devm_cxl_add_endpoint() from cxl_core to cxl_memDan Williams1-0/+38
tl;dr: Clean up an unnecessary export and enable cxl_test. An RCD (Restricted CXL Device), in contrast to a typical CXL device in a VH topology, obtains its component registers from the bottom half of the associated CXL host bridge RCRB (Root Complex Register Block). In turn this means that cxl_rcrb_to_component() needs to be called from devm_cxl_add_endpoint(). Presently devm_cxl_add_endpoint() is part of the CXL core, but the only user is the CXL mem module. Move it from cxl_core to cxl_mem to not only get rid of an unnecessary export, but to also enable its call out to cxl_rcrb_to_component(), in a subsequent patch, to be mocked by cxl_test. Recall that cxl_test can only mock exported symbols, and since cxl_rcrb_to_component() is itself inside the core, all callers must be outside of cxl_core to allow cxl_test to mock it. Reviewed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166993045072.1882361.13944923741276843683.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-12-03cxl/pmem: Refactor nvdimm device registration, delete the workqueueDan Williams1-0/+9
The three objects 'struct cxl_nvdimm_bridge', 'struct cxl_nvdimm', and 'struct cxl_pmem_region' manage CXL persistent memory resources. The bridge represents base platform resources, the nvdimm represents one or more endpoints, and the region is a collection of nvdimms that contribute to an assembled address range. Their relationship is such that a region is torn down if any component endpoints are removed. All regions and endpoints are torn down if the foundational bridge device goes down. A workqueue was deployed to manage these interdependencies, but it is difficult to reason about, and fragile. A recent attempt to take the CXL root device lock in the cxl_mem driver was reported by lockdep as colliding with the flush_work() in the cxl_pmem flows. Instead of the workqueue, arrange for all pmem/nvdimm devices to be torn down immediately and hierarchically. A similar change is made to both the 'cxl_nvdimm' and 'cxl_pmem_region' objects. For bisect-ability both changes are made in the same patch which unfortunately makes the patch bigger than desired. Arrange for cxl_memdev and cxl_region to register a cxl_nvdimm and cxl_pmem_region as a devres release action of the bridge device. Additionally, include a devres release action of the cxl_memdev or cxl_region device that triggers the bridge's release action if an endpoint exits before the bridge. I.e. this allows either unplugging the bridge, or unplugging and endpoint to result in the same cleanup actions. To keep the patch smaller the cleanup of the now defunct workqueue infrastructure is saved for a follow-on patch. Tested-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166993041773.1882361.16444301376147207609.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-07-22cxl/mem: Enumerate port targets before adding endpointsDan Williams1-29/+1
The port scanning algorithm in devm_cxl_enumerate_ports() walks up the topology and adds cxl_port objects starting from the root down to the endpoint. When those ports are initially created they know all their dports, but they do not know the downstream cxl_port instance that represents the next descendant in the topology. Rework create_endpoint() into devm_cxl_add_endpoint() that enumerates the downstream cxl_port topology into each port's 'struct cxl_ep' record for each endpoint it that the port is an ancestor. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220624041950.559155-7-dan.j.williams@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-07-22cxl/port: Record parent dport when adding portsDan Williams1-4/+6
At the time that cxl_port instances are being created, cache the dport from the parent port that points to this new child port. This will be useful for region provisioning when walking the tree to calculate decoder targets, and saves rewalking the dport list after the fact to build this information. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220624041950.559155-1-dan.j.williams@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-07-10cxl/mem: Add a debugfs version of 'iomem' for DPA, 'dpamem'Dan Williams1-0/+23
Dump the device-physical-address map for a CXL expander in /proc/iomem style format. E.g.: cat /sys/kernel/debug/cxl/mem1/dpamem 00000000-0fffffff : ram 10000000-1fffffff : pmem Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165603885318.551046.8308248564880066726.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-06-22cxl: Fix cleanup of port devices on failure to probe driver.Jonathan Cameron1-1/+6
The device is created, and then there is a check if a driver succesfully bound to it. In event of failing the bind (e.g. failure in cxl_port_probe()) the device is left registered. When a bus rescan later occurs, fresh devices are created leading to a multiple device representing the same underlying hardware. Bad things may follow and at very least we have far too many devices. Fix by ensuring autoremove is registered if the device create succeeds, but doesn't depend on sucessful binding to a driver. Bug was observed as side effect of incorrect ownership in [PATCH v9 6/9] cxl/port: Read CDAT table but will result from any failure to in cxl_port_probe(). Fixes: 8dd2bc0f8e02 ("cxl/mem: Add the cxl_mem driver") Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609134519.11668-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-05-19cxl/port: Move endpoint HDM Decoder Capability init to port driverDan Williams1-11/+0
The responsibility for establishing HDM Decoder Capability based operation is more closely tied to port enabling than memdev enabling which is concerned with port enumeration. This later enables reusing @cxlhdm for probing / controlling "global enable" for the HDM Decoder Capability. For now, just do the nominal move. Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291691167.1426646.7936109077255288258.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-05-19cxl/pci: Drop @info argument to cxl_hdm_decode_init()Dan Williams1-2/+1
Now that nothing external to cxl_hdm_decode_init() considers 'struct cxl_endpoint_dvec_info' move it internal to cxl_hdm_decode_init(). Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291690612.1426646.7866084245521113414.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-05-19cxl/mem: Merge cxl_dvsec_ranges() and cxl_hdm_decode_init()Dan Williams1-79/+1
In preparation for changing how the driver handles 'mem_enable' in the CXL DVSEC control register. Merge the contents of cxl_hdm_decode_init() into cxl_dvsec_ranges() and rename the combined function cxl_hdm_decode_init(). The possible cleanups and fixes that result from this merge are saved for a follow-on change. Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291690027.1426646.10249756632415633752.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-05-19cxl/mem: Skip range enumeration if mem_enable clearDan Williams1-1/+1
When a device does not have mem_enable set then the current range settings are moot. Skip the enumeration and cause cxl_hdm_decode_init() to proceed directly to enable the HDM Decoder Capability. Fixes: 560f78559006 ("cxl/pci: Retrieve CXL DVSEC memory info") Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291689442.1426646.18012291761753694336.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-05-19cxl/mem: Consolidate CXL DVSEC Range enumeration in the coreDan Williams1-6/+8
In preparation for fixing the setting of the 'mem_enabled' bit in CXL DVSEC Control register, move all CXL DVSEC range enumeration into the same source file. Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291688886.1426646.15046138604010482084.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-05-19cxl/pci: Move cxl_await_media_ready() to the coreDan Williams1-1/+1
Allow cxl_await_media_ready() to be mocked for testing purposes rather than carrying the maintenance burden of an indirect function call in the mainline driver. With the move cxl_await_media_ready() can no longer reuse the mailbox timeout override, so add a media_ready_timeout module parameter to the core to backfill. Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291688340.1426646.4755627801983775011.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-05-19cxl/mem: Validate port connectivity before dvsec rangesDan Williams1-16/+16
In preparation for validating DVSEC ranges against the platform declared CXL memory ranges (ACPI CFMWS) move port enumeration before the endpoint's decoder validation. Ultimately this logic will move to the port driver, but create a bisect point before that larger move. Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291687749.1426646.18091538443879226995.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-05-19cxl/mem: Fix cxl_mem_probe() error exitDan Williams1-2/+4
The addition of cxl_mem_active() broke error exit scenarios for cxl_mem_probe(). Return early rather than proceed with disabling suspend, and update the label name since it is no longer a terminal "out" label that exits the function. Fixes: 9ea4dcf49878 ("PM: CXL: Disable suspend") Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291687176.1426646.15449254938752532784.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-05-19cxl/pci: Consolidate wait_for_media() and wait_for_media_ready()Dan Williams1-18/+1
Now that wait_for_media() does nothing supplemental to wait_for_media_ready() just promote wait_for_media_ready() to a common helper and drop wait_for_media(). Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291686046.1426646.4390664747934592185.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-05-19cxl/mem: Drop mem_enabled check from wait_for_media()Dan Williams1-4/+0
Media ready is asserted by the device independent of whether mem_enabled was ever set. Drop this check to allow for dropping wait_for_media() in favor of ->wait_media_ready(). Fixes: 8dd2bc0f8e02 ("cxl/mem: Add the cxl_mem driver") Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291685501.1426646.10372821863672431074.stgit@dwillia2-xfh Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-04-29cxl: Drop cxl_device_lock()Dan Williams1-2/+2
Now that all CXL subsystem locking is validated with custom lock classes, there is no need for the custom usage of the lockdep_mutex. Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165055520383.3745911.53447786039115271.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-04-23PM: CXL: Disable suspendDan Williams1-1/+21
The CXL specification claims S3 support at a hardware level, but at a system software level there are some missing pieces. Section 9.4 (CXL 2.0) rightly claims that "CXL mem adapters may need aux power to retain memory context across S3", but there is no enumeration mechanism for the OS to determine if a given adapter has that support. Moreover the save state and resume image for the system may inadvertantly end up in a CXL device that needs to be restored before the save state is recoverable. I.e. a circular dependency that is not resolvable without a third party save-area. Arrange for the cxl_mem driver to fail S3 attempts. This still nominaly allows for suspend, but requires unbinding all CXL memory devices before the suspend to ensure the typical DRAM flow is taken. The cxl_mem unbind flow is intended to also tear down all CXL memory regions associated with a given cxl_memdev. It is reasonable to assume that any device participating in a System RAM range published in the EFI memory map is covered by aux power and save-area outside the device itself. So this restriction can be minimized in the future once pre-existing region enumeration support arrives, and perhaps a spec update to clarify if the EFI memory map is sufficent for determining the range of devices managed by platform-firmware for S3 support. Per Rafael, if the CXL configuration prevents suspend then it should fail early before tasks are frozen, and mem_sleep should stop showing 'mem' as an option [1]. Effectively CXL augments the platform suspend ->valid() op since, for example, the ACPI ops are not aware of the CXL / PCI dependencies. Given the split role of platform firmware vs OS provisioned CXL memory it is up to the cxl_mem driver to determine if the CXL configuration has elements that platform firmware may not be prepared to restore. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAJZ5v0hGVN_=3iU8OLpHY3Ak35T5+JcBM-qs8SbojKrpd0VXsA@mail.gmail.com [1] Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165066828317.3907920.5690432272182042556.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-04-13cxl/mem: Replace redundant debug message with a commentDan Williams1-4/+10
cxl_mem_probe() already emits a log message when HDM operation can not be established. Delete the similar one in cxl_hdm_decode_init(). What is less obvious is why global_ctrl being enabled makes positive values of info->ranges irrelevant, and the Linux behavior with respect to the spec recommendation to mirror CXL Range registers with HDM Decoder Base + Size registers. Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164944616743.454665.7055846627973202403.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-04-13cxl/mem: Rename cxl_dvsec_decode_init() to cxl_hdm_decode_init()Dan Williams1-6/+6
cxl_dvsec_decode_init() is tasked with checking whether legacy DVSEC range based decode is in effect, or whether HDM can be enabled / already is enabled. As such it either succeeds or fails and that result is the return value. The @do_hdm_init variable is misleading in the case where HDM operation is already found to be active, so just call it @retval. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164730736435.3806189.2537160791687837469.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-04-13cxl/mem: Make cxl_dvsec_range() init failure fatalDan Williams1-0/+3
In preparation for the cxl_pci driver to continue operation after cxl_dvsec_range() failure, update cxl_mem to check for negative error codes in info->ranges. Treat that condition as fatal regardless of the state of the HDM configuration since cxl_mem needs positive confirmation that legacy ranges were not established by platform firmware or another agent. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com. Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164730735324.3806189.4167509857771192422.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-04-13cxl/mem: Drop DVSEC vs EFI Memory Map sanity checkDan Williams1-23/+1
When the driver finds legacy DVSEC ranges active on a CXL Memory Expander it indicates that platform firmware is not aware of, or is deliberately disabling common CXL 2.0 operation. In this case Linux generally has no choice, but to leave the device alone. The driver attempts to validate that the DVSEC range is in the EFI memory map. Remove that logic since there is no requirement that the BIOS publish DVSEC ranges in the EFI Memory Map. In the future the driver will want to permanently reserve this capacity out of the available CFMWS capacity and hide it from request_free_mem_region(), but it serves no purpose to warn about the range not appearing in the EFI Memory Map. Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164730734246.3806189.13995924771963139898.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-02-09cxl/mem: Add the cxl_mem driverBen Widawsky1-0/+228
At this point the subsystem can enumerate all CXL ports (CXL.mem decode resources in upstream switch ports and host bridges) in a system. The last mile is connecting those ports to endpoints. The cxl_mem driver connects an endpoint device to the platform CXL.mem protoctol decode-topology. At ->probe() time it walks its device-topology-ancestry and adds a CXL Port object at every Upstream Port hop until it gets to CXL root. The CXL root object is only present after a platform firmware driver registers platform CXL resources. For ACPI based platform this is managed by the ACPI0017 device and the cxl_acpi driver. The ports are registered such that disabling a given port automatically unregisters all descendant ports, and the chain can only be registered after the root is established. Given ACPI device scanning may run asynchronously compared to PCI device scanning the root driver is tasked with rescanning the bus after the root successfully probes. Conversely if any ports in a chain between the root and an endpoint becomes disconnected it subsequently triggers the endpoint to unregister. Given lock depenedencies the endpoint unregistration happens in a workqueue asynchronously. If userspace cares about synchronizing delayed work after port events the /sys/bus/cxl/flush attribute is available for that purpose. Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> [djbw: clarify changelog, rework hotplug support] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164398782997.903003.9725273241627693186.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-05-26cxl: Rename mem to pciBen Widawsky1-1525/+0
As the driver has undergone development, it's become clear that the majority [entirety?] of the current functionality in mem.c is actually a layer encapsulating functionality exposed through PCI based interactions. This layer can be used either in isolation or to provide functionality for higher level functionality. CXL capabilities exist in a parallel domain to PCIe. CXL devices are enumerable and controllable via "legacy" PCIe mechanisms; however, their CXL capabilities are a superset of PCIe. For example, a CXL device may be connected to a non-CXL capable PCIe root port, and therefore will not be able to participate in CXL.mem or CXL.cache operations, but can still be accessed through PCIe mechanisms for CXL.io operations. To properly represent the PCI nature of this driver, and in preparation for introducing a new driver for the CXL.mem / HDM decoder (Host-managed Device Memory) capabilities of a CXL memory expander, rename mem.c to pci.c so that mem.c is available for this new driver. The result of the change is that there is a clear layering distinction in the driver, and a systems administrator may load only the cxl_pci module and gain access to such operations as, firmware update, offline provisioning of devices, and error collection. In addition to freeing up the file name for another purpose, there are two primary reasons this is useful, 1. Acting upon devices which don't have full CXL capabilities. This may happen for instance if the CXL device is connected in a CXL unaware part of the platform topology. 2. Userspace-first provisioning for devices without kernel driver interference. This may be useful when provisioning a new device in a specific manner that might otherwise be blocked or prevented by the real CXL mem driver. Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210526174413.802913-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-05-15cxl/core: Refactor CXL register lookup for bridge reuseDan Williams1-44/+6
While CXL Memory Device endpoints locate the CXL MMIO registers in a PCI BAR, CXL root bridges have their MMIO base address described by platform firmware. Refactor the existing register lookup into a generic facility for endpoints and bridges to share. Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162096972534.1865304.3218686216153688039.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-05-15cxl/mem: Introduce 'struct cxl_regs' for "composable" CXL devicesDan Williams1-20/+24
CXL MMIO register blocks are organized by device type and capabilities. There are Component registers, Device registers (yes, an ambiguous name), and Memory Device registers (a specific extension of Device registers). It is possible for a given device instance (endpoint or port) to implement register sets from multiple of the above categories. The driver code that enumerates and maps the registers is type specific so it is useful to have a dedicated type and helpers for each block type. At the same time, once the registers are mapped the origin type does not matter. It is overly pedantic to reference the register block type in code that is using the registers. In preparation for the endpoint driver to incorporate Component registers into its MMIO operations reorganize the registers to allow typed enumeration + mapping, but anonymous usage. With the end state of 'struct cxl_regs' to be: struct cxl_regs { union { struct { CXL_DEVICE_REGS(); }; struct cxl_device_regs device_regs; }; union { struct { CXL_COMPONENT_REGS(); }; struct cxl_component_regs component_regs; }; }; With this arrangement the driver can share component init code with ports, but when using the registers it can directly reference the component register block type by name without the 'component_regs' prefix. So, map + enumerate can be shared across drivers of different CXL classes e.g.: void cxl_setup_device_regs(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct cxl_device_regs *regs); void cxl_setup_component_regs(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct cxl_component_regs *regs); ...while inline usage in the driver need not indicate where the registers came from: readl(cxlm->regs.mbox + MBOX_OFFSET); readl(cxlm->regs.hdm + HDM_OFFSET); ...instead of: readl(cxlm->regs.device_regs.mbox + MBOX_OFFSET); readl(cxlm->regs.component_regs.hdm + HDM_OFFSET); This complexity of the definition in .h yields improvement in code readability in .c while maintaining type-safety for organization of setup code. It prepares the implementation to maintain organization in the face of CXL devices that compose register interfaces consisting of multiple types. Given that this new container is named 'regs' rename the common register base pointer @base, and fixup the kernel-doc for the missing @cxlmd description. Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162096971451.1865304.13540251513463515153.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-05-15cxl/mem: Move some definitions to mem.hDan Williams1-20/+1
In preparation for sharing cxl.h with other generic CXL consumers, move / consolidate some of the memory device specifics to mem.h. The motivation for moving out of cxl.h is to maintain least privilege access to memory-device details since cxl.h is used in multiple files. The motivation for moving definitions into a new mem.h header is for code readability and organization. I.e. minimize implementation details when reading data structures and other definitions. Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162096970932.1865304.14510894426562947262.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-04-17cxl/mem: Fix memory device capacity probingDan Williams1-2/+5
The CXL Identify Memory Device output payload emits capacity in 256MB units. The driver is treating the capacity field as bytes. This was missed because QEMU reports bytes when it should report bytes / 256MB. Fixes: 8adaf747c9f0 ("cxl/mem: Find device capabilities") Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161862021044.3259705.7008520073059739760.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-04-16cxl/mem: Fix register block offset calculationBen Widawsky1-1/+1
The "Register Offset Low" register of a "DVSEC Register Locator" contains the 64K aligned offset for the registers along with the BAR indicator and an id. The implementation was treating the "Register Block Offset Low" field a value rather than as a pre-aligned component of the 64-bit offset. So, just mask, don't mask and shift (FIELD_GET). The user visible result of this bug is that the driver fails to bind to the device after none of the required blocks are found. This was missed earlier because the primary development done in the QEMU environment only uses 0 offsets, i.e. 0 shifted is still 0. Fixes: 8adaf747c9f0 ("cxl/mem: Find device capabilities") Reported-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210415232610.603273-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-04-06cxl/mem: Force array size of mem_commands[] to CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_MAXRobert Richter1-1/+1
Typically the mem_commands[] array is in sync with 'enum { CXL_CMDS }'. Current code works well. However, the array size of mem_commands[] may not strictly be the same as CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_MAX. E.g. if a new CXL_CMD() is added that is guarded by #ifdefs, the array could be shorter. This could lead then further to an out-of-bounds array access in cxl_validate_cmd_from_user(). Fix this by forcing the array size to CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_MAX. This also adds range checks for array items in mem_commands[] at compile time. Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210324141635.22335-1-rrichter@amd.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-04-06cxl/mem: Disable cxl device power managementDan Williams1-0/+1
There is no power management of cxl virtual devices, disable device-power-management and runtime-power-management to prevent userspace from growing expectations of those attributes appearing. They can be added back in the future if needed. Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161728761025.2474381.808344500111924819.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-04-06cxl/mem: Do not rely on device_add() side effects for dev_set_name() failuresDan Williams1-10/+29
While device_add() will happen to catch dev_set_name() failures it is a broken pattern to follow given that the core may try to fall back to a different name. Add explicit checking for dev_set_name() failures to be cleaned up by put_device(). Skip cdev_device_add() and proceed directly to put_device() if the name set fails. This type of bug is easier to see if 'alloc' is split from 'add' operations that require put_device() on failure. So cxl_memdev_alloc() is split out as a result. Fixes: b39cb1052a5c ("cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices") Reported-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161728760514.2474381.1163928273337158134.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-04-06cxl/mem: Fix synchronization mechanism for device removal vs ioctl operationsDan Williams1-47/+50
The percpu_ref to gate whether cxl_memdev_ioctl() is free to use the driver context (@cxlm) to issue I/O is overkill, implemented incorrectly (missing a device reference before accessing the percpu_ref), and the complexities of shutting down a percpu_ref contributed to a bug in the error unwind in cxl_mem_add_memdev() (missing put_device() to be fixed separately). Use an rwsem to explicitly synchronize the usage of cxlmd->cxlm, and add the missing reference counting for cxlmd in cxl_memdev_open() and cxl_memdev_release_file(). Fixes: b39cb1052a5c ("cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices") Reported-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161728759948.2474381.17481500816783671817.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-04-06cxl/mem: Use sysfs_emit() for attribute show routinesDan Williams1-4/+4
While none the CXL sysfs attributes are threatening to overrun a PAGE_SIZE of output, it is good form to use the recommended helpers. Fixes: b39cb1052a5c ("cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices") Reported-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161728759424.2474381.11231441014951343463.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-02-23cxl/mem: Fix potential memory leakBen Widawsky1-1/+3
When submitting a command for userspace, input and output payload bounce buffers are allocated. For a given command, both input and output buffers may exist and so when allocation of the input buffer fails, the output buffer must be freed too. As far as I can tell, userspace can't easily exploit the leak to OOM a machine unless the machine was already near OOM state. Fixes: 583fa5e71cae ("cxl/mem: Add basic IOCTL interface") Reported-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210221035846.680145-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-02-19cxl/mem: Return -EFAULT if copy_to_user() failsDan Carpenter1-1/+4
The copy_to_user() function returns the number of bytes remaining to be copied, but we want to return -EFAULT if the copy doesn't complete. Fixes: b754ffbbc0ee ("cxl/mem: Add basic IOCTL interface") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YC+K3kgzqm20zCWY@mwanda Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-02-17cxl/mem: Add set of informational commandsBen Widawsky1-0/+9
Add initial set of formal commands beyond basic identify and command enumeration. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (v2) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210217040958.1354670-8-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>