| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The DisplayID structure version and primary use case are stored in the
DisplayID Base Section. We should be checking them in a number of places
when parsing the DisplayID blocks. Currently, we completely ignore the
primary use case, and just look at the block tags without cross-checking
against structure version.
Store the version and primary use case in the DisplayID iterator, and
provide accessors to them. In general, the information is needed when
iterating the blocks, and this is a convenient place to both store and
retrieve the information during parsing.
Promote using accessors rather than users poking at the iterator
directly.
Cc: Iaroslav Boliukin <iam@lach.pw>
Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ad8a35c109f97ffe115e6b18e4a132b592f11089.1676580180.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Avoid figuring out the header pointer multiple times.
Cc: Iaroslav Boliukin <iam@lach.pw>
Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/e840c744d165608a41db5a5e2bd4b0205783c697.1676580180.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Add a helper to get a pointer to struct displayid_header. To be
pedantic, add buffer overflow checks to not touch the base if that
itself would overflow.
Cc: Iaroslav Boliukin <iam@lach.pw>
Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4a03b3a5132642d3cdb6d4c2641422955a917292.1676580180.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
We'll need to propagate drm_edid everywhere.
v2: Rebase
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/a52a6882e87a4bb6b1670918f3aba13f9b52f6de.1652097712.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Avoid any confusion with High Dynamic Range. No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ce083bd2789c7e22a91710726162287db88e3f6c.1617024940.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
The DisplayID specifications explicitly call out 0 as a valid payload
length for data blocks. The mere presence of a data block, or the
information coded in the block specific data (bits 7:3 in offset 1), may
be enough to convey the necessary information.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/d562dff99ba7c92accb654a99b433bed471e8507.1617024940.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Neatly reduce displayid boilerplate in code. Remove excessive debug
logging while at it, no other functional changes.
The old displayid iterator becomes unused; remove it as well as make
drm_find_displayid_extension() static.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/fa4b5c790b5bdd82063545a6f209f8e9d78a63a7.1617024940.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Iterating DisplayID blocks across sections (in EDID extensions) is
unnecessarily complicated for the caller. Implement DisplayID iterators
to go through all blocks in all sections.
Usage example:
const struct displayid_block *block;
struct displayid_iter iter;
displayid_iter_edid_begin(edid, &iter);
displayid_iter_for_each(block, &iter) {
/* operate on block */
}
displayid_iter_end(&iter);
When DisplayID is stored in EDID extensions, the DisplayID sections map
to extensions as described in VESA DisplayID v1.3 Appendix B: DisplayID
as an EDID Extension. This is implemented here.
When DisplayID is stored in its dedicated DDC device 0xA4, according to
VESA E-DDC v1.3, different rules apply for the structure. This is not
implemented here, as we don't currently use it, but the idea is you'd
have a different call for beginning the iteration, for example simply:
displayid_iter_begin(displayid, &iter);
instead of displayid_iter_edid_begin(), and everything else would be
hidden away in the iterator functions.
v2:
- sizeof(struct displayid_block) -> sizeof(*block) (Ville)
- remove __ prefix from displayid_iter_block
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/da3dead1752ab16c061f7bd248ac1a4268f7fefb.1617024940.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
We'll be adding more DisplayID specific functions going forward, so
start off by splitting out a few functions to a separate file.
We don't bother with exporting the functions; at least for now they
should be needed solely within drm.ko.
No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/07942d5011891b8e8f77245c78b34f4af97a9315.1617024940.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
