| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Update the max GSC-fw response time to match updated internal
fw specs. Because this response time is an SLA on the firmware,
not inclusive of i915->GuC->HW handoff latency, when submitting
requests to the GSC fw via intel_gsc_uc_heci_cmd_submit helpers,
start the count after the request hits the GSC command streamer.
Also, move GSC_REPLY_LATENCY_MS definition from pxp header to
intel_gsc_uc_heci_cmd_submit.h since its for any GSC HECI packet.
Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vivaik Balasubrawmanian <vivaik.balasubrawmanian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230917211933.1407559-2-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com
|
|
The compatibility version is queried via an MKHI command. Right now, the
only existing interface is 1.0
This is basically the interface version for the GSC FW, so the plan is
to use it as the main tracked version, including for the binary naming
in the fetch code.
v2: use define for the object size (Alan)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230612181529.2222451-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
|
Add GSC engine based method for sending PXP firmware packets
to the GSC firmware for MTL (and future) products.
Use the newly added helpers to populate the GSC-CS memory
header and send the message packet to the FW by dispatching
the GSC_HECI_CMD_PKT instruction on the GSC engine.
We use non-priveleged batches for submission to GSC engine
which require two buffers for the request:
- a buffer for the HECI packet that contains PXP FW commands
- a batch-buffer that contains the engine instruction for
sending the HECI packet to the GSC firmware.
Thus, add the allocation and freeing of these buffers in gsccs
init and fini.
The GSC-fw may reply to commands with a SUCCESS but with an
additional pending-bit set in the reply packet. This bit
means the GSC-FW is currently busy and the caller needs to
try again with the gsc_message_handle the fw returned. Thus,
add a wrapper to continuously retry send_message while
replaying the gsc_message_handle. Retries need to follow the
arch-spec count and delay until GSC-FW replies with the real
SUCCESS or timeout after that spec'd delay.
The GSC-fw requires a non-zero host_session_handle provided
by the caller to enable gsc_message_handle tracking. Thus,
allocate the host_session_handle at init and destroy it
at fini (the latter requiring an FYI to the gsc-firmware).
Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230511231738.1077674-5-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com
|
|
Add helper functions into a new file for heci-packet-submission.
The helpers will handle generating the MTL GSC-CS Memory-Header
and submission of the Heci-Cmd-Packet instructions to the engine.
NOTE1: These common functions for heci-packet-submission will be used
by different i915 callers:
1- GSC-SW-Proxy: This is pending upstream publication awaiting
a few remaining opens
2- MTL-HDCP: An equivalent patch has also been published at:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/111876/. (Patch 1)
3- PXP: This series.
NOTE2: A difference in this patch vs what is appearing is in bullet 2
above is that HDCP (and SW-Proxy) will be using priveleged submission
(GGTT and common gsc-uc-context) while PXP will be using non-priveleged
PPGTT, context and batch buffer. Therefore this patch will only slightly
overlap with the MTL-HDCP patches despite have very similar function
names (emit_foo vs emit_nonpriv_foo). This is because HECI_CMD_PKT
instructions require different flows and hw-specific code when done
via PPGTT based submission (not different from other engines). MTL-HDCP
contains the same intel_gsc_mtl_header_t structures as this but the
helpers there are different. Both add the same new file names.
NOTE3: Additional clarity about the heci-cmd-pkt layout and where the
common helpers come in:
- On MTL, when an i915 subsystem needs to send a command request
to the security firmware, it will send that via the GSC-
engine-command-streamer.
- However those commands, (lets call them "gsc_specific_fw_api"
calls), are not understood by the GSC command streamer hw.
- The GSC CS only looks at the GSC_HECI_CMD_PKT instruction and
passes it along to the GSC firmware.
- The GSC FW on the other hand needs additional metadata to know
which usage service is being called (PXP, HDCP, proxy, etc) along
with session specific info. Thus an extra header called GSC-CS
HECI Memory Header, (C) in below diagram is prepended before
the FW specific API, (D).
- Thus, the structural layout of the request submitted would
need to look like the diagram below (for non-priv PXP).
- In the diagram, the common helper for HDCP, (GSC-Sw-Proxy) and
PXP (i.e. new function intel_gsc_uc_heci_cmd_emit_mtl_header)
will populate blob (C) while additional helpers, different for
PPGGTT (this patch) vs GGTT (HDCP series) will populate
blobs (A) and (B) below.
___________________________________________________________
(A) | MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START (ppgtt, batchbuff-addr, ...) |
| | |
| _|________________________________________________ |
| (B)| GSC_HECI_CMD_PKT (pkt-addr-in, pkt-size-in, | |
| | pkt-addr-out, pkt-size-out) |--------
| | MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END | | |
| |________________________________________________| | |
| | |
|_________________________________________________________| |
|
---------------------------------------------------------
|
\|/
______V___________________________________________
| _________________________________________ |
|(C)| | |
| | struct intel_gsc_mtl_header { | |
| | validity marker | |
| | heci_clent_id | |
| | ... | |
| | } | |
| |_______________________________________| |
|(D)| | |
| | struct gsc_fw_specific_api_foobar { | |
| | ... | |
| | For an example, see | |
| | 'struct pxp43_create_arb_in' at | |
| | intel_pxp_cmd_interface_43.h | |
| | | |
| | } | |
| | Struture depends on command type | |
| | struct gsc_fw_specific_api_foobar { | |
| |_______________________________________| |
|________________________________________________|
That said, this patch provides basic helpers but leaves the
PXP subsystem (i.e. the caller) to handle (D) and everything
else such as input/output size verification or handling the
responses from security firmware (for example, requiring a retry).
Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230511231738.1077674-4-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com
|
|
The GSC uC needs to communicate with the CSME to perform certain
operations. Since the GSC can't perform this communication directly
on platforms where it is integrated in GT, i915 needs to transfer the
messages from GSC to CSME and back.
The proxy flow is as follow:
1 - i915 submits a request to GSC asking for the message to CSME
2 - GSC replies with the proxy header + payload for CSME
3 - i915 sends the reply from GSC as-is to CSME via the mei proxy
component
4 - CSME replies with the proxy header + payload for GSC
5 - i915 submits a request to GSC with the reply from CSME
6 - GSC replies either with a new header + payload (same as step 2,
so we restart from there) or with an end message.
After GSC load, i915 is expected to start the first proxy message chain,
while all subsequent ones will be triggered by the GSC via interrupt.
To communicate with the CSME, we use a dedicated mei component, which
means that we need to wait for it to bind before we can initialize the
proxies. This usually happens quite fast, but given that there is a
chance that we'll have to wait a few seconds the GSC work has been moved
to a dedicated WQ to not stall other processes.
v2: fix code style, includes and variable naming (Alan)
v3: add extra check for proxy status, fix includes and comments
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230502163854.317653-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
|
Add function that takes care of sending command to gsc cs. We start
of with allocation of memory for our command intel_hdcp_gsc_message that
contains gsc cs memory header as directed in specs followed by the
actual payload hdcp message that we want to send.
Spec states that we need to poll pending bit of response header around
20 times each try being 50ms apart hence adding that to current
gsc_msg_send function
Also we use the same function to take care of both sending and receiving
hence no separate function to get the response.
--v4
-Create common function to fill in gsc_mtl_header [Alan]
-define host session bitmask [Alan]
--v5
-use i915 directly instead of gt->i915 [Alan]
-No need to make fields NULL as we are already
using kzalloc [Alan]
--v8
-change mechanism to reuse the same memory for one hdcp session[Alan]
-fix header ordering
-add comments to explain flags and host session mask [Alan]
--v9
-remove gem obj from hdcp message as we can use
i915_vma_unpin_and_release [Alan]
-move hdcp message allocation and deallocation from hdcp2_enable and
hdcp2_disable to init and teardown of HDCP [Alan]
--v10
-remove unnecessary i915_vma_unpin [Alan]
--v11
-fix comment style [Uma]
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Pervin Teres <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230316092927.668980-6-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
|
|
HDCP and PXP will require a common function to allow it to
submit commands to the gsc cs. Also adding the gsc mtl header
that needs to be added on to the existing payloads of HDCP
and PXP.
--v4
-Seprate gsc load and heci cmd submission into different
functions in different files for better scalability [Alan]
-Rename gsc address field [Alan]
--v5
-remove extra line is intel_gsc_fw.h [Uma]
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal<suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230316092927.668980-2-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
|
