| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Revert "net/mlx5: Implement management PF Ethernet profile"
This reverts commit 22c4640698a1d47606b5a4264a584e8046641784.
Revert "net/mlx5: Enable SD feature"
This reverts commit c88c49ac9c18fb7c3fa431126de1d8f8f555e912.
Revert "net/mlx5e: Block TLS device offload on combined SD netdev"
This reverts commit 83a59ce0057b7753d7fbece194b89622c663b2a6.
Revert "net/mlx5e: Support per-mdev queue counter"
This reverts commit d72baceb92539a178d2610b0e9ceb75706a75b55.
Revert "net/mlx5e: Support cross-vhca RSS"
This reverts commit c73a3ab8fa6e93a783bd563938d7cf00d62d5d34.
Revert "net/mlx5e: Let channels be SD-aware"
This reverts commit e4f9686bdee7b4dd89e0ed63cd03606e4bda4ced.
Revert "net/mlx5e: Create EN core HW resources for all secondary devices"
This reverts commit c4fb94aa822d6c9d05fc3c5aee35c7e339061dc1.
Revert "net/mlx5e: Create single netdev per SD group"
This reverts commit e2578b4f983cfcd47837bbe3bcdbf5920e50b2ad.
Revert "net/mlx5: SD, Add informative prints in kernel log"
This reverts commit c82d360325112ccc512fc11a3b68cdcdf04a1478.
Revert "net/mlx5: SD, Implement steering for primary and secondaries"
This reverts commit 605fcce33b2d1beb0139b6e5913fa0b2062116b2.
Revert "net/mlx5: SD, Implement devcom communication and primary election"
This reverts commit a45af9a96740873db9a4b5bb493ce2ad81ccb4d5.
Revert "net/mlx5: SD, Implement basic query and instantiation"
This reverts commit 63b9ce944c0e26c44c42cdd5095c2e9851c1a8ff.
Revert "net/mlx5: SD, Introduce SD lib"
This reverts commit 4a04a31f49320d078b8078e1da4b0e2faca5dfa3.
Revert "net/mlx5: Fix query of sd_group field"
This reverts commit e04984a37398b3f4f5a79c993b94c6b1224184cc.
Revert "net/mlx5e: Use the correct lag ports number when creating TISes"
This reverts commit a7e7b40c4bc115dbf2a2bb453d7bbb2e0ea99703.
There are some unanswered questions on the list, and we don't
have any docs. Given the lack of replies so far and the fact
that v6.8 merge window has started - let's revert this and
revisit for v6.9.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231221005721.186607-1-saeed@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Use devcom to communicate between the different devices. Add a new
devcom component type for this.
Each device registers itself to the devcom component <SD, group ID>.
Once all devices of a component are registered, the component becomes
ready, and a primary device is elected.
In principle, any of the devices can act as a primary, they are all
capable, and a random election would've worked. However, we aim to
achieve predictability and consistency, hence each group always choses
the same device, with the lowest PCI BUS number, as primary.
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Add a getter for the number of participants in a devcom
component (those who share the same component id and key).
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
mlx5_intf_lock is used to sync between LAG changes and its slaves
mlx5 core dev aux devices changes, which means every time mlx5 core
dev add/remove aux devices, mlx5 is taking this global lock, even if
LAG functionality isn't supported over the core dev.
This cause a bottleneck when probing VFs/SFs in parallel.
Hence, replace mlx5_intf_lock with HCA devcom component lock, or no
lock if LAG functionality isn't supported.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
LAG peer device lookout bus logic required the usage of global lock,
mlx5_intf_mutex.
As part of the effort to remove this global lock, refactor LAG peer
device lookout to use mlx5 devcom layer.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
If the device is in MPV mode, the ethernet driver would now register
to events from IB driver about core devices affiliation or
de-affiliation.
Use the key provided in said event to connect each mlx5e priv
instance to it's master counterpart, this way the ethernet driver
is now aware of who is his master core device and even more, such
as knowing if partner device has IPsec configured or not.
Signed-off-by: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/279adfa0aa3a1957a339086f2c1739a50b8e4b68.1695296682.git.leon@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
|
|
Update devcom infrastructure to be more generic, without
depending on max supported ports definition or a device guid,
and also more encapsulated so callers don't need to pass
the register devcom component id per event call.
Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Now, after all preparation are done, enable 4 ports VF LAG
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
devices
mlx5_devcom_send_event is used to send event from one eswitch to the
other. In other words, only one event is sent, which means, no error
mechanism is needed.
However, In case devcom have more than two eswitches, a proper error
mechanism is needed. Hence, in case of error, devcom will perform the
error unwind, since devcom knows how many events were successful.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Introduce generic APIs which will retrieve all peers.
This API replace mlx5_devcom_get/release_peer_data which retrieve
only a single peer.
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
In downstream patch devcom will provide support for more than two
devices. The term 'paired' will be renamed as 'ready' to convey a
more accurate meaning.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Cited commit causes ABBA deadlock[0] when peer flows are created while
holding the devcom rw semaphore. Due to peer flows offload implementation
the lock is taken much higher up the call chain and there is no obvious way
to easily fix the deadlock. Instead, since tc route query code needs the
peer eswitch structure only to perform a lookup in xarray and doesn't
perform any sleeping operations with it, refactor the code for lockless
execution in following ways:
- RCUify the devcom 'data' pointer. When resetting the pointer
synchronously wait for RCU grace period before returning. This is fine
since devcom is currently only used for synchronization of
pairing/unpairing of eswitches which is rare and already expensive as-is.
- Wrap all usages of 'paired' boolean in {READ|WRITE}_ONCE(). The flag has
already been used in some unlocked contexts without proper
annotations (e.g. users of mlx5_devcom_is_paired() function), but it wasn't
an issue since all relevant code paths checked it again after obtaining the
devcom semaphore. Now it is also used by mlx5_devcom_get_peer_data_rcu() as
"best effort" check to return NULL when devcom is being unpaired. Note that
while RCU read lock doesn't prevent the unpaired flag from being changed
concurrently it still guarantees that reader can continue to use 'data'.
- Refactor mlx5e_tc_query_route_vport() function to use new
mlx5_devcom_get_peer_data_rcu() API which fixes the deadlock.
[0]:
[ 164.599612] ======================================================
[ 164.600142] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 164.600667] 6.3.0-rc3+ #1 Not tainted
[ 164.601021] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 164.601557] handler1/3456 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 164.601998] ffff88811f1714b0 (&esw->offloads.encap_tbl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_attach_encap+0xd8/0x8b0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.603078]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 164.603617] ffff88810137fc98 (&comp->sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_devcom_get_peer_data+0x37/0x80 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.604459]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 164.605190]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 164.605848]
-> #1 (&comp->sem){++++}-{3:3}:
[ 164.606380] down_read+0x39/0x50
[ 164.606772] mlx5_devcom_get_peer_data+0x37/0x80 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.607336] mlx5e_tc_query_route_vport+0x86/0xc0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.607914] mlx5e_tc_tun_route_lookup+0x1a4/0x1d0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.608495] mlx5e_attach_decap_route+0xc6/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.609063] mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow+0x1ea/0x360 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.609627] __mlx5e_add_fdb_flow+0x2d2/0x430 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.610175] mlx5e_configure_flower+0x952/0x1a20 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.610741] tc_setup_cb_add+0xd4/0x200
[ 164.611146] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x14c/0x1f0 [cls_flower]
[ 164.611661] fl_change+0xc95/0x18a0 [cls_flower]
[ 164.612116] tc_new_tfilter+0x3fc/0xd20
[ 164.612516] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x418/0x5b0
[ 164.612936] netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100
[ 164.613339] netlink_unicast+0x190/0x250
[ 164.613746] netlink_sendmsg+0x245/0x4a0
[ 164.614150] sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60
[ 164.614522] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1d0/0x1e0
[ 164.614934] ___sys_sendmsg+0x80/0xc0
[ 164.615320] __sys_sendmsg+0x51/0x90
[ 164.615701] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
[ 164.616083] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
[ 164.616568]
-> #0 (&esw->offloads.encap_tbl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 164.617210] __lock_acquire+0x159e/0x26e0
[ 164.617638] lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2a0
[ 164.618018] __mutex_lock+0x92/0xcd0
[ 164.618401] mlx5e_attach_encap+0xd8/0x8b0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.618943] post_process_attr+0x153/0x2d0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.619471] mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow+0x164/0x360 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.620021] __mlx5e_add_fdb_flow+0x2d2/0x430 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.620564] mlx5e_configure_flower+0xe33/0x1a20 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.621125] tc_setup_cb_add+0xd4/0x200
[ 164.621531] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x14c/0x1f0 [cls_flower]
[ 164.622047] fl_change+0xc95/0x18a0 [cls_flower]
[ 164.622500] tc_new_tfilter+0x3fc/0xd20
[ 164.622906] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x418/0x5b0
[ 164.623324] netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100
[ 164.623727] netlink_unicast+0x190/0x250
[ 164.624138] netlink_sendmsg+0x245/0x4a0
[ 164.624544] sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60
[ 164.624919] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1d0/0x1e0
[ 164.625340] ___sys_sendmsg+0x80/0xc0
[ 164.625731] __sys_sendmsg+0x51/0x90
[ 164.626117] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
[ 164.626502] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
[ 164.626995]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 164.627725] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 164.628268] CPU0 CPU1
[ 164.628683] ---- ----
[ 164.629098] lock(&comp->sem);
[ 164.629421] lock(&esw->offloads.encap_tbl_lock);
[ 164.630066] lock(&comp->sem);
[ 164.630555] lock(&esw->offloads.encap_tbl_lock);
[ 164.630993]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 164.631575] 3 locks held by handler1/3456:
[ 164.631962] #0: ffff888124b75130 (&block->cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: tc_setup_cb_add+0x5b/0x200
[ 164.632703] #1: ffff888116e512b8 (&esw->mode_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_esw_hold+0x39/0x50 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.633552] #2: ffff88810137fc98 (&comp->sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_devcom_get_peer_data+0x37/0x80 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.634435]
stack backtrace:
[ 164.634883] CPU: 17 PID: 3456 Comm: handler1 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc3+ #1
[ 164.635431] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 164.636340] Call Trace:
[ 164.636616] <TASK>
[ 164.636863] dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x70
[ 164.637217] check_noncircular+0xfe/0x110
[ 164.637601] __lock_acquire+0x159e/0x26e0
[ 164.637977] ? mlx5_cmd_set_fte+0x5b0/0x830 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.638472] lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2a0
[ 164.638828] ? mlx5e_attach_encap+0xd8/0x8b0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.639339] ? lock_is_held_type+0x98/0x110
[ 164.639728] __mutex_lock+0x92/0xcd0
[ 164.640074] ? mlx5e_attach_encap+0xd8/0x8b0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.640576] ? __lock_acquire+0x382/0x26e0
[ 164.640958] ? mlx5e_attach_encap+0xd8/0x8b0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.641468] ? mlx5e_attach_encap+0xd8/0x8b0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.641965] mlx5e_attach_encap+0xd8/0x8b0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.642454] ? lock_release+0xbf/0x240
[ 164.642819] post_process_attr+0x153/0x2d0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.643318] mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow+0x164/0x360 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.643835] __mlx5e_add_fdb_flow+0x2d2/0x430 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.644340] mlx5e_configure_flower+0xe33/0x1a20 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.644862] ? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2a0
[ 164.645219] tc_setup_cb_add+0xd4/0x200
[ 164.645588] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x14c/0x1f0 [cls_flower]
[ 164.646067] fl_change+0xc95/0x18a0 [cls_flower]
[ 164.646488] tc_new_tfilter+0x3fc/0xd20
[ 164.646861] ? tc_del_tfilter+0x810/0x810
[ 164.647236] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x418/0x5b0
[ 164.647621] ? rtnl_setlink+0x160/0x160
[ 164.647982] netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100
[ 164.648348] netlink_unicast+0x190/0x250
[ 164.648722] netlink_sendmsg+0x245/0x4a0
[ 164.649090] sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60
[ 164.649434] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1d0/0x1e0
[ 164.649804] ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x6d/0xa0
[ 164.650213] ___sys_sendmsg+0x80/0xc0
[ 164.650563] ? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2a0
[ 164.650926] ? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2a0
[ 164.651286] ? __fget_files+0x5/0x190
[ 164.651644] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[ 164.652006] ? __fget_files+0xb9/0x190
[ 164.652365] ? lock_release+0xbf/0x240
[ 164.652723] ? __fget_files+0xd3/0x190
[ 164.653079] __sys_sendmsg+0x51/0x90
[ 164.653435] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
[ 164.653784] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
[ 164.654229] RIP: 0033:0x7f378054f8bd
[ 164.654577] Code: 28 89 54 24 1c 48 89 74 24 10 89 7c 24 08 e8 6a c3 f4 ff 8b 54 24 1c 48 8b 74 24 10 41 89 c0 8b 7c 24 08 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 33 44 89 c7 48 89 44 24 08 e8 be c3 f4 ff 48
[ 164.656041] RSP: 002b:00007f377fa114b0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
[ 164.656701] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f378054f8bd
[ 164.657297] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007f377fa11540 RDI: 0000000000000014
[ 164.657885] RBP: 00007f377fa12278 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000015c
[ 164.658472] R10: 00007f377fa123d0 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000560962d99bd0
[ 164.665317] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000560962d99bd0 R15: 00007f377fa11540
Fixes: f9d196bd632b ("net/mlx5e: Use correct eswitch for stack devices with lag")
Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Devcom API is intended to be used between 2 devices only add this
implied assumption into the code and check when it's no true.
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
In the sriov offloads mode, packets that are not matched by any
other rule are sent towards the e-switch vport manager for further
processing.
Under upcoming patches (e.g for uplink LAG), packets sent from VF
vports belonging to esw0 (e-switch related to PF0) might end up in
esw1 (e-switch related to PF1) due to muxing logic applied by the
FW.
In such a case we still want the missed packet to be sent to the
"base" esw manager vport in order to present the control plane a
consistent view of the source (VF reresentor) port.
Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Aviv Heller <avivh@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Shahar Klein <shahark@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
|
|
This introduces devcom, a generic mechanism for performing operations
on both physical functions of the same Connect-X card.
The first user of this API is merged eswitch, which will be introduced
in subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: Aviv Heller <avivh@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
|
