summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/regulator/core.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-02-12Merge remote-tracking branch 'regulator/for-5.12' into regulator-nextMark Brown1-7/+11
2021-01-25regulator: core: Avoid debugfs: Directory ... already present! errorHans de Goede1-3/+3
Sometimes regulator_get() gets called twice for the same supply on the same device. This may happen e.g. when a framework / library is used which uses the regulator; and the driver itself also needs to enable the regulator in some cases where the framework will not enable it. Commit ff268b56ce8c ("regulator: core: Don't spew backtraces on duplicate sysfs") already takes care of the backtrace which would trigger when creating a duplicate consumer symlink under /sys/class/regulator/regulator.%d in this scenario. Commit c33d442328f5 ("debugfs: make error message a bit more verbose") causes a new error to get logged in this scenario: [ 26.938425] debugfs: Directory 'wm5102-codec-MICVDD' with parent 'spi-WM510204:00-MICVDD' already present! There is no _nowarn variant of debugfs_create_dir(), but we can detect and avoid this problem by checking the return value of the earlier sysfs_create_link_nowarn() call. Add a check for the earlier sysfs_create_link_nowarn() failing with -EEXIST and skip the debugfs_create_dir() call in that case, avoiding this error getting logged. Fixes: c33d442328f5 ("debugfs: make error message a bit more verbose") Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210122183250.370571-1-hdegoede@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-22regulator: Make regulator_sync_voltage() usable by coupled regulatorsDmitry Osipenko1-1/+5
Make regulator_sync_voltage() to re-balance voltage state of a coupled regulators instead of changing the voltage directly. Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> # Ouya T30 Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> # A500 T20 and Nexus7 T30 Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com> # PAZ00 T20 Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@protonmail.com> # Ouya T30 Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210122174311.28230-1-digetx@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-22regulator: Fix lockdep warning resolving suppliesMark Brown1-12/+17
With commit eaa7995c529b54 (regulator: core: avoid regulator_resolve_supply() race condition) we started holding the rdev lock while resolving supplies, an operation that requires holding the regulator_list_mutex. This results in lockdep warnings since in other places we take the list mutex then the mutex on an individual rdev. Since the goal is to make sure that we don't call set_supply() twice rather than a concern about the cost of resolution pull the rdev lock and check for duplicate resolution down to immediately before we do the set_supply() and drop it again once the allocation is done. Fixes: eaa7995c529b54 (regulator: core: avoid regulator_resolve_supply() race condition) Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210122132042.10306-1-broonie@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-08regulator: core: avoid regulator_resolve_supply() race conditionDavid Collins1-11/+28
The final step in regulator_register() is to call regulator_resolve_supply() for each registered regulator (including the one in the process of being registered). The regulator_resolve_supply() function first checks if rdev->supply is NULL, then it performs various steps to try to find the supply. If successful, rdev->supply is set inside of set_supply(). This procedure can encounter a race condition if two concurrent tasks call regulator_register() near to each other on separate CPUs and one of the regulators has rdev->supply_name specified. There is currently nothing guaranteeing atomicity between the rdev->supply check and set steps. Thus, both tasks can observe rdev->supply==NULL in their regulator_resolve_supply() calls. This then results in both creating a struct regulator for the supply. One ends up actually stored in rdev->supply and the other is lost (though still present in the supply's consumer_list). Here is a kernel log snippet showing the issue: [ 12.421768] gpu_cc_gx_gdsc: supplied by pm8350_s5_level [ 12.425854] gpu_cc_gx_gdsc: supplied by pm8350_s5_level [ 12.429064] debugfs: Directory 'regulator.4-SUPPLY' with parent '17a00000.rsc:rpmh-regulator-gfxlvl-pm8350_s5_level' already present! Avoid this race condition by holding the rdev->mutex lock inside of regulator_resolve_supply() while checking and setting rdev->supply. Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1610068562-4410-1-git-send-email-collinsd@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-04regulator: core.c: Replace references to non-existent functionDaniel Scally1-3/+3
The function regulator_set_device_supply() is referenced a few times in comments in regulator/core.c; however this function was removed a long time ago by commit a5766f11cfd3 ("regulator: core - Rework machine API to remove string based functions."). Update those references to point to set_consumer_device_supply(), which replaced the old function. Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210103165541.784360-1-djrscally@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-12-11Merge remote-tracking branch 'regulator/for-5.11' into regulator-nextMark Brown1-1/+13
2020-11-26regulator: core: return zero for selectors lower than linear_min_selClaudiu Beznea1-4/+6
Selectors lower than linear_min_sel should not be considered invalid. Thus return zero in case _regulator_list_voltage(), regulator_list_hardware_vsel() or regulator_list_voltage_table() receives such selectors as argument. Fixes: bdcd1177578c ("regulator: core: validate selector against linear_min_sel") Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606325147-606-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-11-13regulator: core: do not continue if selector matchClaudiu Beznea1-0/+3
Do not continue if selector has already been located. Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605290164-11556-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-11-13Merge series "regulator: mcp16502: add support for ramp delay" from Claudiu ↵Mark Brown1-2/+7
Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>: Hi, This series adds support for ramp delay on mcp16502. It also adds some cleanup on mcp16502. Apart from that patches 1/6 fixes the selector validation in case the regulator::desc::linear_min_sel is not zero. Thank you, Claudiu Beznea Changes in v3: - fix compilation error in patch 5/6 Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Changes in v2: - rebase on top of regulator/for-next - checked 1/6 and 3/6 applies on top of regulator/for-5.10 Claudiu Beznea (6): regulator: core: validate selector against linear_min_sel regulator: core: do not continue if selector match regulator: mcp16502: add linear_min_sel regulator: mcp16502: adapt for get/set on other registers regulator: mcp16502: add support for ramp delay regulator: mcp16502: remove void documentation of struct mcp16502 drivers/regulator/core.c | 12 +++- drivers/regulator/helpers.c | 3 +- drivers/regulator/mcp16502.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 3 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
2020-11-13regulator: core: validate selector against linear_min_selClaudiu Beznea1-2/+7
There are regulators who's min selector is not zero. Selectors loops (looping b/w zero and regulator::desc::n_voltages) might throw errors because invalid selectors are used (lower than regulator::desc::linear_min_sel). For this situations validate selectors against regulator::desc::linear_min_sel. Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605280870-32432-2-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-11-13regulator: debug early supply resolvingMichał Mirosław1-0/+2
Help debugging the case when set_machine_constraints() needs to be repeated. Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Tested-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> # stpmic1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f9cba575580369e46661a9278ee6c6a8d8564c2a.1605226675.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-11-13regulator: workaround self-referent regulatorsMichał Mirosław1-1/+4
Workaround regulators whose supply name happens to be the same as its own name. This fixes boards that used to work before the early supply resolving was removed. The error message is left in place so that offending drivers can be detected. Fixes: aea6cb99703e ("regulator: resolve supply after creating regulator") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Tested-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> # stpmic1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d703acde2a93100c3c7a81059d716c50ad1b1f52.1605226675.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-11-13regulator: avoid resolve_supply() infinite recursionMichał Mirosław1-0/+6
When a regulator's name equals its supply's name the regulator_resolve_supply() recurses indefinitely. Add a check so that debugging the problem is easier. The "fixed" commit just exposed the problem. Fixes: aea6cb99703e ("regulator: resolve supply after creating regulator") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Tested-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> # stpmic1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c6171057cfc0896f950c4d8cb82df0f9f1b89ad9.1605226675.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-11-13regulator: fix memory leak with repeated set_machine_constraints()Michał Mirosław1-16/+13
Fixed commit introduced a possible second call to set_machine_constraints() and that allocates memory for rdev->constraints. Move the allocation to the caller so it's easier to manage and done once. Fixes: aea6cb99703e ("regulator: resolve supply after creating regulator") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Tested-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> # stpmic1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/78c3d4016cebc08d441aad18cb924b4e4d9cf9df.1605226675.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-11-11Merge branch 'for-5.10' of ↵Mark Brown1-2/+5
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator into regulator-5.11
2020-11-10regulator: core: don't disable regulator if is_enabled return error.Pi-Hsun Shih1-2/+3
In regulator_late_cleanup when is_enabled failed, don't try to disable the regulator since it would likely to fail too and causing confusing error messages. Signed-off-by: Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201106064817.3290927-1-pihsun@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-11-03regulator: defer probe when trying to get voltage from unresolved supplyMichał Mirosław1-0/+2
regulator_get_voltage_rdev() is called in regulator probe() when applying machine constraints. The "fixed" commit exposed the problem that non-bypassed regulators can forward the request to its parent (like bypassed ones) supply. Return -EPROBE_DEFER when the supply is expected but not resolved yet. Fixes: aea6cb99703e ("regulator: resolve supply after creating regulator") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Reported-by: Ondřej Jirman <megous@megous.com> Reported-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> Tested-by: Ondřej Jirman <megous@megous.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a9041d68b4d35e4a2dd71629c8a6422662acb5ee.1604351936.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-28regulator: fix a kernel-doc markupMauro Carvalho Chehab1-1/+1
It seems that the function was renamed. kernel-doc markup should follow it. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/dffad16d4d6427d7d0fc89797e4126fe7c69d5de.1603469755.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-05Merge remote-tracking branch 'regulator/for-5.10' into regulator-nextMark Brown1-96/+143
2020-10-05regulator: Make constraint debug processing conditional on DEBUGGeert Uytterhoeven1-1/+12
If debugging is disabled, print_constraints() does not print the actual constraints, but still performs some processing and string formatting, only to throw away the result later. Fix this by moving all constraint debug processing to a separate function, and replacing it by a dummy when debugging is disabled. This reduces kernel size by almost 800 bytes (on arm/arm64). Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005131546.22448-1-geert+renesas@glider.be Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-01regulator: core: Enlarge max OF property name length to 64 charsAngeloGioacchino Del Regno1-2/+2
Some regulator drivers may be defining very long names: this is the case with the qcom_smd and qcom_spmi regulators, where we need to parse the regulator parents from DT. For clarity, this is an example: { "l13a", QCOM_SMD_RPM_LDOA, 13, &pm660_ht_lvpldo, "vdd_l8_l9_l10_l11_l12_l13_l14" }, pm660-regulators { ... vdd_l8_l9_l10_l11_l12_l13_l14-supply = <&vreg_s4a_2p04> ... }; Now, with a 32 characters limit, the function is trying to parse, exactly, "vdd_l8_l9_l10_l11_l12_l13_l14-s" (32 chars) instead of the right one, which is 37 chars long in this specific case. ... And this is not only the case with PM660/PM660L, but also with PMA8084, PM8916, PM8950 and others that are not implemented yet. The length of 64 chars was chosen based on the longest parsed property name that I could find, which is in PM8916, and would be 53 characters long. At that point, rounding that to 64 looked like being the best idea. Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200926125549.13191-2-kholk11@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-28regulator: resolve supply after creating regulatorMichał Mirosław1-8/+13
When creating a new regulator its supply cannot create the sysfs link because the device is not yet published. Remove early supply resolving since it will be done later anyway. This makes the following error disappear and the symlinks get created instead. DCDC_REG1: supplied by VSYS VSYS: could not add device link regulator.3 err -2 Note: It doesn't fix the problem for bypassed regulators, though. Fixes: 45389c47526d ("regulator: core: Add early supply resolution for regulators") Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ba09e0a8617ffeeb25cb4affffe6f3149319cef8.1601155770.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-28regulator: print symbolic errors in kernel messagesMichał Mirosław1-45/+49
Change all error-printing messages to include error name via %pe instead of numeric error or nothing. Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1dcf25f39188882eb56918a9aa281ab17b792aa5.1601155770.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-28regulator: print state at bootMichał Mirosław1-2/+7
Make the initial state of the regulator shown when debugging. Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/53c4f3d394d68f0989174f89e3b0882cebbbd787.1601155770.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-22regulator: fix indentation issueColin Ian King1-1/+1
There is a return statement that is indented with an extra space, fix this by removing it. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200920142454.33352-1-colin.king@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-21regulator: unexport regulator_lock/unlock()Michał Mirosław1-4/+2
regulator_lock/unlock() was used only to guard regulator_notifier_call_chain(). As no users remain, make the functions internal. Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d3381aabd2632aff5e7b839d55868bec6e85c811.1600550732.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-17Merge series "Support ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF PMICs" from Matti ↵Mark Brown1-1/+1
Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>: Initial support for ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF PMICs. These PMICs are primarily intended to be used to power the R-Car family processors. BD9576MUF includes some additional safety features the BD9573MUF does not have. This initial version of drivers does not utilize these features and for now the SW behaviour is identical. Please note that this version of drivers is only tested on BD9576MUF but according to the data-sheets the relevant parts of registers should be same so drivers should also work on BD9573MUF. This patch series includes MFD, watchdog and regulator drivers with basic functionality such as: - Enabling and pinging the watchdog - configuring watchog timeout / window from device-tree - reading regulator states/voltages - enabling/disabling VOUT1 (VD50) when control mode B is used. This patch series does not bring interrupt support. BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF are designed to keep the IRQ line low for whole duration of error condition. IRQ can't be 'acked'. So proper IRQ support would require some IRQ limiter implementation (delayed unmask?) in order to not hog the CPU. --- Matti Vaittinen (6): dt_bindings: mfd: Add ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF PMICs dt_bindings: regulator: Add ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF PMICs mfd: Support ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF wdt: Support wdt on ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF regulator: Support ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF MAINTAINERS: Add ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF drivers .../bindings/mfd/rohm,bd9576-pmic.yaml | 129 +++++++ .../regulator/rohm,bd9576-regulator.yaml | 33 ++ MAINTAINERS | 4 + drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 11 + drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c | 130 +++++++ drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 10 + drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 + drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c | 337 ++++++++++++++++++ drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/watchdog/Makefile | 1 + drivers/watchdog/bd9576_wdt.c | 295 +++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h | 61 ++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h | 2 + 14 files changed, 1028 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd9576-pmic.yaml create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/rohm,bd9576-regulator.yaml create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c create mode 100644 drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c create mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/bd9576_wdt.c create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h base-commit: f4d51dffc6c01a9e94650d95ce0104964f8ae822 -- 2.21.0 -- Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC Kiviharjunlenkki 1E 90220 OULU FINLAND ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ Simon says - in Latin please. ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
2020-09-11Merge tag 'regulator-fix-v5.9-rc4' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-83/+96
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator Pull regulator fixes from Mark Brown: "The biggest set of fixes here is those from Michał Mirosław fixing some locking issues with coupled regulators that are triggered in cases where a coupled regulator is used by a device involved in fs_reclaim like eMMC storage. These are relatively serious for the affected systems, though the circumstances where they trigger are very rare" * tag 'regulator-fix-v5.9-rc4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator: regulator: pwm: Fix machine constraints application regulator: core: Fix slab-out-of-bounds in regulator_unlock_recursive() regulator: remove superfluous lock in regulator_resolve_coupling() regulator: cleanup regulator_ena_gpio_free() regulator: plug of_node leak in regulator_register()'s error path regulator: push allocation in set_consumer_device_supply() out of lock regulator: push allocations in create_regulator() outside of lock regulator: push allocation in regulator_ena_gpio_request() out of lock regulator: push allocation in regulator_init_coupling() outside of lock regulator: fix spelling mistake "Cant" -> "Can't" regulator: cros-ec-regulator: Add NULL test for devm_kmemdup call
2020-09-07regulator: don't require mutex for regulator_notifier_call_chain()Michał Mirosław1-4/+1
Since 3801b86aa482 ("regulator: Refactor supply implementation to work as regular consumers") we no longer cascade notifications and so notifier head's built-in rwsem is enough to protect the notifier chain. Remove the requirement to fix one case where rdev->mutex might be forced to be taken recursively. Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5a0da9017c69a4dbc3f9b50f44476fce80a73387.1597032945.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-01regulator: core: Fix slab-out-of-bounds in regulator_unlock_recursive()Dmitry Osipenko1-6/+9
The recent commit 7d8196641ee1 ("regulator: Remove pointer table overallocation") changed the size of coupled_rdevs and now KASAN is able to detect slab-out-of-bounds problem in regulator_unlock_recursive(), which is a legit problem caused by a typo in the code. The recursive unlock function uses n_coupled value of a parent regulator for unlocking supply regulator, while supply's n_coupled should be used. In practice problem may only affect platforms that use coupled regulators. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.0+ Fixes: f8702f9e4aa7 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking") Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200831204335.19489-1-digetx@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-08-24treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keywordGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary fall-through markings when it is the case. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-08-18Merge series "regulator: fix deadlock vs memory reclaim" from Michał ↵Mark Brown1-73/+87
Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>: For systems that have eg. eMMC storage using voltage regulator, memory reclaim path might call back into regulator subsystem. This means we have to make sure no allocations happen with a regulator or regulator list locked. After this series I see no more lockdep complaints on my test system, but please review and test further. First four patches move allocations out of locked regions, next three came as a drive-by cleanups. --- v2: fix bug in patch #4 spotted by kernel test robot reworded commit #7 description Michał Mirosław (7): regulator: push allocation in regulator_init_coupling() outside of lock regulator: push allocation in regulator_ena_gpio_request() out of lock regulator: push allocations in create_regulator() outside of lock regulator: push allocation in set_consumer_device_supply() out of lock regulator: plug of_node leak in regulator_register()'s error path regulator: cleanup regulator_ena_gpio_free() regulator: remove superfluous lock in regulator_resolve_coupling() drivers/regulator/core.c | 164 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) -- 2.20.1
2020-08-18regulator: Remove pointer table overallocationMichał Mirosław1-5/+5
The code allocates sizeof(regulator_dev) for a pointer. Make it less generous. Let kcalloc() calculate the size, while at it. Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/407fbd06a02caf038a9ba3baa51c7d6d47cd6517.1597000795.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-08-18regulator: Avoid grabbing regulator lock during suspend/resumeStephen Boyd1-24/+51
I see it takes about 5us per regulator to grab the lock, check that this regulator isn't going to do anything for suspend, and then release the lock. When that is combined with PMICs that have dozens of regulators we get into a state where we spend a few miliseconds doing a bunch of locking operations synchronously to figure out that there's nothing to do. Let's reorganize the code here a bit so that we don't grab the lock until we're actually going to do something so that suspend is a little faster. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200804070837.1084024-1-swboyd@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-08-17regulator: remove superfluous lock in regulator_resolve_coupling()Michał Mirosław1-4/+0
The code modifies rdev, but locks c_rdev instead. Remove the lock as this is held together by regulator_list_mutex taken in the caller. Fixes: f9503385b187 ("regulator: core: Mutually resolve regulators coupling") Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/25eb81cefb37a646f3e44eaaf1d8ae8881cfde52.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-08-17regulator: cleanup regulator_ena_gpio_free()Michał Mirosław1-12/+12
Since only regulator_ena_gpio_request() allocates rdev->ena_pin, and it guarantees that same gpiod gets same pin structure, it is enough to compare just the pointers. Also we know there can be only one matching entry on the list. Rework the code take advantage of the facts. Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3ff002c7aa3bd774491af4291a9df23541fcf892.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-08-17regulator: plug of_node leak in regulator_register()'s error pathMichał Mirosław1-9/+4
By calling device_initialize() earlier and noting that kfree(NULL) is ok, we can save a bit of code in error handling and plug of_node leak. Fixed commit already did part of the work. Fixes: 9177514ce349 ("regulator: fix memory leak on error path of regulator_register()") Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> Acked-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f5035b1b4d40745e66bacd571bbbb5e4644d21a1.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-08-17regulator: push allocation in set_consumer_device_supply() out of lockMichał Mirosław1-20/+26
Pull regulator_list_mutex into set_consumer_device_supply() and keep allocations outside of it. Fourth of the fs_reclaim deadlock case. Fixes: 45389c47526d ("regulator: core: Add early supply resolution for regulators") Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f0380bdb3d60aeefa9693c4e234d2dcda7e56747.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-08-17regulator: push allocations in create_regulator() outside of lockMichał Mirosław1-25/+28
Move all allocations outside of the regulator_lock()ed section. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.7.13+ #535 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ f2fs_discard-179:7/702 is trying to acquire lock: c0e5d920 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x2c0 but task is already holding lock: cb95b080 (&dcc->cmd_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __issue_discard_cmd+0xec/0x5f8 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [...] -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.11+0x40/0x50 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x24/0x28 __kmalloc_track_caller+0x54/0x218 kstrdup+0x40/0x5c create_regulator+0xf4/0x368 regulator_resolve_supply+0x1a0/0x200 regulator_register+0x9c8/0x163c [...] other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: regulator_list_mutex --> &sit_i->sentry_lock --> &dcc->cmd_lock [...] Fixes: f8702f9e4aa7 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking") Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6eebc99b2474f4ffaa0405b15178ece0e7e4f608.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-08-17regulator: push allocation in regulator_ena_gpio_request() out of lockMichał Mirosław1-5/+14
Move another allocation out of regulator_list_mutex-protected region, as reclaim might want to take the same lock. WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.7.13+ #534 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/383 is trying to acquire lock: c0e5d920 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x2c0 but task is already holding lock: c0e38518 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x50 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.11+0x40/0x50 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x24/0x28 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x40/0x1e8 regulator_register+0x384/0x1630 devm_regulator_register+0x50/0x84 reg_fixed_voltage_probe+0x248/0x35c [...] other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(regulator_list_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(regulator_list_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** [...] 2 locks held by kswapd0/383: #0: c0e38518 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x50 #1: cb70e5e0 (hctx->srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: hctx_lock+0x60/0xb8 [...] Fixes: 541d052d7215 ("regulator: core: Only support passing enable GPIO descriptors") [this commit only changes context] Fixes: f8702f9e4aa7 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking") [this is when the regulator_list_mutex was introduced in reclaim locking path] Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/41fe6a9670335721b48e8f5195038c3d67a3bf92.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-08-17regulator: push allocation in regulator_init_coupling() outside of lockMichał Mirosław1-2/+3
Allocating memory with regulator_list_mutex held makes lockdep unhappy when memory pressure makes the system do fs_reclaim on eg. eMMC using a regulator. Push the lock inside regulator_init_coupling() after the allocation. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.7.13+ #533 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/383 is trying to acquire lock: cca78ca4 (&sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: __submit_merged_write_cond+0x104/0x154 but task is already holding lock: c0e38518 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x50 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.11+0x40/0x50 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x24/0x28 __kmalloc+0x54/0x218 regulator_register+0x860/0x1584 dummy_regulator_probe+0x60/0xa8 [...] other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem --> regulator_list_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(regulator_list_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by kswapd0/383: #0: c0e38518 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x50 [...] Fixes: d8ca7d184b33 ("regulator: core: Introduce API for regulators coupling customization") Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1a889cf7f61c6429c9e6b34ddcdde99be77a26b6.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-07-24regulator: fix memory leak on error path of regulator_register()Vladimir Zapolskiy1-11/+7
The change corrects registration and deregistration on error path of a regulator, the problem was manifested by a reported memory leak on deferred probe: as3722-regulator as3722-regulator: regulator 13 register failed -517 # cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak unreferenced object 0xecc43740 (size 64): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294937640 (age 712.880s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 72 65 67 75 6c 61 74 6f 72 2e 32 34 00 5a 5a 5a regulator.24.ZZZ 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ backtrace: [<0c4c3d1c>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x15c/0x2c0 [<40c0ad48>] kvasprintf+0x64/0xd4 [<109abd29>] kvasprintf_const+0x70/0x84 [<c4215946>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x34/0xa8 [<62282ea2>] dev_set_name+0x40/0x64 [<a39b6757>] regulator_register+0x3a4/0x1344 [<16a9543f>] devm_regulator_register+0x4c/0x84 [<51a4c6a1>] as3722_regulator_probe+0x294/0x754 ... The memory leak problem was introduced as a side ef another fix in regulator_register() error path, I believe that the proper fix is to decouple device_register() function into its two compounds and initialize a struct device before assigning any values to its fields and then using it before actual registration of a device happens. This lets to call put_device() safely after initialization, and, since now a release callback is called, kfree(rdev->constraints) shall be removed to exclude a double free condition. Fixes: a3cde9534ebd ("regulator: core: fix regulator_register() error paths to properly release rdev") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> Cc: Wen Yang <wenyang@linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724005013.23278-1-vz@mleia.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-07-20regulator: core: Add destroy_regulator()Saravana Kannan1-13/+21
Part of the regulator_get() code is already factored out into create_regulator(). This patch factors out some of the regulator_put() code into destroy_regulator() so that create_regulator() has a corresponding unwind function. Subsequent patches will use this function. Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200716042053.1927676-3-saravanak@google.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-07-15regulator: Allow regulators to verify enabled during enable()Sumit Semwal1-1/+62
Some regulators might need to verify that they have indeed been enabled after the enable() call is made and enable_time delay has passed. This is implemented by repeatedly checking is_enabled() upto poll_enabled_time, waiting for the already calculated enable delay in each iteration. Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200622124110.20971-2-sumit.semwal@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-05-29regulator: core: Add regulator bypass trace pointsCharles Keepax1-0/+9
Add new trace points for the start and end of enabling bypass on a regulator, to allow monitoring of when regulators are moved into bypass and how long that takes. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200529152216.9671-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-05-29Merge series "Fix regulators coupling for Exynos5800" from Marek Szyprowski ↵Mark Brown1-20/+29
<m.szyprowski@samsung.com>: Hi! This patchset is another attempt to fix the regulator coupling on Exynos5800/5422 SoCs. Here are links to the previous attempts: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/20191008101709.qVNy8eijBi0LynOteWFMnTg4GUwKG599n6OyYoX1Abs@z/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191017102758.8104-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/cover.1589528491.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200528131130.17984-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/ The problem is with "vdd_int" regulator coupled with "vdd_arm" on Odroid XU3/XU4 boards family. "vdd_arm" is handled by CPUfreq. "vdd_int" is handled by devfreq. CPUfreq initialized quite early during boot and it starts changing OPPs and "vdd_arm" value. Sometimes CPU activity during boot goes down and some low-frequency OPPs are selected, what in turn causes lowering "vdd_arm". This happens before devfreq applies its requirements on "vdd_int". Regulator balancing code reduces "vdd_arm" voltage value, what in turn causes lowering "vdd_int" value to the lowest possible value. This is much below the operation point of the wcore bus, which still runs at the highest frequency. The issue was hard to notice because in the most cases the board managed to boot properly, even when the regulator was set to lowest value allowed by the regulator constraints. However, it caused some random issues, which can be observed as "Unhandled prefetch abort" or low USB stability. Adding more and more special cases to the generic code has been rejected, so the only way to ensure the desired behavior on Exynos5800-based SoCs is to make a custom regulator coupler driver. Best regards, Marek Szyprowski Patch summary: Marek Szyprowski (2): regulator: extract voltage balancing code to separate function soc: samsung: Add simple voltage coupler for Exynos5800 arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/regulator/core.c | 49 ++++++++------- drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig | 3 + drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile | 1 + .../soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/regulator/coupler.h | 8 +++ 6 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c -- 2.17.1 base-commit: 8f3d9f354286745c751374f5f1fcafee6b3f3136
2020-05-29regulator: extract voltage balancing code to the separate functionMarek Szyprowski1-20/+29
Move the coupled regulators voltage balancing code to the separate function and allow to call it from the custom regulator couplers. Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200529124940.10675-2-m.szyprowski@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-05-20Merge series "MAINTAINER entries for few ROHM power devices" from Matti ↵Mark Brown1-14/+11
Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>: Add maintainer entries to a few ROHM devices and Linear Ranges Linear Ranges helpers were refactored out of regulator core to lib so that other drivers could utilize them too. (I guess power/supply drivers and possibly clk drivers can benefit from them). As regulators is currently the main user it makes sense the changes to linear_ranges go through Mark's tree. During past two years few ROHM PMIC drivers have been added to mainstream. They deserve a supporter from ROHM side too :) Patch 1: Maintainer entries for few ROHM IC drivers Patch 2: Maintainer entry for linear ranges helpers --- Matti Vaittinen (2): MAINTAINERS: Add entry for ROHM power management ICs MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer entry for linear ranges helper MAINTAINERS | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+) base-commit: b9bbe6ed63b2b9f2c9ee5cbd0f2c946a2723f4ce -- 2.21.0 -- Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC Kiviharjunlenkki 1E 90220 OULU FINLAND ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ Simon says - in Latin please. ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
2020-04-29regulator: Revert "Use driver_deferred_probe_timeout for ↵John Stultz1-14/+11
regulator_init_complete_work" This reverts commit dca0b44957e5 ("regulator: Use driver_deferred_probe_timeout for regulator_init_complete_work"), as we ended up reverting the default deferred_probe_timeout value back to zero, to preserve behavior with 5.6 we need to decouple the regulator timeout which was previously 30 seconds. This avoids breaking some systems that depend on the regulator timeout but don't require the deferred probe timeout. Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Suggested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200429172349.55979-1-john.stultz@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.0) at 2024-10-18 01:17:47 +0300