summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/regulator/vexpress-regulator.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-07-14regulator: Explicitly include correct DT includesRob Herring1-1/+2
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus. As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to explicitly include the correct includes. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230714174930.4063320-1-robh@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2023-03-20regulator: Set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS for drivers that existed in 4.14Douglas Anderson1-0/+1
Probing of regulators can be a slow operation and can contribute to slower boot times. This is especially true if a regulator is turned on at probe time (with regulator-boot-on or regulator-always-on) and the regulator requires delays (off-on-time, ramp time, etc). While the overall kernel is not ready to switch to async probe by default, as per the discussion on the mailing lists [1] it is believed that the regulator subsystem is in good shape and we can move regulator drivers over wholesale. There is no way to just magically opt in all regulators (regulators are just normal drivers like platform_driver), so we set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS for all regulators found in 'drivers/regulator' individually. Given the number of drivers touched and the impossibility to test this ahead of time, it wouldn't be shocking at all if this caused a regression for someone. If there is a regression caused by this patch, it's likely to be one of the cases talked about in [1]. As a "quick fix", drivers involved in the regression could be fixed by changing them to PROBE_FORCE_SYNCHRONOUS. That being said, the correct fix would be to directly fix the problem that caused the issue with async probe. The approach here follows a similar approach that was used for the mmc subsystem several years ago [2]. In fact, I ran nearly the same python script to auto-generate the changes. The only thing I changed was to search for "i2c_driver", "spmi_driver", and "spi_driver" in addition to "platform_driver". [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/06db017f-e985-4434-8d1d-02ca2100cca0@sirena.org.uk [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200903232441.2694866-1-dianders@chromium.org/ Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230316125351.1.I2a4677392a38db5758dee0788b2cea5872562a82@changeid Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-11-18regulator: vexpress: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() to simplify codezhengbin1-4/+1
Fixes coccicheck warning: drivers/regulator/vexpress-regulator.c:78:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1574074762-34629-1-git-send-email-zhengbin13@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-05-02regulator: vexpress: Switch to SPDX identifierAxel Lin1-12/+3
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-05-02regulator: vexpress: Get rid of struct vexpress_regulatorAxel Lin1-31/+22
The *regdev and *regmap can be replaced by local variables in probe(). Only desc of struct vexpress_regulator is really need, so just use struct regulator_desc directly and remove struct vexpress_regulator. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-04-11regulator: vexpress: Constify regulator_opsAxel Lin1-2/+2
vexpress_regulator_ops_ro and vexpress_regulator_ops are never changed, make them const. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2016-02-16regulator: vexpress: rename vexpress regulator implementationSudeep Holla1-0/+121
The vexpress regulator implementation is currently just called vexpress. This is a problem because it clashes with another module with the same name in hardware monitors. This patch renames the vexpress regulator implementation to vexpress-regulator so that there will be no clash in the module namespace. Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reported-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>