summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-06-19btrfs: move btrfs_check_trunc_cache_free_space into block-rsv.cJosef Bacik1-0/+2
This is completely related to block rsv's, move it out of the free space cache code and into block-rsv.c. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-04-17btrfs: simplify variables in btrfs_block_rsv_refill()Filipe Manana1-1/+1
At btrfs_block_rsv_refill(), there's no point in initializing the 'num_bytes' variable to 0 and then, after taking the block reserve's spinlock, initializing it to the value of the 'min_reserved' parameter. So just get rid of the 'num_bytes' local variable and rename the 'min_reserved' parameter to 'num_bytes'. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: simplify percent calculation helpers, rename div_factorDavid Sterba1-1/+1
The div_factor* helpers calculate fraction or percentage fraction. The name is a bit confusing, we use it only for percentage calculations and there are two helpers. There's a helper mult_frac that's for general fractions, that tries to be accurate but we multiply and divide by small numbers so we can use the div_u64 helper. Rename the div_factor* helpers and use 1..100 percentage range, also drop the case checking for percentage == 100, it's never hit. The conversions: * div_factor calculates tenths and the numbers need to be adjusted * div_factor_fine is direct replacement Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: add dependencies to fs.h and block-rsv.hJosef Bacik1-0/+1
There's several structures that are embedded inside of fs_info.h, so if we don't have all the proper includes when we include fs.h we'll get a variety of compile errors. I fixed this by adding a temporary c file that just had #include "fs.h" and then added include files until the compiler stopped complaining. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: remove unused btrfs_cond_migrate_bytesJosef Bacik1-3/+0
The last user of this was removed in 7f9fe6144076 ("btrfs: improve global reserve stealing logic"), drop this code as it's no longer called by anybody. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: add KCSAN annotations for unlocked access to block_rsv->fullDavid Sterba1-0/+9
KCSAN reports that there's unlocked access mixed with locked access, which is technically correct but is not a bug. To avoid false alerts at least from KCSAN, add annotation and use a wrapper whenever ->full is accessed for read outside of lock. It is used as a fast check and only advisory. In the worst case the block reserve is found !full and becomes full in the meantime, but properly handled. Depending on the value of ->full, btrfs_block_rsv_release decides where to return the reservation, and block_rsv_release_bytes handles a NULL pointer for block_rsv and if it's not NULL then it double checks the full status under a lock. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAAwBoOJDjei5Hnem155N_cJwiEkVwJYvgN-tQrwWbZQGhFU=cA@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/YvHU/vsXd7uz5V6j@hungrycats.org Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: use enum for btrfs_block_rsv::typeDavid Sterba1-5/+6
The number of block group reserve types BTRFS_BLOCK_RSV_* is small and fits to u8 and there's enough left in case we want to add more. For type safety use the enum but make it 8 bits in the structure to save space. The structure size is now 48 on release build, making a slight improvement in structures where it's embedded, like btrfs_fs_info or btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: switch btrfs_block_rsv::failfast to boolDavid Sterba1-1/+1
Use simple bool type for the block reserve failfast status, there's short to save space as there used to be int but there's no reason for that. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: switch btrfs_block_rsv::full to boolDavid Sterba1-1/+1
Use simple bool type for the block reserve full status, there's short to save space as there used to be int but there's no reason for that. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03btrfs: init root block_rsv at init root timeJosef Bacik1-0/+1
In the future we're going to have multiple csum and extent root trees, so init the roots block_rsv at setup_root time based on their root key objectid. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03btrfs: change root to fs_info for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytesJosef Bacik1-2/+2
We used to need the root for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes to check the orphan cleanup state, but we no longer need that, we simply need the fs_info. Change btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() to use the fs_info, and change both btrfs_block_rsv_refill() and btrfs_block_rsv_add() to do the same as they simply call btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() and then manipulate the block_rsv that is being used. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: Remove __ prefix from btrfs_block_rsv_releaseNikolay Borisov1-10/+2
Currently the non-prefixed version is a simple wrapper used to hide the 4th argument of the prefixed version. This doesn't bring much value in practice and only makes the code harder to follow by adding another level of indirection. Rectify this by removing the __ prefix and have only one public function to release bytes from a block reservation. No semantic changes. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: migrate the global_block_rsv helpers to block-rsv.cJosef Bacik1-0/+15
These helpers belong in block-rsv.c Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: export __btrfs_block_rsv_releaseJosef Bacik1-3/+10
The delalloc reserve stuff calls this directly because it cares about the qgroup accounting stuff, so export it so we can move it around. Fix btrfs_block_rsv_release() to just be a static inline since it just calls __btrfs_block_rsv_release() with NULL for the qgroup stuff. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: export btrfs_block_rsv_add_bytesJosef Bacik1-0/+2
This is used in a few places, we need to make sure it's exported so we can move it around. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: move btrfs_block_rsv definitions into it's own headerJosef Bacik1-0/+77
Prep work for separating out all of the block_rsv related code into its own file. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>