|
iostat_update_and_unbind_ctx()
Convert to use iostat_lat_type as parameter instead of raw number.
BTW, move NUM_PREALLOC_IOSTAT_CTXS to the header file, adjust
iostat_lat[{0,1,2}] to iostat_lat[{READ_IO,WRITE_SYNC_IO,WRITE_ASYNC_IO}]
in tracepoint function, and rename iotype to page_type to match the definition.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
|
Whenever we notice some sluggish issues on our machines, we are always
curious about how well all types of I/O in the f2fs filesystem are
handled. But, it's hard to get this kind of real data. First of all,
we need to reproduce the issue while turning on the profiling tool like
blktrace, but the issue doesn't happen again easily. Second, with the
intervention of any tools, the overall timing of the issue will be
slightly changed and it sometimes makes us hard to figure it out.
So, I added the feature printing out IO latency statistics tracepoint
events, which are minimal things to understand filesystem's I/O related
behaviors, into F2FS_IOSTAT kernel config. With "iostat_enable" sysfs
node on, we can get this statistics info in a periodic way and it
would cause the least overhead.
[samples]
f2fs_ckpt-254:1-507 [003] .... 2842.439683: f2fs_iostat_latency:
dev = (254,11), iotype [peak lat.(ms)/avg lat.(ms)/count],
rd_data [136/1/801], rd_node [136/1/1704], rd_meta [4/2/4],
wr_sync_data [164/16/3331], wr_sync_node [152/3/648],
wr_sync_meta [160/2/4243], wr_async_data [24/13/15],
wr_async_node [0/0/0], wr_async_meta [0/0/0]
f2fs_ckpt-254:1-507 [002] .... 2845.450514: f2fs_iostat_latency:
dev = (254,11), iotype [peak lat.(ms)/avg lat.(ms)/count],
rd_data [60/3/456], rd_node [60/3/1258], rd_meta [0/0/1],
wr_sync_data [120/12/2285], wr_sync_node [88/5/428],
wr_sync_meta [52/6/2990], wr_async_data [4/1/3],
wr_async_node [0/0/0], wr_async_meta [0/0/0]
Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
