| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Currently we have reference-counted per-net NSM RPC client
which created on the first monitor request and destroyed
after the last unmonitor request. It's needed because
RPC client need to know 'utsname()->nodename', but utsname()
might be NULL when nsm_unmonitor() called.
So instead of holding the rpc client we could just save nodename
in struct nlm_host and pass it to the rpc_create().
Thus ther is no need in keeping rpc client until last
unmonitor request. We could create separate RPC clients
for each monitor/unmonitor requests.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
Commit cb7323fffa85 ("lockd: create and use per-net NSM
RPC clients on MON/UNMON requests") introduced per-net
NSM RPC clients. Unfortunately this doesn't make any sense
without per-net nsm_handle.
E.g. the following scenario could happen
Two hosts (X and Y) in different namespaces (A and B) share
the same nsm struct.
1. nsm_monitor(host_X) called => NSM rpc client created,
nsm->sm_monitored bit set.
2. nsm_mointor(host-Y) called => nsm->sm_monitored already set,
we just exit. Thus in namespace B ln->nsm_clnt == NULL.
3. host X destroyed => nsm->sm_count decremented to 1
4. host Y destroyed => nsm_unmonitor() => nsm_mon_unmon() => NULL-ptr
dereference of *ln->nsm_clnt
So this could be fixed by making per-net nsm_handles list,
instead of global. Thus different net namespaces will not be able
share the same nsm_handle.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
Currently, all of the grace period handling is part of lockd. Eventually
though we'd like to be able to build v4-only servers, at which point
we'll need to put all of this elsewhere.
Move the code itself into fs/nfs_common and have it build a grace.ko
module. Then, rejigger the Kconfig options so that both nfsd and lockd
enable it automatically.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
|
|
NSM RPC client can be required on NFSv3 umount, when child reaper is dying (and
destroying it's mount namespace). It means, that current nsproxy is set to
NULL already, but creation of RPC client requires UTS namespace for gaining
hostname string.
This patch introduces reference counted NFS RPC clients creation and
destruction helpers (similar to RPCBIND RPC clients).
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
This patch introduces moves nrhosts in per-net data.
It also adds kernel warning to nlm_shutdown_hosts_net() about remaining hosts
in specified network namespace context.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
This patch moves next_gc to per-net data.
Note: passed network can be NULL (when Lockd kthread is exiting of Lockd
module is removing).
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
Lockd is going to be shared between network namespaces - i.e. going to be able
to handle lock requests from different network namespaces. This means, that
network namespace related resources have to be allocated not once (like now),
but for every network namespace context, from which service is requested to
operate.
This patch implements Lockd per-net users accounting. New per-net counter is
used to determine, when per-net resources have to be freed.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
|
