| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
When compiling with gcc version 14.0.0 20231126 (experimental)
and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, I've noticed the following:
In file included from ./include/linux/string.h:295,
from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:12,
from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:17,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:62,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53,
from ./include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:9,
from ./include/linux/preempt.h:79,
from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
from ./include/linux/wait.h:9,
from ./include/linux/wait_bit.h:8,
from ./include/linux/fs.h:6,
from fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c:18:
In function 'fortify_memcpy_chk',
inlined from '__SMB2_close' at fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c:3480:4:
./include/linux/fortify-string.h:588:25: warning: call to '__read_overflow2_field'
declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond size of field (2nd parameter);
maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning]
588 | __read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
and:
In file included from ./include/linux/string.h:295,
from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:12,
from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:17,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:62,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53,
from ./include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:9,
from ./include/linux/preempt.h:79,
from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
from ./include/linux/wait.h:9,
from ./include/linux/wait_bit.h:8,
from ./include/linux/fs.h:6,
from fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:17:
In function 'fortify_memcpy_chk',
inlined from 'CIFS_open' at fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:1248:3:
./include/linux/fortify-string.h:588:25: warning: call to '__read_overflow2_field'
declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond size of field (2nd parameter);
maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning]
588 | __read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In both cases, the fortification logic inteprets calls to 'memcpy()' as an
attempts to copy an amount of data which exceeds the size of the specified
field (i.e. more than 8 bytes from __le64 value) and thus issues an overread
warning. Both of these warnings may be silenced by using the convenient
'struct_group()' quirk.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
|
|
Reparse points are not limited to symlinks, so implement
->query_reparse_point() in order to handle different file types.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@manguebit.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
|
|
We need to specify charset, like "iocharset=utf-8", in mount options for
Chinese path if the nls_default don't support it, such as iso8859-1, the
default value for CONFIG_NLS_DEFAULT.
But now in reconnection the nls_default is used, instead of the one we
specified and used in mount, and this can lead to mount failure.
Signed-off-by: Winston Wen <wentao@uniontech.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
|
|
pSMB->hdr.Protocol is an array of size 4 bytes, hence when the compiler
analyzes this line of code
parm_data = ((char *) &pSMB->hdr.Protocol) + offset;
it legitimately complains about the fact that offset points outside the
bounds of the array. Notice that the compiler gives priority to the object
as an array, rather than merely the address of one more byte in a structure
to wich offset should be added (which seems to be the actual intention of
the original implementation).
Fix this by explicitly instructing the compiler to treat the code as a
sequence of bytes in struct smb_com_transaction2_spi_req, and not as an
array accessed through pointer notation.
Notice that ((char *)pSMB) + sizeof(pSMB->hdr.smb_buf_length) points to
the same address as ((char *) &pSMB->hdr.Protocol), therefore this results
in no differences in binary output.
Fixes the following -Wstringop-overflow warnings when built s390
architecture with defconfig (GCC 13):
CC [M] fs/smb/client/cifssmb.o
In function 'cifs_init_ace',
inlined from 'posix_acl_to_cifs' at fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:3046:3,
inlined from 'cifs_do_set_acl' at fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:3191:15:
fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:2987:31: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
2987 | cifs_ace->cifs_e_perm = local_ace->e_perm;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:27:
fs/smb/client/cifspdu.h: In function 'cifs_do_set_acl':
fs/smb/client/cifspdu.h:384:14: note: at offset [7, 11] into destination object 'Protocol' of size 4
384 | __u8 Protocol[4];
| ^~~~~~~~
In function 'cifs_init_ace',
inlined from 'posix_acl_to_cifs' at fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:3046:3,
inlined from 'cifs_do_set_acl' at fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:3191:15:
fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:2988:30: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
2988 | cifs_ace->cifs_e_tag = local_ace->e_tag;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/smb/client/cifspdu.h: In function 'cifs_do_set_acl':
fs/smb/client/cifspdu.h:384:14: note: at offset [6, 10] into destination object 'Protocol' of size 4
384 | __u8 Protocol[4];
| ^~~~~~~~
This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable
-Wstringop-overflow.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/310
Fixes: dc1af4c4b472 ("cifs: implement set acl method")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
|
|
This fixes the following warning reported by kernel test robot
fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:4216 CIFSFindNext() warn: missing error
code? 'rc'
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202306170124.CtQqzf0I-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@manguebit.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
|
|
This fixes the following warning reported by kernel test robot
fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:4089 CIFSFindFirst() warn: missing error
code? 'rc'
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202306170124.CtQqzf0I-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@manguebit.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
|
|
Move CIFS/SMB3 related client and server files (cifs.ko and ksmbd.ko
and helper modules) to new fs/smb subdirectory:
fs/cifs --> fs/smb/client
fs/ksmbd --> fs/smb/server
fs/smbfs_common --> fs/smb/common
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
|
