summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/ubifs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-03-11ubifs: ubifs_writepage: Mark page dirty after writing inode failedZhihao Cheng1-3/+9
[ Upstream commit fb8bc4c74ae4526d9489362ab2793a936d072b84 ] There are two states for ubifs writing pages: 1. Dirty, Private 2. Not Dirty, Not Private There is a third possibility which maybe related to [1] that page is private but not dirty caused by following process: PA lock(page) ubifs_write_end attach_page_private // set Private __set_page_dirty_nobuffers // set Dirty unlock(page) write_cache_pages lock(page) clear_page_dirty_for_io(page) // clear Dirty ubifs_writepage write_inode // fail, goto out, following codes are not executed // do_writepage // set_page_writeback // set Writeback // detach_page_private // clear Private // end_page_writeback // clear Writeback out: unlock(page) // Private, Not Dirty PB ksys_fadvise64_64 generic_fadvise invalidate_inode_page // page is neither Dirty nor Writeback invalidate_complete_page // page_has_private is true try_to_release_page ubifs_releasepage ubifs_assert(c, 0) !!! Then we may get following assertion failed: UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 1492): ubifs_assert_failed [ubifs]: UBIFS assert failed: 0, in fs/ubifs/file.c:1499 UBIFS warning (ubi0:0 pid 1492): ubifs_ro_mode [ubifs]: switched to read-only mode, error -22 CPU: 2 PID: 1492 Comm: aa Not tainted 5.16.0-rc2-00012-g7bb767dee0ba-dirty Call Trace: dump_stack+0x13/0x1b ubifs_ro_mode+0x54/0x60 [ubifs] ubifs_assert_failed+0x4b/0x80 [ubifs] ubifs_releasepage+0x7e/0x1e0 [ubifs] try_to_release_page+0x57/0xe0 invalidate_inode_page+0xfb/0x130 invalidate_mapping_pagevec+0x12/0x20 generic_fadvise+0x303/0x3c0 vfs_fadvise+0x35/0x40 ksys_fadvise64_64+0x4c/0xb0 Jump [2] to find a reproducer. [1] https://linux-mtd.infradead.narkive.com/NQoBeT1u/patch-rfc-ubifs-fix-assert-failed-in-ubifs-set-page-dirty [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215357 Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac0 ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-11ubifs: dirty_cow_znode: Fix memleak in error handling pathZhihao Cheng1-1/+8
[ Upstream commit 122deabfe1428bffe95e2bf364ff8a5059bdf089 ] Following process will cause a memleak for copied up znode: dirty_cow_znode zn = copy_znode(c, znode); err = insert_old_idx(c, zbr->lnum, zbr->offs); if (unlikely(err)) return ERR_PTR(err); // No one refers to zn. Fix it by adding copied znode back to tnc, then it will be freed by ubifs_destroy_tnc_subtree() while closing tnc. Fetch a reproducer in [Link]. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216705 Fixes: 1e51764a3c2a ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-11ubifs: Re-statistic cleaned znode count if commit failedZhihao Cheng1-0/+15
[ Upstream commit 944e096aa24071d3fe22822f6249d3ae309e39ea ] Dirty znodes will be written on flash in committing process with following states: process A | znode state ------------------------------------------------------ do_commit | DIRTY_ZNODE ubifs_tnc_start_commit | DIRTY_ZNODE get_znodes_to_commit | DIRTY_ZNODE | COW_ZNODE layout_commit | DIRTY_ZNODE | COW_ZNODE fill_gap | 0 write master | 0 or OBSOLETE_ZNODE process B | znode state ------------------------------------------------------ do_commit | DIRTY_ZNODE[1] ubifs_tnc_start_commit | DIRTY_ZNODE get_znodes_to_commit | DIRTY_ZNODE | COW_ZNODE ubifs_tnc_end_commit | DIRTY_ZNODE | COW_ZNODE write_index | 0 write master | 0 or OBSOLETE_ZNODE[2] or | DIRTY_ZNODE[3] [1] znode is dirtied without concurrent committing process [2] znode is copied up (re-dirtied by other process) before cleaned up in committing process [3] znode is re-dirtied after cleaned up in committing process Currently, the clean znode count is updated in free_obsolete_znodes(), which is called only in normal path. If do_commit failed, clean znode count won't be updated, which triggers a failure ubifs assertion[4] in ubifs_tnc_close(): ubifs_assert_failed [ubifs]: UBIFS assert failed: freed == n [4] Commit 380347e9ca7682 ("UBIFS: Add an assertion for clean_zn_cnt"). Fix it by re-statisticing cleaned znode count in tnc_destroy_cnext(). Fetch a reproducer in [Link]. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216704 Fixes: 1e51764a3c2a ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-11ubifs: Fix memory leak in alloc_wbufs()Li Zetao1-4/+13
[ Upstream commit 4a1ff3c5d04b9079b4f768d9a71b51c4af578dd2 ] kmemleak reported a sequence of memory leaks, and show them as following: unreferenced object 0xffff8881575f8400 (size 1024): comm "mount", pid 19625, jiffies 4297119604 (age 20.383s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff8176cecd>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x150 [<ffffffffa0406b2b>] ubifs_mount+0x307b/0x7170 [ubifs] [<ffffffff819fa8fd>] legacy_get_tree+0xed/0x1d0 [<ffffffff81936f2d>] vfs_get_tree+0x7d/0x230 [<ffffffff819b2bd4>] path_mount+0xdd4/0x17b0 [<ffffffff819b37aa>] __x64_sys_mount+0x1fa/0x270 [<ffffffff83c14295>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 [<ffffffff83e0006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 unreferenced object 0xffff8881798a6e00 (size 512): comm "mount", pid 19677, jiffies 4297121912 (age 37.816s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk backtrace: [<ffffffff8176cecd>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x150 [<ffffffffa0418342>] ubifs_wbuf_init+0x52/0x480 [ubifs] [<ffffffffa0406ca5>] ubifs_mount+0x31f5/0x7170 [ubifs] [<ffffffff819fa8fd>] legacy_get_tree+0xed/0x1d0 [<ffffffff81936f2d>] vfs_get_tree+0x7d/0x230 [<ffffffff819b2bd4>] path_mount+0xdd4/0x17b0 [<ffffffff819b37aa>] __x64_sys_mount+0x1fa/0x270 [<ffffffff83c14295>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 [<ffffffff83e0006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 The problem is that the ubifs_wbuf_init() returns an error in the loop which in the alloc_wbufs(), then the wbuf->buf and wbuf->inodes that were successfully alloced before are not freed. Fix it by adding error hanging path in alloc_wbufs() which frees the memory alloced before when ubifs_wbuf_init() returns an error. Fixes: 1e51764a3c2a ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-11ubifs: Reserve one leb for each journal head while doing budgetZhihao Cheng1-4/+3
[ Upstream commit e874dcde1cbf82c786c0e7f2899811c02630cc52 ] UBIFS calculates available space by c->main_bytes - c->lst.total_used (which means non-index lebs' free and dirty space is accounted into total available), then index lebs and four lebs (one for gc_lnum, one for deletions, two for journal heads) are deducted. In following situation, ubifs may get -ENOSPC from make_reservation(): LEB 84: DATAHD free 122880 used 1920 dirty 2176 dark 6144 LEB 110:DELETION free 126976 used 0 dirty 0 dark 6144 (empty) LEB 201:gc_lnum free 126976 used 0 dirty 0 dark 6144 LEB 272:GCHD free 77824 used 47672 dirty 1480 dark 6144 LEB 356:BASEHD free 0 used 39776 dirty 87200 dark 6144 OTHERS: index lebs, zero-available non-index lebs UBIFS calculates the available bytes is 6888 (How to calculate it: 126976 * 5[remain main bytes] - 1920[used] - 47672[used] - 39776[used] - 126976 * 1[deletions] - 126976 * 1[gc_lnum] - 126976 * 2[journal heads] - 6144 * 5[dark] = 6888) after doing budget, however UBIFS cannot use BASEHD's dirty space(87200), because UBIFS cannot find next BASEHD to reclaim current BASEHD. (c->bi.min_idx_lebs equals to c->lst.idx_lebs, the empty leb won't be found by ubifs_find_free_space(), and dirty index lebs won't be picked as gced lebs. All non-index lebs has dirty space less then c->dead_wm, non-index lebs won't be picked as gced lebs either. So new free lebs won't be produced.). See more details in Link. To fix it, reserve one leb for each journal head while doing budget. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216562 Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac0 ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-11ubifs: do_rename: Fix wrong space budget when target inode's nlink > 1Zhihao Cheng1-0/+2
[ Upstream commit 25fce616a61fc2f1821e4a9ce212d0e064707093 ] If target inode is a special file (eg. block/char device) with nlink count greater than 1, the inode with ui->data will be re-written on disk. However, UBIFS losts target inode's data_len while doing space budget. Bad space budget may let make_reservation() return with -ENOSPC, which could turn ubifs to read-only mode in do_writepage() process. Fetch a reproducer in [Link]. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216494 Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac0 ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-11ubifs: Fix wrong dirty space budget for dirty inodeZhihao Cheng1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit b248eaf049d9cdc5eb76b59399e4d3de233f02ac ] Each dirty inode should reserve 'c->bi.inode_budget' bytes in space budget calculation. Currently, space budget for dirty inode reports more space than what UBIFS actually needs to write. Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac0 ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-11ubifs: Rectify space budget for ubifs_xrename()Zhihao Cheng1-0/+5
[ Upstream commit 1b2ba09060e41adb356b9ae58ef94a7390928004 ] There is no space budget for ubifs_xrename(). It may let make_reservation() return with -ENOSPC, which could turn ubifs to read-only mode in do_writepage() process. Fix it by adding space budget for ubifs_xrename(). Fetch a reproducer in [Link]. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216569 Fixes: 9ec64962afb170 ("ubifs: Implement RENAME_EXCHANGE") Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-11ubifs: Rectify space budget for ubifs_symlink() if symlink is encryptedZhihao Cheng1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit c2c36cc6ca23e614f9e4238d0ecf48549ee9002a ] Fix bad space budget when symlink file is encrypted. Bad space budget may let make_reservation() return with -ENOSPC, which could turn ubifs to read-only mode in do_writepage() process. Fetch a reproducer in [Link]. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216490 Fixes: ca7f85be8d6cf9 ("ubifs: Add support for encrypted symlinks") Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-03-11ubifs: Fix build errors as symbol undefinedLi Hua1-0/+5
[ Upstream commit aa6d148e6d6270274e3d5a529b71c54cd329d17f ] With CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_AUTHENTICATION not set, the compiler can assume that ubifs_node_check_hash() is never true and drops the call to ubifs_bad_hash(). Is CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE enabled this optimization does not happen anymore. So When CONFIG_UBIFS_FS and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE is enabled but CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_AUTHENTICATION is not set, the build errors is as followd: ERROR: modpost: "ubifs_bad_hash" [fs/ubifs/ubifs.ko] undefined! Fix it by add no-op ubifs_bad_hash() for the CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_AUTHENTICATION=n case. Fixes: 16a26b20d2af ("ubifs: authentication: Add hashes to index nodes") Signed-off-by: Li Hua <hucool.lihua@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-04-13ubifs: Rectify space amount budget for mkdir/tmpfile operationsZhihao Cheng1-4/+8
[ Upstream commit a6dab6607d4681d227905d5198710b575dbdb519 ] UBIFS should make sure the flash has enough space to store dirty (Data that is newer than disk) data (in memory), space budget is exactly designed to do that. If space budget calculates less data than we need, 'make_reservation()' will do more work(return -ENOSPC if no free space lelf, sometimes we can see "cannot reserve xxx bytes in jhead xxx, error -28" in ubifs error messages) with ubifs inodes locked, which may effect other syscalls. A simple way to decide how much space do we need when make a budget: See how much space is needed by 'make_reservation()' in ubifs_jnl_xxx() function according to corresponding operation. It's better to report ENOSPC in ubifs_budget_space(), as early as we can. Fixes: 474b93704f32163 ("ubifs: Implement O_TMPFILE") Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac05 ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-04-08ubifs: rename_whiteout: correct old_dir size computingBaokun Li1-0/+3
commit 705757274599e2e064dd3054aabc74e8af31a095 upstream. When renaming the whiteout file, the old whiteout file is not deleted. Therefore, we add the old dentry size to the old dir like XFS. Otherwise, an error may be reported due to `fscki->calc_sz != fscki->size` in check_indes. Fixes: 9e0a1fff8db56ea ("ubifs: Implement RENAME_WHITEOUT") Reported-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-04-08ubifs: Fix to add refcount once page is set privateZhihao Cheng1-7/+7
commit 3b67db8a6ca83e6ff90b756d3da0c966f61cd37b upstream. MM defined the rule [1] very clearly that once page was set with PG_private flag, we should increment the refcount in that page, also main flows like pageout(), migrate_page() will assume there is one additional page reference count if page_has_private() returns true. Otherwise, we may get a BUG in page migration: page:0000000080d05b9d refcount:-1 mapcount:0 mapping:000000005f4d82a8 index:0xe2 pfn:0x14c12 aops:ubifs_file_address_operations [ubifs] ino:8f1 dentry name:"f30e" flags: 0x1fffff80002405(locked|uptodate|owner_priv_1|private|node=0| zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page) != 0) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at include/linux/page_ref.h:184! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 3 PID: 38 Comm: kcompactd0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc5 RIP: 0010:migrate_page_move_mapping+0xac3/0xe70 Call Trace: ubifs_migrate_page+0x22/0xc0 [ubifs] move_to_new_page+0xb4/0x600 migrate_pages+0x1523/0x1cc0 compact_zone+0x8c5/0x14b0 kcompactd+0x2bc/0x560 kthread+0x18c/0x1e0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Before the time, we should make clean a concept, what does refcount means in page gotten from grab_cache_page_write_begin(). There are 2 situations: Situation 1: refcount is 3, page is created by __page_cache_alloc. TYPE_A - the write process is using this page TYPE_B - page is assigned to one certain mapping by calling __add_to_page_cache_locked() TYPE_C - page is added into pagevec list corresponding current cpu by calling lru_cache_add() Situation 2: refcount is 2, page is gotten from the mapping's tree TYPE_B - page has been assigned to one certain mapping TYPE_A - the write process is using this page (by calling page_cache_get_speculative()) Filesystem releases one refcount by calling put_page() in xxx_write_end(), the released refcount corresponds to TYPE_A (write task is using it). If there are any processes using a page, page migration process will skip the page by judging whether expected_page_refs() equals to page refcount. The BUG is caused by following process: PA(cpu 0) kcompactd(cpu 1) compact_zone ubifs_write_begin page_a = grab_cache_page_write_begin add_to_page_cache_lru lru_cache_add pagevec_add // put page into cpu 0's pagevec (refcnf = 3, for page creation process) ubifs_write_end SetPagePrivate(page_a) // doesn't increase page count ! unlock_page(page_a) put_page(page_a) // refcnt = 2 [...] PB(cpu 0) filemap_read filemap_get_pages add_to_page_cache_lru lru_cache_add __pagevec_lru_add // traverse all pages in cpu 0's pagevec __pagevec_lru_add_fn SetPageLRU(page_a) isolate_migratepages isolate_migratepages_block get_page_unless_zero(page_a) // refcnt = 3 list_add(page_a, from_list) migrate_pages(from_list) __unmap_and_move move_to_new_page ubifs_migrate_page(page_a) migrate_page_move_mapping expected_page_refs get 3 (migration[1] + mapping[1] + private[1]) release_pages put_page_testzero(page_a) // refcnt = 3 page_ref_freeze // refcnt = 0 page_ref_dec_and_test(0 - 1 = -1) page_ref_unfreeze VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(-1 != 0, page) UBIFS doesn't increase the page refcount after setting private flag, which leads to page migration task believes the page is not used by any other processes, so the page is migrated. This causes concurrent accessing on page refcount between put_page() called by other process(eg. read process calls lru_cache_add) and page_ref_unfreeze() called by migration task. Actually zhangjun has tried to fix this problem [2] by recalculating page refcnt in ubifs_migrate_page(). It's better to follow MM rules [1], because just like Kirill suggested in [2], we need to check all users of page_has_private() helper. Like f2fs does in [3], fix it by adding/deleting refcount when setting/clearing private for a page. BTW, according to [4], we set 'page->private' as 1 because ubifs just simply SetPagePrivate(). And, [5] provided a common helper to set/clear page private, ubifs can use this helper following the example of iomap, afs, btrfs, etc. Jump [6] to find a reproducer. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2b19b3c4-2bc4-15fa-15cc-27a13e5c7af1@aol.com [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mtd/msg04018.html [3] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1903.0/03313.html [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20210422154705.GO3596236@casper.infradead.org [5] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200517214718.468-1-guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com [6] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214961 Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac0 ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-04-08ubifs: Fix read out-of-bounds in ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock()Zhihao Cheng1-4/+30
commit 4f2262a334641e05f645364d5ade1f565c85f20b upstream. Function ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock() may access buf out of bounds in following process: ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock(): aligned_len = ALIGN(len, 8); // Assume len = 4089, aligned_len = 4096 if (aligned_len <= wbuf->avail) ... // Not satisfy if (wbuf->used) { ubifs_leb_write() // Fill some data in avail wbuf len -= wbuf->avail; // len is still not 8-bytes aligned aligned_len -= wbuf->avail; } n = aligned_len >> c->max_write_shift; if (n) { n <<= c->max_write_shift; err = ubifs_leb_write(c, wbuf->lnum, buf + written, wbuf->offs, n); // n > len, read out of bounds less than 8(n-len) bytes } , which can be catched by KASAN: ========================================================= BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecc_sw_hamming_calculate+0x1dc/0x7d0 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888105594ff8 by task kworker/u8:4/128 Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-ubifs_0_0) Call Trace: kasan_report.cold+0x81/0x165 nand_write_page_swecc+0xa9/0x160 ubifs_leb_write+0xf2/0x1b0 [ubifs] ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock+0x421/0x12c0 [ubifs] write_head+0xdc/0x1c0 [ubifs] ubifs_jnl_write_inode+0x627/0x960 [ubifs] wb_workfn+0x8af/0xb80 Function ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock() accepts that parameter 'len' is not 8 bytes aligned, the 'len' represents the true length of buf (which is allocated in 'ubifs_jnl_xxx', eg. ubifs_jnl_write_inode), so ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock() must handle the length read from 'buf' carefully to write leb safely. Fetch a reproducer in [Link]. Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac0 ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214785 Reported-by: Chengsong Ke <kechengsong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-04-08ubifs: setflags: Make dirtied_ino_d 8 bytes alignedZhihao Cheng1-1/+1
commit 1b83ec057db16b4d0697dc21ef7a9743b6041f72 upstream. Make 'ui->data_len' aligned with 8 bytes before it is assigned to dirtied_ino_d. Since 8871d84c8f8b0c6b("ubifs: convert to fileattr") applied, 'setflags()' only affects regular files and directories, only xattr inode, symlink inode and special inode(pipe/char_dev/block_dev) have none- zero 'ui->data_len' field, so assertion '!(req->dirtied_ino_d & 7)' cannot fail in ubifs_budget_space(). To avoid assertion fails in future evolution(eg. setflags can operate special inodes), it's better to make dirtied_ino_d 8 bytes aligned, after all aligned size is still zero for regular files. Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac05a ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-04-08ubifs: Add missing iput if do_tmpfile() failed in rename whiteoutZhihao Cheng1-0/+2
commit 716b4573026bcbfa7b58ed19fe15554bac66b082 upstream. whiteout inode should be put when do_tmpfile() failed if inode has been initialized. Otherwise we will get following warning during umount: UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 1494): ubifs_assert_failed [ubifs]: UBIFS assert failed: c->bi.dd_growth == 0, in fs/ubifs/super.c:1930 VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of ubifs. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Fixes: 9e0a1fff8db56ea ("ubifs: Implement RENAME_WHITEOUT") Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Suggested-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-04-08ubifs: Fix deadlock in concurrent rename whiteout and inode writebackZhihao Cheng1-10/+15
commit afd427048047e8efdedab30e8888044e2be5aa9c upstream. Following hung tasks: [ 77.028764] task:kworker/u8:4 state:D stack: 0 pid: 132 [ 77.028820] Call Trace: [ 77.029027] schedule+0x8c/0x1b0 [ 77.029067] mutex_lock+0x50/0x60 [ 77.029074] ubifs_write_inode+0x68/0x1f0 [ubifs] [ 77.029117] __writeback_single_inode+0x43c/0x570 [ 77.029128] writeback_sb_inodes+0x259/0x740 [ 77.029148] wb_writeback+0x107/0x4d0 [ 77.029163] wb_workfn+0x162/0x7b0 [ 92.390442] task:aa state:D stack: 0 pid: 1506 [ 92.390448] Call Trace: [ 92.390458] schedule+0x8c/0x1b0 [ 92.390461] wb_wait_for_completion+0x82/0xd0 [ 92.390469] __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0xb2/0x110 [ 92.390472] writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x14/0x20 [ 92.390476] ubifs_budget_space+0x705/0xdd0 [ubifs] [ 92.390503] do_rename.cold+0x7f/0x187 [ubifs] [ 92.390549] ubifs_rename+0x8b/0x180 [ubifs] [ 92.390571] vfs_rename+0xdb2/0x1170 [ 92.390580] do_renameat2+0x554/0x770 , are caused by concurrent rename whiteout and inode writeback processes: rename_whiteout(Thread 1) wb_workfn(Thread2) ubifs_rename do_rename lock_4_inodes (Hold ui_mutex) ubifs_budget_space make_free_space shrink_liability __writeback_inodes_sb_nr bdi_split_work_to_wbs (Queue new wb work) wb_do_writeback(wb work) __writeback_single_inode ubifs_write_inode LOCK(ui_mutex) ↑ wb_wait_for_completion (Wait wb work) <-- deadlock! Reproducer (Detail program in [Link]): 1. SYS_renameat2("/mp/dir/file", "/mp/dir/whiteout", RENAME_WHITEOUT) 2. Consume out of space before kernel(mdelay) doing budget for whiteout Fix it by doing whiteout space budget before locking ubifs inodes. BTW, it also fixes wrong goto tag 'out_release' in whiteout budget error handling path(It should at least recover dir i_size and unlock 4 ubifs inodes). Fixes: 9e0a1fff8db56ea ("ubifs: Implement RENAME_WHITEOUT") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214733 Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-04-08ubifs: rename_whiteout: Fix double free for whiteout_ui->dataZhihao Cheng1-2/+0
commit 40a8f0d5e7b3999f096570edab71c345da812e3e upstream. 'whiteout_ui->data' will be freed twice if space budget fail for rename whiteout operation as following process: rename_whiteout dev = kmalloc whiteout_ui->data = dev kfree(whiteout_ui->data) // Free first time iput(whiteout) ubifs_free_inode kfree(ui->data) // Double free! KASAN reports: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: double-free or invalid-free in ubifs_free_inode+0x4f/0x70 Call Trace: kfree+0x117/0x490 ubifs_free_inode+0x4f/0x70 [ubifs] i_callback+0x30/0x60 rcu_do_batch+0x366/0xac0 __do_softirq+0x133/0x57f Allocated by task 1506: kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x3c2/0x7a0 do_rename+0x9b7/0x1150 [ubifs] ubifs_rename+0x106/0x1f0 [ubifs] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 Freed by task 1506: kfree+0x117/0x490 do_rename.cold+0x53/0x8a [ubifs] ubifs_rename+0x106/0x1f0 [ubifs] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88810238bed8 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8 ================================================================== Let ubifs_free_inode() free 'whiteout_ui->data'. BTW, delete unused assignment 'whiteout_ui->data_len = 0', process 'ubifs_evict_inode() -> ubifs_jnl_delete_inode() -> ubifs_jnl_write_inode()' doesn't need it (because 'inc_nlink(whiteout)' won't be excuted by 'goto out_release', and the nlink of whiteout inode is 0). Fixes: 9e0a1fff8db56ea ("ubifs: Implement RENAME_WHITEOUT") Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-01-27ubifs: Error path in ubifs_remount_rw() seems to wrongly free write buffersPetr Cvachoucek1-1/+0
commit 3fea4d9d160186617ff40490ae01f4f4f36b28ff upstream. it seems freeing the write buffers in the error path of the ubifs_remount_rw() is wrong. It leads later to a kernel oops like this: [10016.431274] UBIFS (ubi0:0): start fixing up free space [10090.810042] UBIFS (ubi0:0): free space fixup complete [10090.814623] UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 512): ubifs_remount_fs: cannot spawn "ubifs_bgt0_0", error -4 [10101.915108] UBIFS (ubi0:0): background thread "ubifs_bgt0_0" started, PID 517 [10105.275498] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000030 [10105.284352] Mem abort info: [10105.287160] ESR = 0x96000006 [10105.290252] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [10105.295592] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [10105.298652] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [10105.301848] Data abort info: [10105.304723] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006 [10105.308573] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [10105.311564] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000000f03d1000 [10105.318034] [0000000000000030] pgd=00000000f6cee003, pud=00000000f4884003, pmd=0000000000000000 [10105.326783] Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [10105.332355] Modules linked in: ath10k_pci ath10k_core ath mac80211 libarc4 cfg80211 nvme nvme_core cryptodev(O) [10105.342468] CPU: 3 PID: 518 Comm: touch Tainted: G O 5.4.3 #1 [10105.349517] Hardware name: HYPEX CPU (DT) [10105.353525] pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO) [10105.358324] pc : atomic64_try_cmpxchg_acquire.constprop.22+0x8/0x34 [10105.364596] lr : mutex_lock+0x1c/0x34 [10105.368253] sp : ffff000075633aa0 [10105.371563] x29: ffff000075633aa0 x28: 0000000000000001 [10105.376874] x27: ffff000076fa80c8 x26: 0000000000000004 [10105.382185] x25: 0000000000000030 x24: 0000000000000000 [10105.387495] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000038 [10105.392807] x21: 000000000000000c x20: ffff000076fa80c8 [10105.398119] x19: ffff000076fa8000 x18: 0000000000000000 [10105.403429] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [10105.408741] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: fefefefefefefeff [10105.414052] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000fe0 [10105.419364] x11: 0000000000000fe0 x10: ffff000076709020 [10105.424675] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 00000000000000a0 [10105.429986] x7 : ffff000076fa80f4 x6 : 0000000000000030 [10105.435297] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 [10105.440609] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : ffff00006f276040 [10105.445920] x1 : ffff000075633ab8 x0 : 0000000000000030 [10105.451232] Call trace: [10105.453676] atomic64_try_cmpxchg_acquire.constprop.22+0x8/0x34 [10105.459600] ubifs_garbage_collect+0xb4/0x334 [10105.463956] ubifs_budget_space+0x398/0x458 [10105.468139] ubifs_create+0x50/0x180 [10105.471712] path_openat+0x6a0/0x9b0 [10105.475284] do_filp_open+0x34/0x7c [10105.478771] do_sys_open+0x78/0xe4 [10105.482170] __arm64_sys_openat+0x1c/0x24 [10105.486180] el0_svc_handler+0x84/0xc8 [10105.489928] el0_svc+0x8/0xc [10105.492808] Code: 52800013 17fffffb d2800003 f9800011 (c85ffc05) [10105.498903] ---[ end trace 46b721d93267a586 ]--- To reproduce the problem: 1. Filesystem initially mounted read-only, free space fixup flag set. 2. mount -o remount,rw <mountpoint> 3. it takes some time (free space fixup running) ... try to terminate running mount by CTRL-C ... does not respond, only after free space fixup is complete ... then "ubifs_remount_fs: cannot spawn "ubifs_bgt0_0", error -4" 4. mount -o remount,rw <mountpoint> ... now finished instantly (fixup already done). 5. Create file or just unmount the filesystem and we get the oops. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: b50b9f408502 ("UBIFS: do not free write-buffers when in R/O mode") Signed-off-by: Petr Cvachoucek <cvachoucek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-30treewide: Change list_sort to use const pointersSami Tolvanen2-5/+6
[ Upstream commit 4f0f586bf0c898233d8f316f471a21db2abd522d ] list_sort() internally casts the comparison function passed to it to a different type with constant struct list_head pointers, and uses this pointer to call the functions, which trips indirect call Control-Flow Integrity (CFI) checking. Instead of removing the consts, this change defines the list_cmp_func_t type and changes the comparison function types of all list_sort() callers to use const pointers, thus avoiding type mismatches. Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210408182843.1754385-10-samitolvanen@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-09-08ubifs: report correct st_size for encrypted symlinksEric Biggers1-1/+11
commit 064c734986011390b4d111f1a99372b7f26c3850 upstream. The stat() family of syscalls report the wrong size for encrypted symlinks, which has caused breakage in several userspace programs. Fix this by calling fscrypt_symlink_getattr() after ubifs_getattr() for encrypted symlinks. This function computes the correct size by reading and decrypting the symlink target (if it's not already cached). For more details, see the commit which added fscrypt_symlink_getattr(). Fixes: ca7f85be8d6c ("ubifs: Add support for encrypted symlinks") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210702065350.209646-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-07-20ubifs: Set/Clear I_LINKABLE under i_lock for whiteout inodeZhihao Cheng1-0/+7
[ Upstream commit a801fcfeef96702fa3f9b22ad56c5eb1989d9221 ] xfstests-generic/476 reports a warning message as below: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 30347 at fs/inode.c:361 inc_nlink+0x52/0x70 Call Trace: do_rename+0x502/0xd40 [ubifs] ubifs_rename+0x8b/0x180 [ubifs] vfs_rename+0x476/0x1080 do_renameat2+0x67c/0x7b0 __x64_sys_renameat2+0x6e/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x66/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Following race case can cause this: rename_whiteout(Thread 1) wb_workfn(Thread 2) ubifs_rename do_rename __writeback_single_inode spin_lock(&inode->i_lock) whiteout->i_state |= I_LINKABLE inode->i_state &= ~dirty; ---- How race happens on i_state: (tmp = whiteout->i_state | I_LINKABLE) (tmp = inode->i_state & ~dirty) (whiteout->i_state = tmp) (inode->i_state = tmp) ---- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock) inc_nlink(whiteout) WARN_ON(!(inode->i_state & I_LINKABLE)) !!! Fix to add i_lock to avoid i_state update race condition. Fixes: 9e0a1fff8db56ea ("ubifs: Implement RENAME_WHITEOUT") Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-07-20ubifs: journal: Fix error return code in ubifs_jnl_write_inode()Zhen Lei1-0/+1
[ Upstream commit a2c2a622d41168f9fea2aa3f76b9fbaa88531aac ] Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function. Fixes: 9ca2d7326444 ("ubifs: Limit number of xattrs per inode") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-07-20ubifs: Fix off-by-one errorSascha Hauer2-2/+2
[ Upstream commit d984bcf5766dbdbe95d325bb8a1b49a996fecfd4 ] An inode is allowed to have ubifs_xattr_max_cnt() xattrs, so we must complain only when an inode has more xattrs, having exactly ubifs_xattr_max_cnt() xattrs is fine. With this the maximum number of xattrs can be created without hitting the "has too many xattrs" warning when removing it. Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-07-19ubifs: Fix races between xattr_{set|get} and listxattr operationsZhihao Cheng3-11/+36
commit f4e3634a3b642225a530c292fdb1e8a4007507f5 upstream. UBIFS may occur some problems with concurrent xattr_{set|get} and listxattr operations, such as assertion failure, memory corruption, stale xattr value[1]. Fix it by importing a new rw-lock in @ubifs_inode to serilize write operations on xattr, concurrent read operations are still effective, just like ext4. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200630130438.141649-1-houtao1@huawei.com Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac05a23 ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v2.6+ Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-11ubifs: Only check replay with inode type to judge if inode linkedGuochun Mao1-1/+2
commit 3e903315790baf4a966436e7f32e9c97864570ac upstream. Conside the following case, it just write a big file into flash, when complete writing, delete the file, and then power off promptly. Next time power on, we'll get a replay list like: ... LEB 1105:211344 len 4144 deletion 0 sqnum 428783 key type 1 inode 80 LEB 15:233544 len 160 deletion 1 sqnum 428785 key type 0 inode 80 LEB 1105:215488 len 4144 deletion 0 sqnum 428787 key type 1 inode 80 ... In the replay list, data nodes' deletion are 0, and the inode node's deletion is 1. In current logic, the file's dentry will be removed, but inode and the flash space it occupied will be reserved. User will see that much free space been disappeared. We only need to check the deletion value of the following inode type node of the replay entry. Fixes: e58725d51fa8 ("ubifs: Handle re-linking of inodes correctly while recovery") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Guochun Mao <guochun.mao@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-03-04ubifs: Fix error return code in alloc_wbufs()Wang ShaoBo1-1/+3
[ Upstream commit 42119dbe571eb419dae99b81dd20fa42f47464e1 ] Fix to return PTR_ERR() error code from the error handling case instead fo 0 in function alloc_wbufs(), as done elsewhere in this function. Fixes: 6a98bc4614de ("ubifs: Add authentication nodes to journal") Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-03-04ubifs: replay: Fix high stack usage, againArnd Bergmann1-1/+3
[ Upstream commit 410b6de702ef84fea6e7abcb6620ef8bfc112fae ] An earlier commit moved out some functions to not be inlined by gcc, but after some other rework to remove one of those, clang started inlining the other one and ran into the same problem as gcc did before: fs/ubifs/replay.c:1174:5: error: stack frame size of 1152 bytes in function 'ubifs_replay_journal' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=] Mark the function as noinline_for_stack to ensure it doesn't happen again. Fixes: f80df3851246 ("ubifs: use crypto_shash_tfm_digest()") Fixes: eb66eff6636d ("ubifs: replay: Fix high stack usage") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-03-04ubifs: Fix memleak in ubifs_init_authenticationDinghao Liu1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit 11b8ab3836454a2600e396f34731e491b661f9d5 ] When crypto_shash_digestsize() fails, c->hmac_tfm has not been freed before returning, which leads to memleak. Fixes: 49525e5eecca5 ("ubifs: Add helper functions for authentication support") Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn> Reviewed-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-12-30ubifs: wbuf: Don't leak kernel memory to flashRichard Weinberger1-2/+11
commit 20f1431160c6b590cdc269a846fc5a448abf5b98 upstream. Write buffers use a kmalloc()'ed buffer, they can leak up to seven bytes of kernel memory to flash if writes are not aligned. So use ubifs_pad() to fill these gaps with padding bytes. This was never a problem while scanning because the scanner logic manually aligns node lengths and skips over these gaps. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac05a2 ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-30ubifs: Fix error return code in ubifs_init_authentication()Wang ShaoBo1-1/+3
[ Upstream commit 3cded66330591cfd2554a3fd5edca8859ea365a2 ] Fix to return PTR_ERR() error code from the error handling case where ubifs_hash_get_desc() failed instead of 0 in ubifs_init_authentication(), as done elsewhere in this function. Fixes: 49525e5eecca5 ("ubifs: Add helper functions for authentication support") Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-12-26ubifs: prevent creating duplicate encrypted filenamesEric Biggers1-4/+13
commit 76786a0f083473de31678bdb259a3d4167cf756d upstream. As described in "fscrypt: add fscrypt_is_nokey_name()", it's possible to create a duplicate filename in an encrypted directory by creating a file concurrently with adding the directory's encryption key. Fix this bug on ubifs by rejecting no-key dentries in ubifs_create(), ubifs_mkdir(), ubifs_mknod(), and ubifs_symlink(). Note that ubifs doesn't actually report the duplicate filenames from readdir, but rather it seems to replace the original dentry with a new one (which is still wrong, just a different effect from ext4). On ubifs, this fixes xfstest generic/595 as well as the new xfstest I wrote specifically for this bug. Fixes: f4f61d2cc6d8 ("ubifs: Implement encrypted filenames") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201118075609.120337-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-10-18Merge tag 'for-linus-5.10-rc1-part2' of ↵Linus Torvalds6-4/+12
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/ubifs Pull more ubi and ubifs updates from Richard Weinberger: "UBI: - Correctly use kthread_should_stop in ubi worker UBIFS: - Fixes for memory leaks while iterating directory entries - Fix for a user triggerable error message - Fix for a space accounting bug in authenticated mode" * tag 'for-linus-5.10-rc1-part2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/ubifs: ubifs: journal: Make sure to not dirty twice for auth nodes ubifs: setflags: Don't show error message when vfs_ioc_setflags_prepare() fails ubifs: ubifs_jnl_change_xattr: Remove assertion 'nlink > 0' for host inode ubi: check kthread_should_stop() after the setting of task state ubifs: dent: Fix some potential memory leaks while iterating entries ubifs: xattr: Fix some potential memory leaks while iterating entries
2020-10-18Merge tag 'for-linus-5.10-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds5-21/+34
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/ubifs Pull ubifs updates from Richard Weinberger: - Kernel-doc fixes - Fixes for memory leaks in authentication option parsing * tag 'for-linus-5.10-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/ubifs: ubifs: mount_ubifs: Release authentication resource in error handling path ubifs: Don't parse authentication mount options in remount process ubifs: Fix a memleak after dumping authentication mount options ubifs: Fix some kernel-doc warnings in tnc.c ubifs: Fix some kernel-doc warnings in replay.c ubifs: Fix some kernel-doc warnings in gc.c ubifs: Fix 'hash' kernel-doc warning in auth.c
2020-10-13Merge tag 'block-5.10-2020-10-12' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-blockLinus Torvalds1-0/+2
Pull block updates from Jens Axboe: - Series of merge handling cleanups (Baolin, Christoph) - Series of blk-throttle fixes and cleanups (Baolin) - Series cleaning up BDI, seperating the block device from the backing_dev_info (Christoph) - Removal of bdget() as a generic API (Christoph) - Removal of blkdev_get() as a generic API (Christoph) - Cleanup of is-partition checks (Christoph) - Series reworking disk revalidation (Christoph) - Series cleaning up bio flags (Christoph) - bio crypt fixes (Eric) - IO stats inflight tweak (Gabriel) - blk-mq tags fixes (Hannes) - Buffer invalidation fixes (Jan) - Allow soft limits for zone append (Johannes) - Shared tag set improvements (John, Kashyap) - Allow IOPRIO_CLASS_RT for CAP_SYS_NICE (Khazhismel) - DM no-wait support (Mike, Konstantin) - Request allocation improvements (Ming) - Allow md/dm/bcache to use IO stat helpers (Song) - Series improving blk-iocost (Tejun) - Various cleanups (Geert, Damien, Danny, Julia, Tetsuo, Tian, Wang, Xianting, Yang, Yufen, yangerkun) * tag 'block-5.10-2020-10-12' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block: (191 commits) block: fix uapi blkzoned.h comments blk-mq: move cancel of hctx->run_work to the front of blk_exit_queue blk-mq: get rid of the dead flush handle code path block: get rid of unnecessary local variable block: fix comment and add lockdep assert blk-mq: use helper function to test hw stopped block: use helper function to test queue register block: remove redundant mq check block: invoke blk_mq_exit_sched no matter whether have .exit_sched percpu_ref: don't refer to ref->data if it isn't allocated block: ratelimit handle_bad_sector() message blk-throttle: Re-use the throtl_set_slice_end() blk-throttle: Open code __throtl_de/enqueue_tg() blk-throttle: Move service tree validation out of the throtl_rb_first() blk-throttle: Move the list operation after list validation blk-throttle: Fix IO hang for a corner case blk-throttle: Avoid tracking latency if low limit is invalid blk-throttle: Avoid getting the current time if tg->last_finish_time is 0 blk-throttle: Remove a meaningless parameter for throtl_downgrade_state() block: Remove redundant 'return' statement ...
2020-10-11ubifs: mount_ubifs: Release authentication resource in error handling pathZhihao Cheng1-4/+6
Release the authentication related resource in some error handling branches in mount_ubifs(). Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.20+ Fixes: d8a22773a12c6d7 ("ubifs: Enable authentication support") Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-10-11ubifs: Don't parse authentication mount options in remount processZhihao Cheng1-6/+12
There is no need to dump authentication options while remounting, because authentication initialization can only be doing once in the first mount process. Dumping authentication mount options in remount process may cause memory leak if UBIFS has already been mounted with old authentication mount options. Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.20+ Fixes: d8a22773a12c6d7 ("ubifs: Enable authentication support") Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-10-11ubifs: Fix a memleak after dumping authentication mount optionsZhihao Cheng1-2/+14
Fix a memory leak after dumping authentication mount options in error handling branch. Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.20+ Fixes: d8a22773a12c6d7 ("ubifs: Enable authentication support") Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-09-29ubifs: journal: Make sure to not dirty twice for auth nodesRichard Weinberger1-2/+2
When removing the last reference of an inode the size of an auth node is already part of write_len. So we must not call ubifs_add_auth_dirt(). Call it only when needed. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kristof Havasi <havasiefr@gmail.com> Fixes: 6a98bc4614de ("ubifs: Add authentication nodes to journal") Reported-and-tested-by: Kristof Havasi <havasiefr@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-09-24bdi: initialize ->ra_pages and ->io_pages in bdi_initChristoph Hellwig1-0/+2
Set up a readahead size by default, as very few users have a good reason to change it. This means code, ecryptfs, and orangefs now set up the values while they were previously missing it, while ubifs, mtd and vboxsf manually set it to 0 to avoid readahead. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [btrfs] Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> [ubifs, mtd] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2020-09-22ubifs: use fscrypt_prepare_new_inode() and fscrypt_set_context()Eric Biggers1-22/+16
Convert ubifs to use the new functions fscrypt_prepare_new_inode() and fscrypt_set_context(). Unlike ext4 and f2fs, this doesn't appear to fix any deadlock bug. But it does shorten the code slightly and get all filesystems using the same helper functions, so that fscrypt_inherit_context() can be removed. It also fixes an incorrect error code where ubifs returned EPERM instead of the expected ENOKEY. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917041136.178600-6-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-09-18ubifs: Fix some kernel-doc warnings in tnc.cWang Hai1-2/+1
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): fs/ubifs/tnc.c:3479: warning: Excess function parameter 'inum' description in 'dbg_check_inode_size' fs/ubifs/tnc.c:366: warning: Excess function parameter 'node' description in 'lnc_free' @inum in 'dbg_check_inode_size' should be @inode, fix it. @node in 'lnc_free' is not in use, Remove it. Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-09-18ubifs: Fix some kernel-doc warnings in replay.cWang Hai1-2/+0
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): fs/ubifs/replay.c:942: warning: Excess function parameter 'ref_lnum' description in 'validate_ref' fs/ubifs/replay.c:942: warning: Excess function parameter 'ref_offs' description in 'validate_ref' They're not in use. Remove them. Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-09-18ubifs: Fix some kernel-doc warnings in gc.cWang Hai1-4/+0
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): fs/ubifs/gc.c:70: warning: Excess function parameter 'buf' description in 'switch_gc_head' fs/ubifs/gc.c:70: warning: Excess function parameter 'len' description in 'switch_gc_head' fs/ubifs/gc.c:70: warning: Excess function parameter 'lnum' description in 'switch_gc_head' fs/ubifs/gc.c:70: warning: Excess function parameter 'offs' description in 'switch_gc_head' They're not in use. Remove them. Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-09-18ubifs: Fix 'hash' kernel-doc warning in auth.cWang Hai1-1/+1
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): fs/ubifs/auth.c:66: warning: Excess function parameter 'hash' description in 'ubifs_prepare_auth_node' Rename hash to inhash. Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-09-17ubifs: setflags: Don't show error message when vfs_ioc_setflags_prepare() failsZhihao Cheng1-1/+0
Following process will trigger ubifs_err: 1. useradd -m freg (Under root) 2. cd /home/freg && mkdir mp (Under freg) 3. mount -t ubifs /dev/ubi0_0 /home/freg/mp (Under root) 4. cd /home/freg && echo 123 > mp/a (Under root) 5. cd mp && chown freg a && chgrp freg a && chmod 777 a (Under root) 6. chattr +i a (Under freg) UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 1723): ubifs_ioctl [ubifs]: can't modify inode 65 attributes chattr: Operation not permitted while setting flags on a This is not an UBIFS problem, it was caused by task priviliage checking on file operations. Remove error message printing from kernel just like other filesystems (eg. ext4), since we already have enough information from userspace tools. Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-09-17ubifs: ubifs_jnl_change_xattr: Remove assertion 'nlink > 0' for host inodeZhihao Cheng1-1/+0
Changing xattr of a temp file will trigger following assertion failed and make ubifs turn into readonly filesystem: ubifs_assert_failed [ubifs]: UBIFS assert failed: host->i_nlink > 0, in fs/ubifs/journal.c:1801 Reproducer: 1. fd = open(__O_TMPFILE) 2. fsetxattr(fd, key, value2, XATTR_CREATE) 3. fsetxattr(fd, key, value2, XATTR_REPLACE) Fix this by removing assertion 'nlink > 0' for host inode. Reported-by: Chengsong Ke <kechengsong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-09-17ubifs: dent: Fix some potential memory leaks while iterating entriesZhihao Cheng1-0/+1
Fix some potential memory leaks in error handling branches while iterating dent entries. For example, function dbg_check_dir() forgets to free pdent if it exists. Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac05a2 ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-09-17ubifs: xattr: Fix some potential memory leaks while iterating entriesZhihao Cheng4-0/+9
Fix some potential memory leaks in error handling branches while iterating xattr entries. For example, function ubifs_tnc_remove_ino() forgets to free pxent if it exists. Similar problems also exist in ubifs_purge_xattrs(), ubifs_add_orphan() and ubifs_jnl_write_inode(). Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac05a2 ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-09-08fscrypt: drop unused inode argument from fscrypt_fname_alloc_bufferJeff Layton1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200810142139.487631-1-jlayton@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.0) at 2024-09-02 19:10:22 +0300