Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
commit 4a5a5c73b7cfee (slightly better error reporting) added some
useless code in xt_rateest_mt_checkentry().
Fix this so that different error codes can really be returned.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
CC: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
|
|
In future, layer-3 matches will be an xt module of their own, and
need to set the fragoff and thoff fields. Adding more pointers would
needlessy increase memory requirements (esp. so for 64-bit, where
pointers are wider).
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
|
|
When extended status codes are available, such as ENOMEM on failed
allocations, or subsequent functions (e.g. nf_ct_get_l3proto), passing
them up to userspace seems like a good idea compared to just always
EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
|
|
The following semantic patch does part of the transformation:
// <smpl>
@ rule1 @
struct xt_match ops;
identifier check;
@@
ops.checkentry = check;
@@
identifier rule1.check;
@@
check(...) { <...
-return true;
+return 0;
...> }
@@
identifier rule1.check;
@@
check(...) { <...
-return false;
+return -EINVAL;
...> }
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
|
|
Restore function signatures from bool to int so that we can report
memory allocation failures or similar using -ENOMEM rather than
always having to pass -EINVAL back.
This semantic patch may not be too precise (checking for functions
that use xt_mtchk_param rather than functions referenced by
xt_match.checkentry), but reviewed, it produced the intended result.
// <smpl>
@@
type bool;
identifier check, par;
@@
-bool check
+int check
(struct xt_mtchk_param *par) { ... }
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
|
|
As noticed by Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com>:
Compiling the kernel with clang has shown this warning:
net/netfilter/xt_rateest.c:69:16: warning: self-comparison always results in a
constant value
ret &= pps2 == pps2;
^
Looking at the code:
if (info->flags & XT_RATEEST_MATCH_BPS)
ret &= bps1 == bps2;
if (info->flags & XT_RATEEST_MATCH_PPS)
ret &= pps2 == pps2;
Judging from the MATCH_BPS case it seems to be a typo, with the intention of
comparing pps1 with pps2.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13535
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
|
|
This patch does this for match extensions' destroy functions.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
|
|
This patch does this for match extensions' checkentry functions.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
|
|
The function signatures for Xtables extensions have grown over time.
It involves a lot of typing/replication, and also a bit of stack space
even if they are not used. Realize an NFWS2008 idea and pack them into
structs. The skb remains outside of the struct so gcc can continue to
apply its optimizations.
This patch does this for match extensions' match functions.
A few ambiguities have also been addressed. The "offset" parameter for
example has been renamed to "fragoff" (there are so many different
offsets already) and "protoff" to "thoff" (there is more than just one
protocol here, so clarify).
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
|
|
When a match or target is looked up using xt_find_{match,target},
Xtables will also search the NFPROTO_UNSPEC module list. This allows
for protocol-independent extensions (like xt_time) to be reused from
other components (e.g. arptables, ebtables).
Extensions that take different codepaths depending on match->family
or target->family of course cannot use NFPROTO_UNSPEC within the
registration structure (e.g. xt_pkttype).
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
|
|
Add rate estimator match. The rate estimator match can match on
estimated rates by the RATEEST target. It supports matching on
absolute bps/pps values, comparing two rate estimators and matching
on the difference between two rate estimators.
This is what I use to route outgoing data connections from a FTP
server over two lines based on the available bandwidth:
# estimate outgoing rates
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j RATEEST --rateest-name eth0 \
--rateest-interval 250ms \
--rateest-ewma 0.5s
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j RATEEST --rateest-name ppp0 \
--rateest-interval 250ms \
--rateest-ewma 0.5s
# mark based on available bandwidth
iptables -t mangle -A BALANCE -m state --state NEW \
-m helper --helper ftp \
-m rateest --rateest-delta \
--rateest1 eth0 \
--rateest-bps1 2.5mbit \
--rateest-gt \
--rateest2 ppp0 \
--rateest-bps2 2mbit \
-j CONNMARK --set-mark 0x1
iptables -t mangle -A BALANCE -m state --state NEW \
-m helper --helper ftp \
-m rateest --rateest-delta \
--rateest1 ppp0 \
--rateest-bps1 2mbit \
--rateest-gt \
--rateest2 eth0 \
--rateest-bps2 2.5mbit \
-j CONNMARK --set-mark 0x2
iptables -t mangle -A BALANCE -j CONNMARK --restore-mark
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|