summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-12-08Makefile.extrawarn: remove -Wnested-externs warningArnd Bergmann1-1/+0
The -Wnested-externs warning has become useless with gcc, since this warns every time that BUILD_BUG_ON() or similar macros are used. With clang, the warning option does nothing to start with, so just remove it entirely. Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
2020-11-24Makefile.extrawarn: move -Wcast-align to W=3Arnd Bergmann1-1/+1
This warning behaves differently depending on the architecture and compiler. Using x86 gcc, we get no output at all because gcc knows the architecture can handle unaligned accesses. Using x86 clang, or gcc on an architecture that needs to manually deal with unaligned accesses, the build log is completely flooded with these warnings, as they are commonly invoked by inline functions of networking headers, e.g. include/linux/skbuff.h:1426:26: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] The compiler is correct to point this out, as we are dealing with undefined behavior that does cause problems in practice, but there is also no good way to rewrite the code in commonly included headers to a safer method. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
2020-08-17Makefile.extrawarn: Move sign-compare from W=2 to W=3Joe Perches1-1/+1
This -Wsign-compare compiler warning can be very noisy and most of the suggested conversions are unnecessary. Make the warning W=3 so it's described under the "can most likely be ignored" block. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
2020-07-10kbuild: Move -Wtype-limits to W=2Rikard Falkeborn1-0/+2
-Wtype-limits is included in -Wextra which is added at W=1. It warns (among other things) that 'comparison of an unsigned variable `< 0` is always false. This causes noisy warnings, especially when used in macros, hence it is more suitable for W=2. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiKCXEWKJ9dWUimGbrVRo_N2RosESUw8E7m9AEtyZcu=w@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-08kbuild: Enable -Wtautological-compareNathan Chancellor1-0/+1
Currently, we disable -Wtautological-compare, which in turn disables a bunch of more specific tautological comparison warnings that are useful for the kernel such as -Wtautological-bitwise-compare. See clang's documentation below for the other warnings that are suppressed by -Wtautological-compare. Now that all of the major/noisy warnings have been fixed, enable -Wtautological-compare so that more issues can be caught at build time by various continuous integration setups. -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare is kept disabled under a normal build but visible at W=1 because there are places in the kernel where a constant or variable size can change based on the kernel configuration. These are not fixed in a clean/concise way and the ones I have audited so far appear to be harmless. It is not a subgroup but rather just one warning so we do not lose out on much coverage by default. Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/488 Link: http://releases.llvm.org/10.0.0/tools/clang/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#wtautological-compare Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42666 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
2020-03-14kbuild: Disable -Wpointer-to-enum-castNathan Chancellor1-0/+1
Clang's -Wpointer-to-int-cast deviates from GCC in that it warns when casting to enums. The kernel does this in certain places, such as device tree matches to set the version of the device being used, which allows the kernel to avoid using a gigantic union. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5.8/source/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c#L428 https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5.8/source/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c#L402 https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5.8/source/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h#L264 To avoid a ton of false positive warnings, disable this particular part of the warning, which has been split off into a separate diagnostic so that the entire warning does not need to be turned off for clang. It will be visible under W=1 in case people want to go about fixing these easily and enabling the warning treewide. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/887 Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2a41b31fcdfcb67ab7038fc2ffb606fd50b83a84 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
2019-09-09kbuild: allow Clang to find unused static inline functions for W=1 buildMasahiro Yamada1-0/+6
GCC and Clang have different policy for -Wunused-function; GCC does not warn unused static inline functions at all whereas Clang does if they are defined in source files instead of included headers although it has been suppressed since commit abb2ea7dfd82 ("compiler, clang: suppress warning for unused static inline functions"). We often miss to delete unused functions where 'static inline' is used in *.c files since there is no tool to detect them. Unused code remains until somebody notices. For example, commit 075ddd75680f ("regulator: core: remove unused rdev_get_supply()"). Let's remove __maybe_unused from the inline macro to allow Clang to start finding unused static inline functions. For now, we do this only for W=1 build since it is not a good idea to sprinkle warnings for the normal build (e.g. 35 warnings for arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig). My initial attempt was to add -Wno-unused-function for no W= build (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1120594/) Nathan Chancellor pointed out that would weaken Clang's checks since we would no longer get -Wunused-function without W=1. It is true GCC would catch unused static non-inline functions, but it would weaken Clang as a standalone compiler, at least. Hence, here is a counter implementation. The current problem is, W=... only controls compiler flags, which are globally effective. There is no way to address only 'static inline' functions. This commit defines KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN[123] corresponding to W=[123]. When KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN1 is defined, __maybe_unused is omitted from the 'inline' macro. The new macro __inline_maybe_unused makes the code a bit uglier, so I hope we can remove it entirely after fixing most of the warnings. If you contribute to code clean-up, please run "make CC=clang W=1" and check -Wunused-function warnings. You will find lots of unused functions. Some of them are false-positives because the call-sites are disabled by #ifdef. I do not like to abuse the inline keyword for suppressing unused-function warnings because it is intended to be a hint for the compiler optimization. I prefer #ifdef around the definition, or __maybe_unused if #ifdef would make the code too ugly. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
2019-09-06kbuild: rename KBUILD_ENABLE_EXTRA_GCC_CHECKS to KBUILD_EXTRA_WARNMasahiro Yamada1-4/+9
KBUILD_ENABLE_EXTRA_GCC_CHECKS started as a switch to add extra warning options for GCC, but now it is a historical misnomer since we use it also for Clang, DTC, and even kernel-doc. Rename it to more sensible, shorter KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN. For the backward compatibility, KBUILD_ENABLE_EXTRA_GCC_CHECKS is still supported (but not advertised in the documentation). I also fixed up 'make help', and updated the documentation. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
2019-09-06kbuild: refactor scripts/Makefile.extrawarnMasahiro Yamada1-50/+56
Instead of the warning-[123] magic, let's accumulate compiler options to KBUILD_CFLAGS directly as the top Makefile does. I think this makes it easier to understand what is going on in this file. This commit slightly changes the behavior, I think all of which are OK. [1] Currently, cc-option calls are needlessly evaluated. For example, warning-3 += $(call cc-option, -Wpacked-bitfield-compat) needs evaluating only when W=3, but it is actually evaluated for W=1, W=2 as well. With this commit, only relevant cc-option calls will be evaluated. This is a slight optimization. [2] Currently, unsupported level like W=4 is checked by: $(error W=$(KBUILD_ENABLE_EXTRA_GCC_CHECKS) is unknown) This will no longer be checked, but I do not think it is a big deal. [3] Currently, 4 Clang warnings (Winitializer-overrides, Wformat, Wsign-compare, Wformat-zero-length) are shown by any of W=1, W=2, and W=3. With this commit, they will be warned only by W=1. I think this is a more correct behavior since each warning belongs to only one group. For understanding this commit correctly: We have 3 warning groups, W=1, W=2, and W=3. You may think W=3 has a higher level than W=1, but they are actually independent. If you like, you can combine them like W=13. To enable all the warnings, you can pass W=123. It is shown by 'make help', but not noticed much. Since we support W= combination, there should not exist intersection among the three groups. If we enable Winitializer-overrides for W=1, we do not need to for W=2 or W=3. This is the reason why I think the change [3] makes sense. The documentation says -Winitializer-overrides is enabled by default. (https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#winitializer-overrides) We negate it by passing -Wno-initializer-overrides for the normal build, but we do not do that for W=1. This means, W=1 effectively enables -Winitializer-overrides by the clang's default. The same for the other three. Add comments in case people are confused with the code. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
2019-06-23kbuild: Remove unnecessary -Wno-unused-valueNathan Huckleberry1-1/+0
This flag turns off several other warnings that would be useful. Most notably -warn_unused_result is disabled. All of the following warnings are currently disabled: UnusedValue |-UnusedComparison |-warn_unused_comparison |-UnusedResult |-warn_unused_result |-UnevaluatedExpression |-PotentiallyEvaluatedExpression |-warn_side_effects_typeid |-warn_side_effects_unevaluated_context |-warn_unused_expr |-warn_unused_voidptr |-warn_unused_container_subscript_expr |-warn_unused_call With this flag removed there are ~10 warnings. Patches have been submitted for each of these warnings. Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/520 Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-06-23kbuild: Enable -WuninitializedNathan Chancellor1-1/+0
This helps fine very dodgy behavior through both -Wuninitialized (warning that a variable is always uninitialized) and -Wsometimes-uninitialized (warning that a variable is sometimes uninitialized, like GCC's -Wmaybe-uninitialized). These warnings catch things that GCC doesn't such as: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/86649ee4-9794-77a3-502c-f4cd10019c36@lca.pw/ We very much want to catch these so turn this warning on so that CI is aware of it. Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/381 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-06-09kbuild: Remove -Waggregate-return from scripts/Makefile.extrawarnMathieu Malaterre1-1/+0
It makes little sense to pass -Waggregate-return these days since large part of the linux kernel rely on returning struct(s). For instance: ../include/linux/timekeeping.h: In function 'show_uptime': ../include/linux/ktime.h:91:34: error: function call has aggregate value [-Werror=aggregate-return] #define ktime_to_timespec64(kt) ns_to_timespec64((kt)) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../include/linux/timekeeping.h:166:8: note: in expansion of macro 'ktime_to_timespec64' *ts = ktime_to_timespec64(ktime_get_coarse_boottime()); Remove this warning from W=2 completely. Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-05-18kbuild: add all Clang-specific flags unconditionallyMasahiro Yamada1-6/+6
We do not support old Clang versions. Upgrade your clang version if any of these flags is unsupported. Let's add all flags inside ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG unconditionally. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
2019-05-18kbuild: add some extra warning flags unconditionallyMasahiro Yamada1-6/+7
These flags are documented in the GCC 4.6 manual, and recognized by Clang as well. Let's rip off the cc-option / cc-disable-warning switches. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
2018-11-03Merge tag 'kbuild-v4.20-2' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild Pull Kbuild updates from Masahiro Yamada: - clean-up leftovers in Kconfig files - remove stale oldnoconfig and silentoldconfig targets - remove unneeded cc-fullversion and cc-name variables - improve merge_config script to allow overriding option prefix * tag 'kbuild-v4.20-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild: kbuild: remove cc-name variable kbuild: replace cc-name test with CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG merge_config.sh: Allow to define config prefix kbuild: remove unused cc-fullversion variable kconfig: remove silentoldconfig target kconfig: remove oldnoconfig target powerpc: PCI_MSI needs PCI powerpc: remove CONFIG_MCA leftovers powerpc: remove CONFIG_PCI_QSPAN scsi: aha152x: rename the PCMCIA define
2018-11-02kbuild: replace cc-name test with CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANGMasahiro Yamada1-1/+1
Evaluating cc-name invokes the compiler every time even when you are not compiling anything, like 'make help'. This is not efficient. The compiler type has been already detected in the Kconfig stage. Use CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG, instead. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc) Acked-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> (MIPS) Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
2018-11-02Merge tag 'compiler-attributes-for-linus-4.20-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-0/+1
https://github.com/ojeda/linux Pull compiler attribute updates from Miguel Ojeda: "This is an effort to disentangle the include/linux/compiler*.h headers and bring them up to date. The main idea behind the series is to use feature checking macros (i.e. __has_attribute) instead of compiler version checks (e.g. GCC_VERSION), which are compiler-agnostic (so they can be shared, reducing the size of compiler-specific headers) and version-agnostic. Other related improvements have been performed in the headers as well, which on top of the use of __has_attribute it has amounted to a significant simplification of these headers (e.g. GCC_VERSION is now only guarding a few non-attribute macros). This series should also help the efforts to support compiling the kernel with clang and icc. A fair amount of documentation and comments have also been added, clarified or removed; and the headers are now more readable, which should help kernel developers in general. The series was triggered due to the move to gcc >= 4.6. In turn, this series has also triggered Sparse to gain the ability to recognize __has_attribute on its own. Finally, the __nonstring variable attribute series has been also applied on top; plus two related patches from Nick Desaulniers for unreachable() that came a bit afterwards" * tag 'compiler-attributes-for-linus-4.20-rc1' of https://github.com/ojeda/linux: compiler-gcc: remove comment about gcc 4.5 from unreachable() compiler.h: update definition of unreachable() Compiler Attributes: ext4: remove local __nonstring definition Compiler Attributes: auxdisplay: panel: use __nonstring Compiler Attributes: enable -Wstringop-truncation on W=1 (gcc >= 8) Compiler Attributes: add support for __nonstring (gcc >= 8) Compiler Attributes: add MAINTAINERS entry Compiler Attributes: add Doc/process/programming-language.rst Compiler Attributes: remove uses of __attribute__ from compiler.h Compiler Attributes: KENTRY used twice the "used" attribute Compiler Attributes: use feature checks instead of version checks Compiler Attributes: add missing SPDX ID in compiler_types.h Compiler Attributes: remove unneeded sparse (__CHECKER__) tests Compiler Attributes: homogenize __must_be_array Compiler Attributes: remove unneeded tests Compiler Attributes: always use the extra-underscores syntax Compiler Attributes: remove unused attributes
2018-10-11Makefile: Globally enable VLA warningKees Cook1-1/+0
Now that Variable Length Arrays (VLAs) have been entirely removed[1] from the kernel, enable the VLA warning globally. The only exceptions to this are the KASan an UBSan tests which are explicitly checking that VLAs trigger their respective tests. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2018-09-30Compiler Attributes: enable -Wstringop-truncation on W=1 (gcc >= 8)Miguel Ojeda1-0/+1
Commit 217c3e019675 ("disable stringop truncation warnings for now") disabled -Wstringop-truncation since it was too noisy. Having __nonstring available allows us to let GCC know that a string is not meant to be NUL-terminated, which helps suppressing some -Wstringop-truncation warnings. Note that using __nonstring actually triggers other warnings (-Wstringop-overflow, which is on by default) which may be real problems. Therefore, cleaning up -Wstringop-truncation warnings also buys us the ability to uncover further potential problems. To encourage the use of __nonstring, we put the warning back at W=1. In the future, if we end up with a fairly warning-free tree, we might want to enable it by default. Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> # on top of v4.19-rc5, clang 7 Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
2018-01-18Kbuild: suppress packed-not-aligned warning for default setting onlyXiongfeng Wang1-0/+3
gcc-8 reports many -Wpacked-not-aligned warnings. The below are some examples. ./include/linux/ceph/msgr.h:67:1: warning: alignment 1 of 'struct ceph_entity_addr' is less than 8 [-Wpacked-not-aligned] } __attribute__ ((packed)); ./include/linux/ceph/msgr.h:67:1: warning: alignment 1 of 'struct ceph_entity_addr' is less than 8 [-Wpacked-not-aligned] } __attribute__ ((packed)); ./include/linux/ceph/msgr.h:67:1: warning: alignment 1 of 'struct ceph_entity_addr' is less than 8 [-Wpacked-not-aligned] } __attribute__ ((packed)); This patch suppresses this kind of warnings for default setting. Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <xiongfeng.wang@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-11-02License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no licenseGreg Kroah-Hartman1-0/+1
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-09-01Kbuild: enable -Wunused-macros warning for "make W=2"Johannes Thumshirn1-0/+1
We have lots of dead defines and macros in drivers, lets offer users a way to detect and eventually remove them. Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-04-23kbuild: drop -Wno-unknown-warning-option from clang optionsMasahiro Yamada1-1/+0
Since commit c3f0d0bc5b01 ("kbuild, LLVMLinux: Add -Werror to cc-option to support clang"), cc-option and friends work nicely for clang. However, -Wno-unknown-warning-option makes clang happy with any unknown warning options even if -Werror is specified. Once -Wno-unknown-warning-option is added, any succeeding call of cc-disable-warning is evaluated positive, then unknown warning options are accepted. This should be dropped. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2016-11-11Kbuild: enable -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings by defaultArnd Bergmann1-2/+0
Previously the warnings were added back at the W=1 level and above, this now turns them on again by default, assuming that we have addressed all warnings and again have a clean build for v4.10. I found a number of new warnings in linux-next already and submitted bugfixes for those. Hopefully they are caught by the 0day builder in the future as soon as this patch is merged. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-11-11Kbuild: enable -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning for "make W=1"Arnd Bergmann1-0/+3
Traditionally, we have always had warnings about uninitialized variables enabled, as this is part of -Wall, and generally a good idea [1], but it also always produced false positives, mainly because this is a variation of the halting problem and provably impossible to get right in all cases [2]. Various people have identified cases that are particularly bad for false positives, and in commit e74fc973b6e5 ("Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized when building with -Os"), I turned off the warning for any build that was done with CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE. This drastically reduced the number of false positive warnings in the default build but unfortunately had the side effect of turning the warning off completely in 'allmodconfig' builds, which in turn led to a lot of warnings (both actual bugs, and remaining false positives) to go in unnoticed. With commit 877417e6ffb9 ("Kbuild: change CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE definition") enabled the warning again for allmodconfig builds in v4.7 and in v4.8-rc1, I had finally managed to address all warnings I get in an ARM allmodconfig build and most other maybe-uninitialized warnings for ARM randconfig builds. However, commit 6e8d666e9253 ("Disable "maybe-uninitialized" warning globally") was merged at the same time and disabled it completely for all configurations, because of false-positive warnings on x86 that I had not addressed until then. This caused a lot of actual bugs to get merged into mainline, and I sent several dozen patches for these during the v4.9 development cycle. Most of these are actual bugs, some are for correct code that is safe because it is only called under external constraints that make it impossible to run into the case that gcc sees, and in a few cases gcc is just stupid and finds something that can obviously never happen. I have now done a few thousand randconfig builds on x86 and collected all patches that I needed to address every single warning I got (I can provide the combined patch for the other warnings if anyone is interested), so I hope we can get the warning back and let people catch the actual bugs earlier. This reverts the change to disable the warning completely and for now brings it back at the "make W=1" level, so we can get it merged into mainline without introducing false positives. A follow-up patch enables it on all levels unless some configuration option turns it off because of false-positives. Link: https://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=232 [1] Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Uninitialized_Warnings [2] Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-11kbuild: move -Wunused-const-variable to W=1 warning levelArnd Bergmann1-0/+1
gcc-6 started warning by default about variables that are not used anywhere and that are marked 'const', generating many false positives in an allmodconfig build, e.g.: arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c:282:20: warning: 'da830_evm_emif25_pins' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c:958:34: warning: 'omap_timer_match' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c:625:39: warning: 'acpi_bcm_default_gpios' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] drivers/char/hw_random/omap-rng.c:92:18: warning: 'reg_map_omap4' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos5_bus.c:381:32: warning: 'exynos5_busfreq_int_pm' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] drivers/dma/mv_xor.c:1139:34: warning: 'mv_xor_dt_ids' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] This is similar to the existing -Wunused-but-set-variable warning that was added in an earlier release and that we disable by default now and only enable when W=1 is set, so it makes sense to do the same here. Once we have eliminated the majority of the warnings for both, we can put them back into the default list. We probably want this in backport kernels as well, to allow building them with gcc-6 without introducing extra warnings. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
2016-01-12kbuild: Demote 'sign-compare' warning to W=2Lee Jones1-0/+2
Ideally, a kernel compile with W=1 enabled should complete cleanly; however, when we run one currently we are presented with ~25k warnings. 'sign-compare' accounts for ~22k of those ~25k. In this patch we're demoting 'sign-compare' warnings to W=2, with a view to fixing the remaining 3k W=1 warnings required for a clean build. Arnd adds: "As per our discussion, I'd add that this was inadvertedly introduced by Behan when he moved the clang specific warnings into an ifdef block and did not notice that -Wsign-compare was interpreted by both gcc and clang. Earlier, it was introduced in just the same way by Jan-Simon as part of 3d3d6b847420 ("kbuild: LLVMLinux: Adapt warnings for compilation with clang")." Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: 26ea6bb1fef0 ("kbuild, LLVMLinux: Supress warnings unless W=1-3") Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
2015-09-04kbuild: Fix clang detectionMichal Marek1-1/+1
We cannot detect clang before including the arch Makefile, because that can set the default cross compiler. We also cannot detect clang after including the arch Makefile, because powerpc wants to know about clang. Solve this by using an deferred variable. This costs us a few shell invocations, but this is only a constant number. Reported-by: Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com> Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
2014-08-05kbuild, LLVMLinux: Supress warnings unless W=1-3Behan Webster1-10/+11
clang has more warnings enabled by default. Turn them off unless W is set. This patch fixes a logic bug where warnings in clang were disabled when W was set. Signed-off-by: Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com> Signed-off-by: Jan-Simon Möller <dl9pf@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Mark Charlebois <charlebm@gmail.com> Cc: bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
2014-04-17kbuild: move extra gcc checks to scripts/Makefile.extrawarnMasahiro Yamada1-0/+67
W=... provides extra gcc checks. Having such code in scripts/Makefile.build results in the same flags being added to KBUILD_CFLAGS multiple times becuase scripts/Makefile.build is invoked every time Kbuild descends into the subdirectories. Since the top Makefile is already too cluttered, this commit moves all of extra gcc check stuff to a new file scripts/Makefile.extrawarn, which is included from the top Makefile. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>