| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Use the KBUILD_IMAGE variable to determine the right kernel image to
install and install compressed images to /boot/vmlinuz-$version like the
'make install' target already does.
Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
Given KBUILD_IMAGE properly set in arch/*/Makefile, the default case
should work in most scenarios. The only oddity is the naming of the
copy destination, vmlinux-kbuild-${KERNELRELEASE}. Let's rename it
to vmlinuz-${KERNELRELEASE} because the kernel is often compressed.
Remove the warning to avoid unnecessary patch submissions when the
default case suffices.
Remove the x86 case, which is now equivalent to the default.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
|
|
scripts/package/buildtar checks some kernel packages, and copies the
first image found. This may potentially produce an inconsistent (and
possibly wrong) package.
For instance, the for-loop for arm64 checks Image.{bz2,gz,lz4,lzma,lzo},
and vmlinuz.efi, then copies the first image found, which might be a
stale image created in a previous build.
When CONFIG_EFI_ZBOOT is enabled in the pristine source tree,
'make ARCH=arm64 tar-pkg' will build and copy vmlinuz.efi. This is the
expected behavior.
If you build the kernel with CONFIG_EFI_ZBOOT disabled, Image.gz will
be created, which will remain in the tree until you run 'make clean'.
Even if CONFIG_EFI_ZBOOT is turned on later, 'make ARCH=arm64 tar-pkg'
will copy stale Image.gz instead of the latest vmlinuz.efi, as Image.gz
takes precedence over vmlinuz.efi.
In summary, the code "[ -f ... ] && cp" does not consistently produce
the desired outcome.
Other packaging targets are deterministic; deb-pkg and rpm-pkg copies
${KBUILD_IMAGE}, which is determined by CONFIG options.
I removed [ -f ... ] checks from x86, alpha, parisc, and the default
because they have a single kernel image to copy. If it is missing, it
should be an error.
I did not modify the code for mips, arm64, riscv. Instead, I left some
comments. Eventually, someone may fix the code, or at the very least,
it may discourage the copy-pasting of incorrect code to another
architecture.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
|
|
Some architectures, like aarch64 ones, need a dtb file to configure the
hardware. The default dtb file can be preloaded from u-boot, but the final
and/or more complete dtb file needs to be able to be loaded later from
rootfs.
Add the possible dtb files to the kernel rpm and mimic Fedora shipping
process, storing the dtb files in the module directory. These dtb files
will be copied to /boot directory by the install scripts, but add fallback
just in case, checking if the content in /boot directory is correct.
Mark the files installed to /boot as %ghost to make sure they will be
removed when the package is uninstalled.
Tested with Fedora Rawhide (x86_64 and aarch64) with dnf and rpm tools.
In addition, fallback was also tested after modifying the install scripts.
Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
This reverts commit 6ef41e22a320d95a246d45b673aa7247cc1bbf7b.
If this is still needed, we can bring it back.
However, I'd like to understand why 'new-kernel-pkg --remove' is
needed for uninstallation, while 'new-kernel-pkg --install' was not
called during the installation.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
This reverts commit 27c3bffd230abd0a598586aed0fe0ba7b61e0e2e.
If this is still needed, we can bring it back.
However, I'd like to understand why 'update-bootloader --remove' is
needed for uninstallation, while 'update-bootloader --add' was not
called during the installation.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
Mark the files installed to /boot as %ghost to make sure they will be
removed when the package is uninstalled.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
|
|
Installing the kernel package is fine, but when uninstalling it, the
following warnings are shown:
warning: file modules.symbols.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
warning: file modules.symbols: remove failed: No such file or directory
warning: file modules.softdep: remove failed: No such file or directory
warning: file modules.devname: remove failed: No such file or directory
warning: file modules.dep.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
warning: file modules.dep: remove failed: No such file or directory
warning: file modules.builtin.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
warning: file modules.builtin.alias.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
warning: file modules.alias.bin: remove failed: No such file or directory
warning: file modules.alias: remove failed: No such file or directory
The %preun scriptlet runs 'kernel-install remove', which in turn invokes
/usr/lib/kernel/install.d/50-depmod.install to remove those files before
the actual package removal.
RPM-based distributions do not ship files generated by depmod. Mark them
as %ghost in order to exclude them from the package, but still claim the
ownership on them.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
|
|
Use dh_prep instead of removing old build directories manually.
Use dh_clean instead of removing build directories and debian/files
manually.
Call dh_testdir and dh_testroot for preliminary checks.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
'make deb-pkg' builds build-arch in parallel, but binary-arch serially.
Given that all binary packages are independent of one another, they can
be built in parallel.
I am uncertain whether debian/files is robust against a race condition.
Just in case, make dh_gencontrol (dpkg-gencontrol) output to separate
debian/*.files, which are then concatenated into debian/files.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
Add $(Q) to the commands in debian/rules to make them quiet when the
package built is initiated by 'make deb-pkg' or when the 'terse' tag
is set to DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
When the Debian package build is initiated by Kbuild ('make deb-pkg'
or 'make bindeb-pkg'), the log messages are displayed in the short
form, which is the Kbuild default.
Otherwise, let's show verbose messages (unless the 'terse' tag is set
in DEB_BUILD_OPTION), as suggested by Debian Policy: "The package build
should be as verbose as reasonably possible, except where the terse tag
is included in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS." [1]
This is what the Debian kernel also does. [2]
[1]: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules
[2]: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/blob/debian/6.7-1_exp1/debian/rules.real#L36
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
The new installkernel application that is now included in systemd-udev
package allows installation although destination files are already present
in the boot directory of the kernel package, but is failing with the
implemented workaround for the old installkernel application from grubby
package.
For the new installkernel application, as Davide says:
<<The %post currently does a shuffling dance before calling installkernel.
This isn't actually necessary afaict, and the current implementation
ends up triggering downstream issues such as
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/29568
This commit simplifies the logic to remove the shuffling. For reference,
the original logic was added in commit 3c9c7a14b627("rpm-pkg: add %post
section to create initramfs and grub hooks").>>
But we need to keep the old behavior as well, because the old installkernel
application from grubby package, does not allow this simplification and
we need to be backward compatible to avoid issues with the different
packages.
Mimic Fedora shipping process and store vmlinuz, config amd System.map
in the module directory instead of the boot directory. In this way, we will
avoid the commented problem for all the cases, because the new destination
files are not going to exist in the boot directory of the kernel package.
Replace installkernel tool with kernel-install tool, because the latter is
more complete.
Besides, after installkernel tool execution, check to complete if the
correct package files vmlinuz, System.map and config files are present
in /boot directory, and if necessary, copy manually for install operation.
In this way, take into account if files were not previously copied from
/usr/lib/kernel/install.d/* scripts and if the suitable files for the
requested package are present (it could be others if the rpm files were
replace with a new pacakge with the same release and a different build).
Tested with Fedora 38, Fedora 39, RHEL 9, Oracle Linux 9.3,
openSUSE Tumbleweed and openMandrive ROME, using dnf/zypper and rpm tools.
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Co-Developed-by: Davide Cavalca <dcavalca@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
Use debian/<package> for tmpdir, which is the default of debhelper.
This simplifies the code.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
Strictly speaking, 'make headers' should be a part of build-arch
instead of binary-arch.
'make headers' constructs ready-to-copy UAPI headers in the kernel
directory.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
The 'scripts' directory was searched under arch/${SRCARCH} to copy
arch/ia64/scripts, but commit cf8e8658100d ("arch: Remove Itanium
(IA-64) architecture") removed arch/ia64/ entirely.
There is another 'scripts' directory in arch/um/, but this script
is never executed with SRCARCH=um because UML does not support the
linux-headers package.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
There are two ways of managing separate debug info files:
[1] The executable contains the .gnu_debuglink section, which specifies
the name and the CRC of the separate debug info file.
[2] The executable contains a build ID, and the corresponding debug info
file is placed in the .build-id directory.
We could do both, but the former, which 'make deb-pkg' currently does,
results in complicated installation steps because we need to manually
strip the debug sections, create debug links, and re-sign the modules.
Besides, it is not working with module compression.
This commit abandons the approach [1], and instead opts for [2].
Debian kernel commit de26137e2a9f ("Drop not needed extra step to add
debug links") also stopped adding debug links.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
Commit 36862e14e316 ("kbuild: deb-pkg: use dh_listpackages to know
enabled packages") started to require the debhelper tool suite.
Use more dh_* commands in create_package():
- dh_installdocs to install copyright
- dh_installchangelogs to install changelog
- dh_compress to compress changelog
- dh_fixperms to replace the raw chmod command
- dh_gencontrol to replace the raw dpkg-gencontrol command
- dh_md5sums to record the md5sum of included files
- dh_builddeb to replace the raw dpkg-deb command
Set DEB_RULES_REQUIRES_ROOT to 'no' in case debian/rules is executed
directly.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
This is unneeded because the Makefile in the output directory wraps
the top-level Makefile in the srctree.
Just run $(MAKE) irrespective of the build location.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
'make O=... deb-pkg' creates the debian directory in the output
directory. However, currently it is impossible to run debian/rules
created in the separate output directory.
This commit delays the $(srctree) expansion by escaping '$' and by
quoting the entire command, making it possible to run debian/rules in
the output directory.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
Since commit 491b146d4c13 ("kbuild: builddeb: Eliminate debian/arch
use"), direct execution of debian/rules results in the following error:
dpkg-architecture: error: unknown option 'DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH'
The current code:
dpkg-architecture -a$DEB_HOST_ARCH -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH
... does not look sensible because:
- For this code to work correctly, DEB_HOST_ARCH must be pre-defined,
which is true when the packages are built via dpkg-buildpackage.
In this case, DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH is also likely defined, hence there
is no need to query DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH in the first place.
- If DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH is undefined, DEB_HOST_ARCH is likely undefined
too. So, you cannot query DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH in this way. This is
mostly the case where debian/rules is directly executed.
When debian/rules is directly executed, querying DEB_HOST_MUCHARCH is
not enough because we need to know DEB_{BUILD,HOST}_GNU_TYPE as well.
All DEB_* variables are defined when the package build is initiated by
dpkg-buildpackage, but otherwise, let's call dpkg-architecture to set
all DEB_* environment variables.
This requires dpkg 1.20.6 or newer because --print-format option
was added in dpkg commit 7c54fa2b232e ("dpkg-architecture: Add a
--print-format option").
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
The binary-arch target needs to use the same CROSS_COMPILE as used in
build-arch; otherwise, 'make run-command' may attempt to resync the
.config file.
Squash scripts/package/deb-build-option into debian/rules, as it is a
small amount of code.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
This avoids code duplication between binary-arch and built-arch.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
The condition to require libelf-dev:native is stale because objtool is
now enabled by CONFIG_OBJTOOL instead of CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC. Not only
objtool but also resolve_btfids requires libelf-dev:native; therefore,
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF should be checked as well.
Similarly, CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING is not the only case that
requires libssl-dev:native.
Perhaps, the following code would provide better coverage, but it is
hard to maintain (and may still be imperfect).
if is_enabled CONFIG_OBJTOOL ||
is_enabled CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF; then
build_depends="${build_depends}, libelf-dev:native"
fi
if is_enabled CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING ||
is_enabled CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST ||
is_enabled CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT; then
build_depends="${build_depends}, libssl-dev:native"
fi
Let's hard-code the build dependency.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
Copy debian/copyright instead of generating it by the 'cat' command.
I also updated '2018' to '2023' while I was here.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
In 2017, the dpkg suite introduced the rootless builds support with the
following commits:
- 2436807c87b0 ("dpkg-deb: Add support for rootless builds")
- fca1bfe84068 ("dpkg-buildpackage: Add support for rootless builds")
This feature is available in the default dpkg on Debian 10 and Ubuntu
20.04.
Remove the old method.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
A little more janitorial work after commit cf8e8658100d ("arch: Remove
Itanium (IA-64) architecture").
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
|
|
The rpm-pkg and deb-pkg targets have transitioned to using 'git archive'
for tarball creation.
Although the old cmd_src_tar is still used by snap-pkg, there is no need
to pack and unpack a tarball solely for passing the source to snapcraft.
Instead, you can use 'source-type: local' to tell the source location to
snapcraft.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
It is done for the same reasons as 4243afdb9326 does it for builddeb:
always runs make modules to install modules.builtin* files, which are
needed for e.g. initramfs-tools or LTP testing tool.
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
The shell variable $dirs is not used any more since 1fc9095846cc
("kbuild: tar-pkg: use tar rules in scripts/Makefile.package"),
therefore remove it".
Fixes: 1fc9095846cc ("kbuild: tar-pkg: use tar rules in scripts/Makefile.package")
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
kernel.spec is the last piece that resides outside the rpmbuild/
directory. Move all the RPM-related files to rpmbuild/ consistently.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
|
|
Since commit d8131c2965d5 ("kbuild: remove $(MODLIB)/source symlink"),
modules_install does not create the 'source' symlink.
Remove the stale code from builddeb and kernel.spec.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
Since commit fe66b5d2ae72 ("kbuild: refactor kernel-devel RPM package
and linux-headers Deb package"), the kernel-devel RPM package and
linux-headers Deb package are broken.
I double-quoted the $(find ... -type d), which resulted in newlines
being included in the argument to the outer find comment.
find: 'arch/arm64/include\narch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include': No such file or directory
The outer find command is unneeded.
Fixes: fe66b5d2ae72 ("kbuild: refactor kernel-devel RPM package and linux-headers Deb package")
Reported-by: Karolis M <k4rolis@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>
|
|
'make srcdeb-pkg' generates a source package, which you can build
later by using dpkg-buildpackage.
In older dpkg versions, 'dpkg-buildpackage --jobs=N' sets not only
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS but also MAKEFLAGS. Hence, passing -j or --jobs
to dpkg-buildpackage was enough for kicking the parallel execution.
The behavior was changed by commit 1d0ea9b2ba3f ("dpkg-buildpackage:
Change -j, --jobs semantics to non-force mode") of dpkg project. [1]
Since then, 'dpkg-buildpackage --jobs=N' sets only DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS,
which is not parsed by the current debian/rules. To build the package
in parallel, you need to pass the alternative --jobs-force option or
set the MAKEFLAGS environment variable.
Debian policy [2] suggests the following code snippet for debian/rules.
ifneq (,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
NUMJOBS = $(patsubst parallel=%,%,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
MAKEFLAGS += -j$(NUMJOBS)
endif
I tweaked the code to filter out parallel=1 and passed --jobs=1 to
dpkg-buildpackage from scripts/Makefile.package. It is needed to force
'make deb-pkg' without the -j option to run in serial. Please note that
dpkg-buildpackage sets parallel=<nproc> in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS by default
(that is, --jobs=auto is the default) and --jobs=1 is needed to restore
the serial execution. When dpkg-buildpackage is invoked from Kbuild,
the number of jobs is inherited from the top level Makefile. Passing
--jobs=1 to dpkg-buildpackage allows debian/rules to skip parsing
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/dpkg-team/dpkg/-/commit/1d0ea9b2ba3f6a2de5b1a6ff55f3df7b71f73db6
[2] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules-options
Reported-by: Bastian Germann <bage@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
debian/rules is generated by shell, but the escape sequence (\$) is
unreadable.
debian/rules embeds only two variables (ARCH and KERNELRELEASE).
Split them out to debian/rules.vars, and check-in the rest of Makefile
code to scripts/package/debian/rules.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
|
|
Debian Policy "4.9. Main building script: debian/rules" requires
"debian/rules must start with the line #!/usr/bin/make -f". [1]
Currently, Kbuild does not follow this policy.
When Kbuild generates debian/rules, "#!$(command -v $MAKE) -f" is
expanded by shell. The resuling string may not be "#!/usr/bin/make -f".
There was a reason to opt out the Debian policy.
If you run '/path/to/my/custom/make deb-pkg', debian/rules must also be
invoked by the same Make program. If #!/usr/bin/make were hard-coded in
debian/rules, the sub-make would be executed by a possibly different
Make version.
This is problematic due to the MAKEFLAGS incompatibility, especially the
job server flag. Old Make versions used --jobserver-fds to propagate job
server file descriptors, but Make >= 4.2 uses --jobserver-auth. The flag
disagreement between the parent/child Makes would result in a process
fork explosion.
However, having a non-standard path in the shebang causes another issue;
the generated source package is not portable as such a path does not
exist in other build environments.
This commit solves those conflicting demands.
Hard-code '#!/usr/bin/make -f' in debian/rules to create a portable and
Debian-compliant source package.
Pass '--rules-file=$(MAKE) -f debian/rules' when dpkg-buildpackage is
invoked from Makefile so that debian/rules is executed by the same Make
program as used to start Kbuild.
[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
|
|
Merge the similar build targets.
Also, make the output location consistent.
Previously, source packages were created in the build directory,
while binary packages under ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/.
Now, Kbuild creates the rpmbuild/ directory in the build directory,
and saves all packages under it.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
Most of the lines in the spec file are independent of any build
condition.
Split the body of the spec file into scripts/package/kernel.spec.
scripts/package/mkspec will prepend some env-dependent variables.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
scripts/package/mkspec preprocesses the spec file by sed, but it is
unreadable. This commit removes the last portion of the sed scripting.
Remove the $S$M prefixes from the conditionally generated lines.
Instead, surround the code with %if %{with_devel} ... %endif.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
For the same reason as commit 4243afdb9326 ("kbuild: builddeb: always
make modules_install, to install modules.builtin*"), run modules_install
even when CONFIG_MODULES=n to install modules.builtin*.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
To reduce the preprocess of the spec file, invoke the kernel build
from rpmbuild.
Run init/build-version to increment the release number not only for
binrpm-pkg but also for srcrpm-pkg and rpm-pkg.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
If this affects only %{buildroot}, it should be enough to use a fixed
string for _arch when it is undefined.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
Avoid hard-coding the Version field in the generated spec file.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
The kernel-devel RPM package and the linux-headers Debian package
provide headers and scripts needed for building external modules.
They copy the necessary files in slightly different ways - the RPM
copies almost everything except some exclude patterns, while the Debian
copies less number of files. There is no need to maintain different code
to do the same thing.
Split the Debian code out to scripts/package/install-extmod-build, which
is called from both of the packages.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
There are some cases where we want to run a command with the same
environment variables as Kbuild uses. For example, 'make coccicheck'
invokes scripts/coccicheck from the top Makefile so that the script can
reference to ${LINUXINCLUDE}, ${KBUILD_EXTMOD}, etc. The top Makefile
defines several phony targets that run a script.
We do it also for an internally used script, which results in a somewhat
complex call graph.
One example:
debian/rules binary-arch
-> make intdeb-pkg
-> scripts/package/builddeb
It is also tedious to add a dedicated target like 'intdeb-pkg' for each
use case.
Add a generic target 'run-command' to run an arbitrary command in an
environment with all Kbuild variables set.
The usage is:
$ make run-command KBUILD_RUN_COMMAND=<command>
The concept is similar to:
$ dpkg-architecture -c <command>
This executes <command> in an environment which has all DEB_* variables
defined.
Convert the existing 'make intdeb-pkg'.
Another possible usage is to interrogate a Make variable.
$ make run-command KBUILD_RUN_COMMAND='echo $(KBUILD_CFLAGS)'
might be useful to see KBUILD_CFLAGS set by the top Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
Avoid hard-coding the value of KERNELRELEASE in the generated spec file.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
${version} will be replaced with the value of the Version field.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently, we rely on the top Makefile defining ARCH option when we
run 'make rpm-pkg' or 'make binrpm-pkg'.
It does not apply when we run 'make srcrpm-pkg', and separately run
'rpmbuild' for the generated SRPM. This is a problem for cross-build.
Just like the Debian package, save the value of ARCH in the spec file.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
This is useful to pass more common Make options.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently, $MAKE will expand to the GNU Make program that created the
source RPM. This is problematic if you carry it to a different build
host to run 'rpmbuild' there.
Consider this command:
$ /path/to/my/custom/make srcrpm-pkg
The spec file in the SRPM will record '/path/to/my/custom/make', which
exists only on that build environment.
To create a portable SRPM, the spec file should avoid hard-coding $MAKE.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
