From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-ep93xx') diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c index e5f791145bd0..874cbc91b669 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c @@ -59,13 +59,13 @@ static u64 notrace ep93xx_read_sched_clock(void) return ret; } -cycle_t ep93xx_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *c) +u64 ep93xx_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *c) { u64 ret; ret = readl(EP93XX_TIMER4_VALUE_LOW); ret |= ((u64) (readl(EP93XX_TIMER4_VALUE_HIGH) & 0xff) << 32); - return (cycle_t) ret; + return (u64) ret; } static int ep93xx_clkevt_set_next_event(unsigned long next, -- cgit v1.2.3