From 91303f800e76517d1e96d47dec290c5d5dbf1230 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Like Xu Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:26:39 +0800 Subject: KVM: x86/mmu: Move the lockdep_assert of mmu_lock to inside clear_dirty_pt_masked() Move the lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock) from the only one caller kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_pt_masked() to inside clear_dirty_pt_masked(). This change makes it more obvious why it's safe for clear_dirty_pt_masked() to use the non-atomic (for non-volatile SPTEs) tdp_mmu_clear_spte_bits() helper. for_each_tdp_mmu_root() does its own lockdep, so the only "loss" in lockdep coverage is if the list is completely empty. Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Like Xu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230627042639.12636-1-likexu@tencent.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/x86') diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c index 6250bd3d20c1..639c5f2c88f8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c @@ -1600,6 +1600,8 @@ static void clear_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root, shadow_dirty_mask; struct tdp_iter iter; + lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock); + rcu_read_lock(); tdp_root_for_each_leaf_pte(iter, root, gfn + __ffs(mask), @@ -1646,7 +1648,6 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm, { struct kvm_mmu_page *root; - lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock); for_each_tdp_mmu_root(kvm, root, slot->as_id) clear_dirty_pt_masked(kvm, root, gfn, mask, wrprot); } -- cgit v1.2.3