From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c') diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c index 54565bd0093b..0093ece661fe 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ static void samsung_clocksource_resume(struct clocksource *cs) samsung_time_start(pwm.source_id, true); } -static cycle_t notrace samsung_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *c) +static u64 notrace samsung_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *c) { return ~readl_relaxed(pwm.source_reg); } -- cgit v1.2.3