From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-32k.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-32k.c') diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-32k.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-32k.c index cf5b14e442e4..624067712ef0 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-32k.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-32k.c @@ -65,11 +65,11 @@ static inline struct ti_32k *to_ti_32k(struct clocksource *cs) return container_of(cs, struct ti_32k, cs); } -static cycle_t notrace ti_32k_read_cycles(struct clocksource *cs) +static u64 notrace ti_32k_read_cycles(struct clocksource *cs) { struct ti_32k *ti = to_ti_32k(cs); - return (cycle_t)readl_relaxed(ti->counter); + return (u64)readl_relaxed(ti->counter); } static struct ti_32k ti_32k_timer = { -- cgit v1.2.3