From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c') diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c index b15069483fbd..d02b51075ad1 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static void __iomem *regbase; -static cycle_t vt8500_timer_read(struct clocksource *cs) +static u64 vt8500_timer_read(struct clocksource *cs) { int loops = msecs_to_loops(10); writel(3, regbase + TIMER_CTRL_VAL); @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int vt8500_timer_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles, struct clock_event_device *evt) { int loops = msecs_to_loops(10); - cycle_t alarm = clocksource.read(&clocksource) + cycles; + u64 alarm = clocksource.read(&clocksource) + cycles; while ((readl(regbase + TIMER_AS_VAL) & TIMER_MATCH_W_ACTIVE) && --loops) cpu_relax(); -- cgit v1.2.3