From f1a0898b5d6a77d332d036da03bad6fa9770de5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hugh Dickins Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 14:29:39 -0700 Subject: wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: spin_lock_bh() to fix lockdep regression Lockdep on 6.4-rc on ThinkPad X1 Carbon 5th says ===================================================== WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 6.4.0-rc5 #1 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- kworker/3:1/49 [HC0[0]:SC0[4]:HE1:SE0] is trying to acquire: ffff8881066fa368 (&mvm_sta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rs_drv_get_rate+0x46/0xe7 and this task is already holding: ffff8881066f80a8 (&sta->rate_ctrl_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rate_control_get_rate+0xbd/0x126 which would create a new lock dependency: (&sta->rate_ctrl_lock){+.-.}-{2:2} -> (&mvm_sta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock){+.+.}-{2:2} but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock: (&sta->rate_ctrl_lock){+.-.}-{2:2} etc. etc. etc. Changing the spin_lock() in rs_drv_get_rate() to spin_lock_bh() was not enough to pacify lockdep, but changing them all on pers.lock has worked. Fixes: a8938bc881d2 ("wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: Add locking to the rate read flow") Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/79ffcc22-9775-cb6d-3ffd-1a517c40beef@google.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg --- drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers') diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c index 23266d0c9ce4..9a20468345e4 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c @@ -2692,7 +2692,7 @@ static void rs_drv_get_rate(void *mvm_r, struct ieee80211_sta *sta, lq_sta = mvm_sta; - spin_lock(&lq_sta->pers.lock); + spin_lock_bh(&lq_sta->pers.lock); iwl_mvm_hwrate_to_tx_rate_v1(lq_sta->last_rate_n_flags, info->band, &info->control.rates[0]); info->control.rates[0].count = 1; @@ -2707,7 +2707,7 @@ static void rs_drv_get_rate(void *mvm_r, struct ieee80211_sta *sta, iwl_mvm_hwrate_to_tx_rate_v1(last_ucode_rate, info->band, &txrc->reported_rate); } - spin_unlock(&lq_sta->pers.lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&lq_sta->pers.lock); } static void *rs_drv_alloc_sta(void *mvm_rate, struct ieee80211_sta *sta, @@ -3264,11 +3264,11 @@ void iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_sta *sta, /* If it's locked we are in middle of init flow * just wait for next tx status to update the lq_sta data */ - if (!spin_trylock(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock)) + if (!spin_trylock_bh(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock)) return; __iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(mvm, sta, tid, info, ndp); - spin_unlock(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock); } #ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_DEBUGFS @@ -4117,9 +4117,9 @@ void iwl_mvm_rs_rate_init(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, } else { struct iwl_mvm_sta *mvmsta = iwl_mvm_sta_from_mac80211(sta); - spin_lock(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock); + spin_lock_bh(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock); rs_drv_rate_init(mvm, sta, band); - spin_unlock(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock); } } -- cgit v1.2.3