From 204f45140faa0772d2ca1b3de96d1c0fb3db8e77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kent Overstreet Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:14:36 -0500 Subject: bcachefs: Fix BTREE_ITER_FILTER_SNAPSHOTS on inodes btree If we're in FILTER_SNAPSHOTS mode and we start scanning a range of the keyspace where no keys are visible in the current snapshot, we have a problem - we'll scan for a very long time before scanning terminates. Awhile back, this was fixed for most cases with peek_upto() (and assertions that enforce that it's being used). But the fix missed the fact that the inodes btree is different - every key offset is in a different snapshot tree, not just the inode field. Fixes: Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet --- fs/bcachefs/btree_iter.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/bcachefs') diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/btree_iter.c b/fs/bcachefs/btree_iter.c index 5467a8635be1..3ef338df82f5 100644 --- a/fs/bcachefs/btree_iter.c +++ b/fs/bcachefs/btree_iter.c @@ -2156,7 +2156,9 @@ struct bkey_s_c bch2_btree_iter_peek_upto(struct btree_iter *iter, struct bpos e * isn't monotonically increasing before FILTER_SNAPSHOTS, and * that's what we check against in extents mode: */ - if (k.k->p.inode > end.inode) + if (unlikely(!(iter->flags & BTREE_ITER_IS_EXTENTS) + ? bkey_gt(k.k->p, end) + : k.k->p.inode > end.inode)) goto end; if (iter->update_path && -- cgit v1.2.3