From 39f9d028c9906cc7b625df84442205f6bcc84477 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Liu Bo Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:01:22 +0000 Subject: Btrfs: save us a read_lock This does not change the logic of code, but can save us a read_lock. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/locking.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/locking.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c index 2a1762c66041..e95df435d897 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c @@ -113,11 +113,10 @@ again: read_unlock(&eb->lock); return; } - read_unlock(&eb->lock); - wait_event(eb->write_lock_wq, atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0); - read_lock(&eb->lock); if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) { read_unlock(&eb->lock); + wait_event(eb->write_lock_wq, + atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0); goto again; } atomic_inc(&eb->read_locks); -- cgit v1.2.3