From 14ff8e1970c03831bf64cf098f56e6ba83349170 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Sterba Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 17:06:10 +0100 Subject: btrfs: no need to run delayed refs after commit_fs_roots during commit The inode number cache has been removed in this dev cycle, there's one more leftover. We don't need to run the delayed refs again after commit_fs_roots as stated in the comment, because btrfs_save_ino_cache is no more since 5297199a8bca ("btrfs: remove inode number cache feature"). Nothing else between commit_fs_roots and btrfs_qgroup_account_extents could create new delayed refs so the qgroup consistency should be safe. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c index 8e0f7a1029c6..6af7f2bf92de 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c @@ -2264,14 +2264,6 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) */ btrfs_free_log_root_tree(trans, fs_info); - /* - * commit_fs_roots() can call btrfs_save_ino_cache(), which generates - * new delayed refs. Must handle them or qgroup can be wrong. - */ - ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, (unsigned long)-1); - if (ret) - goto unlock_tree_log; - /* * Since fs roots are all committed, we can get a quite accurate * new_roots. So let's do quota accounting. -- cgit v1.2.3 From 518837e65068c385dddc0a87b3e577c8be7c13b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:41:42 +0000 Subject: btrfs: send: fix invalid clone operations when cloning from the same file and root When an incremental send finds an extent that is shared, it checks which file extent items in the range refer to that extent, and for those it emits clone operations, while for others it emits regular write operations to avoid corruption at the destination (as described and fixed by commit d906d49fc5f4 ("Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning operations")). However when the root we are cloning from is the send root, we are cloning from the inode currently being processed and the source file range has several extent items that partially point to the desired extent, with an offset smaller than the offset in the file extent item for the range we want to clone into, it can cause the algorithm to issue a clone operation that starts at the current eof of the file being processed in the receiver side, in which case the receiver will fail, with EINVAL, when attempting to execute the clone operation. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-clone.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT # Create our test file with a single and large extent (1M) and with # different content for different file ranges that will be reflinked # later. xfs_io -f \ -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 128K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcd 128K 128K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xef 256K 256K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0x1a 512K 512K" \ $MNT/foobar btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now do a series of changes to our file such that we end up with # different parts of the extent reflinked into different file offsets # and we overwrite a large part of the extent too, so no file extent # items refer to that part that was overwritten. This used to confuse # the algorithm used by the kernel to figure out which file ranges to # clone, making it attempt to clone from a source range starting at # the current eof of the file, resulting in the receiver to fail since # it is an invalid clone operation. # xfs_io -c "reflink $MNT/foobar 64K 1M 960K" \ -c "reflink $MNT/foobar 0K 512K 256K" \ -c "reflink $MNT/foobar 512K 128K 256K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0x73 384K 640K" \ $MNT/foobar btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 echo -e "\nFile digest in the original filesystem:" md5sum $MNT/snap2/foobar # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to # apply both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT # Must match what we got in the original filesystem of course. echo -e "\nFile digest in the new filesystem:" md5sum $MNT/snap2/foobar umount $MNT When running the reproducer, the incremental send operation fails due to an invalid clone operation: $ ./test-send-clone.sh wrote 131072/131072 bytes at offset 0 128 KiB, 32 ops; 0.0015 sec (80.906 MiB/sec and 20711.9741 ops/sec) wrote 131072/131072 bytes at offset 131072 128 KiB, 32 ops; 0.0013 sec (90.514 MiB/sec and 23171.6148 ops/sec) wrote 262144/262144 bytes at offset 262144 256 KiB, 64 ops; 0.0025 sec (98.270 MiB/sec and 25157.2327 ops/sec) wrote 524288/524288 bytes at offset 524288 512 KiB, 128 ops; 0.0052 sec (95.730 MiB/sec and 24506.9883 ops/sec) Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 linked 983040/983040 bytes at offset 1048576 960 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0006 sec (1.419 GiB/sec and 1550.3876 ops/sec) linked 262144/262144 bytes at offset 524288 256 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0020 sec (120.192 MiB/sec and 480.7692 ops/sec) linked 262144/262144 bytes at offset 131072 256 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0018 sec (133.833 MiB/sec and 535.3319 ops/sec) wrote 655360/655360 bytes at offset 393216 640 KiB, 160 ops; 0.0093 sec (66.781 MiB/sec and 17095.8436 ops/sec) Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 File digest in the original filesystem: 9c13c61cb0b9f5abf45344375cb04dfa /mnt/sdi/snap2/foobar At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: failed to clone extents to foobar: Invalid argument File digest in the new filesystem: 132f0396da8f48d2e667196bff882cfc /mnt/sdi/snap2/foobar The clone operation is invalid because its source range starts at the current eof of the file in the receiver, causing the receiver to get an EINVAL error from the clone operation when attempting it. For the example above, what happens is the following: 1) When processing the extent at file offset 1M, the algorithm checks that the extent is shared and can be (fully or partially) found at file offset 0. At this point the file has a size (and eof) of 1M at the receiver; 2) It finds that our extent item at file offset 1M has a data offset of 64K and, since the file extent item at file offset 0 has a data offset of 0, it issues a clone operation, from the same file and root, that has a source range offset of 64K, destination offset of 1M and a length of 64K, since the extent item at file offset 0 refers only to the first 128K of the shared extent. After this clone operation, the file size (and eof) at the receiver is increased from 1M to 1088K (1M + 64K); 3) Now there's still 896K (960K - 64K) of data left to clone or write, so it checks for the next file extent item, which starts at file offset 128K. This file extent item has a data offset of 0 and a length of 256K, so a clone operation with a source range offset of 256K, a destination offset of 1088K (1M + 64K) and length of 128K is issued. After this operation the file size (and eof) at the receiver increases from 1088K to 1216K (1088K + 128K); 4) Now there's still 768K (896K - 128K) of data left to clone or write, so it checks for the next file extent item, located at file offset 384K. This file extent item points to a different extent, not the one we want to clone, with a length of 640K. So we issue a write operation into the file range 1216K (1088K + 128K, end of the last clone operation), with a length of 640K and with a data matching the one we can find for that range in send root. After this operation, the file size (and eof) at the receiver increases from 1216K to 1856K (1216K + 640K); 5) Now there's still 128K (768K - 640K) of data left to clone or write, so we look into the file extent item, which is for file offset 1M and it points to the extent we want to clone, with a data offset of 64K and a length of 960K. However this matches the file offset we started with, the start of the range to clone into. So we can't for sure find any file extent item from here onwards with the rest of the data we want to clone, yet we proceed and since the file extent item points to the shared extent, with a data offset of 64K, we issue a clone operation with a source range starting at file offset 1856K, which matches the file extent item's offset, 1M, plus the amount of data cloned and written so far, which is 64K (step 2) + 128K (step 3) + 640K (step 4). This clone operation is invalid since the source range offset matches the current eof of the file in the receiver. We should have stopped looking for extents to clone at this point and instead fallback to write, which would simply the contain the data in the file range from 1856K to 1856K + 128K. So fix this by stopping the loop that looks for file ranges to clone at clone_range() when we reach the current eof of the file being processed, if we are cloning from the same file and using the send root as the clone root. This ensures any data not yet cloned will be sent to the receiver through a write operation. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ Fixes: 11f2069c113e ("Btrfs: send, allow clone operations within the same file") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.5+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/send.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c index ae97f4dbaff3..78a35374d492 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/send.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c @@ -5512,6 +5512,21 @@ static int clone_range(struct send_ctx *sctx, break; offset += clone_len; clone_root->offset += clone_len; + + /* + * If we are cloning from the file we are currently processing, + * and using the send root as the clone root, we must stop once + * the current clone offset reaches the current eof of the file + * at the receiver, otherwise we would issue an invalid clone + * operation (source range going beyond eof) and cause the + * receiver to fail. So if we reach the current eof, bail out + * and fallback to a regular write. + */ + if (clone_root->root == sctx->send_root && + clone_root->ino == sctx->cur_ino && + clone_root->offset >= sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset) + break; + data_offset += clone_len; next: path->slots[0]++; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 18d3bff411c8d46d40537483bdc0b61b33ce0371 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:22:05 -0500 Subject: btrfs: don't get an EINTR during drop_snapshot for reloc This was partially fixed by f3e3d9cc3525 ("btrfs: avoid possible signal interruption of btrfs_drop_snapshot() on relocation tree"), however it missed a spot when we restart a trans handle because we need to end the transaction. The fix is the same, simply use btrfs_join_transaction() instead of btrfs_start_transaction() when deleting reloc roots. Fixes: f3e3d9cc3525 ("btrfs: avoid possible signal interruption of btrfs_drop_snapshot() on relocation tree") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index d79b8369e6aa..30b1a630dc2f 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -5549,7 +5549,15 @@ int btrfs_drop_snapshot(struct btrfs_root *root, int update_ref, int for_reloc) goto out_free; } - trans = btrfs_start_transaction(tree_root, 0); + /* + * Use join to avoid potential EINTR from transaction + * start. See wait_reserve_ticket and the whole + * reservation callchain. + */ + if (for_reloc) + trans = btrfs_join_transaction(tree_root); + else + trans = btrfs_start_transaction(tree_root, 0); if (IS_ERR(trans)) { err = PTR_ERR(trans); goto out_free; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 49ecc679ab48b40ca799bf94b327d5284eac9e46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:22:11 -0500 Subject: btrfs: do not double free backref nodes on error Zygo reported the following KASAN splat: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888112402950 by task btrfs/28836 CPU: 0 PID: 28836 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 5.10.0-e35f27394290-for-next+ #23 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xbc/0xf9 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 print_address_description.constprop.8+0x21/0x210 ? record_print_text.cold.34+0x11/0x11 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 kasan_report.cold.10+0x20/0x37 ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 __asan_load8+0x69/0x90 btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420 btrfs_backref_release_cache+0x83/0x1b0 relocate_block_group+0x394/0x780 ? merge_reloc_roots+0x4a0/0x4a0 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120 btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900 ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0 ? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x120/0x120 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xa06/0xcb0 ? _copy_from_user+0x83/0xc0 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460 btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0 ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20 ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x18/0x30 ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0 ? lock_downgrade+0x3f0/0x3f0 ? handle_mm_fault+0xad6/0x2150 ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xfc/0x9d0 ? ioctl_file_clone+0xe0/0xe0 ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0 ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0 ? check_flags+0x26/0x30 ? lock_is_held_type+0xc3/0xf0 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1b/0x60 ? do_syscall_64+0x13/0x80 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? __fget_light+0xae/0x110 __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7f4c4bdfe427 Allocated by task 28836: kasan_save_stack+0x21/0x50 __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.18+0xbe/0xd0 kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x410/0xcb0 btrfs_backref_alloc_node+0x46/0xf0 btrfs_backref_add_tree_node+0x60d/0x11d0 build_backref_tree+0xc5/0x700 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2be/0xb90 relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120 btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460 btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360 __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Freed by task 28836: kasan_save_stack+0x21/0x50 kasan_set_track+0x20/0x30 kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x30 __kasan_slab_free+0xf3/0x140 kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10 kfree+0xde/0x200 btrfs_backref_error_cleanup+0x452/0x530 build_backref_tree+0x1a5/0x700 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2be/0xb90 relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120 btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460 btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360 __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This occurred because we freed our backref node in btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(), but then tried to free it again in btrfs_backref_release_cache(). This is because btrfs_backref_release_cache() will cycle through all of the cache->leaves nodes and free them up. However btrfs_backref_error_cleanup() freed the backref node with btrfs_backref_free_node(), which simply kfree()d the backref node without unlinking it from the cache. Change this to a btrfs_backref_drop_node(), which does the appropriate cleanup and removes the node from the cache->leaves list, so when we go to free the remaining cache we don't trip over items we've already dropped. Fixes: 75bfb9aff45e ("Btrfs: cleanup error handling in build_backref_tree") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/backref.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c index 02d7d7b2563b..9cadacf3ec27 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c @@ -3117,7 +3117,7 @@ void btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(struct btrfs_backref_cache *cache, list_del_init(&lower->list); if (lower == node) node = NULL; - btrfs_backref_free_node(cache, lower); + btrfs_backref_drop_node(cache, lower); } btrfs_backref_cleanup_node(cache, node); -- cgit v1.2.3 From fb286100974e7239af243bc2255a52f29442f9c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:22:14 -0500 Subject: btrfs: fix lockdep splat in btrfs_recover_relocation While testing the error paths of relocation I hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.10.0-rc6+ #217 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ mount/779 is trying to acquire lock: ffffa0e676945418 (&fs_info->balance_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 but task is already holding lock: ffffa0e60ee31da8 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 btrfs_search_slot+0x462/0x8f0 btrfs_update_root+0x55/0x2b0 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x398/0x750 clean_dirty_subvols+0xdf/0x120 btrfs_recover_relocation+0x534/0x5a0 btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0xcb/0x170 open_ctree+0x151f/0x1726 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x433/0xc10 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: start_transaction+0x444/0x700 insert_balance_item.isra.0+0x37/0x320 btrfs_balance+0x354/0xf40 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x2cf/0x380 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&fs_info->balance_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1120/0x1e10 lock_acquire+0x116/0x370 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 open_ctree+0x1095/0x1726 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x433/0xc10 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &fs_info->balance_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-root-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(sb_internal#2); lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by mount/779: #0: ffffa0e60dc040e0 (&type->s_umount_key#47/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xb5/0x380 #1: ffffa0e60ee31da8 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 779 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.10.0-rc6+ #217 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260 __lock_acquire+0x1120/0x1e10 lock_acquire+0x116/0x370 ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2c4/0x2f0 ? btrfs_get_64+0x5e/0x100 btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340 open_ctree+0x1095/0x1726 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380 ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x2f2/0x320 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 ? capable+0x3a/0x60 path_mount+0x433/0xc10 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This is straightforward to fix, simply release the path before we setup the balance_ctl. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 2c0aa03b6437..0c7f4f6237e8 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -4318,6 +4318,8 @@ int btrfs_recover_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) btrfs_warn(fs_info, "balance: cannot set exclusive op status, resume manually"); + btrfs_release_path(path); + mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex); BUG_ON(fs_info->balance_ctl); spin_lock(&fs_info->balance_lock); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 34d1eb0e599875064955a74712f08ff14c8e3d5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:22:17 -0500 Subject: btrfs: don't clear ret in btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups If we fail to update a block group item in the loop we'll break, however we'll do btrfs_run_delayed_refs and lose our error value in ret, and thus not clean up properly. Fix this by only running the delayed refs if there was no failure. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c index 52f2198d44c9..0886e81e5540 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c @@ -2669,7 +2669,8 @@ again: * Go through delayed refs for all the stuff we've just kicked off * and then loop back (just once) */ - ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, 0); + if (!ret) + ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, 0); if (!ret && loops == 0) { loops++; spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock); -- cgit v1.2.3