From e840f42a49925707fca90e6c7a4095118fdb8c4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Zyngier Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 14:09:49 +0100 Subject: KVM: arm64: Fix PMU probe ordering Russell reported that since 5.13, KVM's probing of the PMU has started to fail on his HW. As it turns out, there is an implicit ordering dependency between the architectural PMU probing code and and KVM's own probing. If, due to probe ordering reasons, KVM probes before the PMU driver, it will fail to detect the PMU and prevent it from being advertised to guests as well as the VMM. Obviously, this is one probing too many, and we should be able to deal with any ordering. Add a callback from the PMU code into KVM to advertise the registration of a host CPU PMU, allowing for any probing order. Fixes: 5421db1be3b1 ("KVM: arm64: Divorce the perf code from oprofile helpers") Reported-by: "Russell King (Oracle)" Tested-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YUYRKVflRtUytzy5@shell.armlinux.org.uk Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/kvm') diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h index 864b9997efb2..90f21898aad8 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h @@ -61,7 +61,6 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr); int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); -int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void); #else struct kvm_pmu { }; @@ -118,8 +117,6 @@ static inline u64 kvm_pmu_get_pmceid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool pmceid1) return 0; } -static inline int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void) { return 0xf; } - #endif #endif -- cgit v1.2.3