From 79a8810221ee9ea96c4e5a5817afb88f22ea698c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Henderson Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:07:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] alpha: fix "statement with no effect" warnings Apparently gcc 4.0 complains about "({ 0; });", which leads to -Werror breakage in one of the alpha oprofile modules. One might could argue that this is a gcc bug, in that statement-expressions should be considered to be function-like rather than statement-like for the purposes of this warning. But it's just as easy to use an inline function in the first place, side-stepping the issue. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- include/linux/smp.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/linux') diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h index 9dfa3ee769ae..22b451d1b93f 100644 --- a/include/linux/smp.h +++ b/include/linux/smp.h @@ -94,11 +94,23 @@ void smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void); */ #define raw_smp_processor_id() 0 #define hard_smp_processor_id() 0 -#define smp_call_function(func,info,retry,wait) ({ 0; }) -#define on_each_cpu(func,info,retry,wait) ({ func(info); 0; }) -static inline void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu) { } #define num_booting_cpus() 1 -#define smp_prepare_boot_cpu() do {} while (0) + +static inline int smp_call_function(void (*func) (void *), void *info, + int retry, int wait) +{ + return 0; +} + +static inline int on_each_cpu(void (*func) (void *), void *info, + int retry, int wait) +{ + func(info); + return 0; +} + +static inline void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu) { } +static inline void smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void) { } #endif /* !SMP */ -- cgit v1.2.3