From 54e9e29132d7caefcad470281cae06ac34a982c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:00:39 -0700
Subject: mm, oom: pass an oom order of -1 when triggered by sysrq

The force_kill member of struct oom_control isn't needed if an order of -1
is used instead.  This is the same as order == -1 in struct
compact_control which requires full memory compaction.

This patch introduces no functional change.

Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 include/linux/oom.h | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'include')

diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
index cb29085ded37..8fb67b9e6110 100644
--- a/include/linux/oom.h
+++ b/include/linux/oom.h
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ struct oom_control {
 	nodemask_t	*nodemask;
 	gfp_t		gfp_mask;
 	int		order;
-	bool		force_kill;
 };
 
 /*
-- 
cgit v1.2.3