From 9ecea9ae4d3127a09fb5dfcea87f248937a39ff5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yury Norov Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 07:12:37 -0700 Subject: sched/topology: Handle NUMA_NO_NODE in sched_numa_find_nth_cpu() sched_numa_find_nth_cpu() doesn't handle NUMA_NO_NODE properly, and may crash kernel if passed with it. On the other hand, the only user of sched_numa_find_nth_cpu() has to check NUMA_NO_NODE case explicitly. It would be easier for users if this logic will get moved into sched_numa_find_nth_cpu(). Signed-off-by: Yury Norov Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Cc: Mel Gorman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230819141239.287290-6-yury.norov@gmail.com --- lib/cpumask.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/cpumask.c b/lib/cpumask.c index a7fd02b5ae26..34335c1e7265 100644 --- a/lib/cpumask.c +++ b/lib/cpumask.c @@ -146,9 +146,7 @@ unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node) /* Wrap: we always want a cpu. */ i %= num_online_cpus(); - cpu = (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) ? - cpumask_nth(i, cpu_online_mask) : - sched_numa_find_nth_cpu(cpu_online_mask, i, node); + cpu = sched_numa_find_nth_cpu(cpu_online_mask, i, node); WARN_ON(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids); return cpu; -- cgit v1.2.3