From 669996add4c92476e0f8d6b4cd2bb308d1939fd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trond Myklebust Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:02:21 -0400 Subject: SUNRPC: Destroy the back channel when we destroy the host transport When we're destroying the host transport mechanism, we should ensure that we do not leak memory by failing to release any back channel slots that might still exist. Reported-by: Neil Brown Reported-by: kbuild test robot Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker --- net/sunrpc/backchannel_rqst.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'net/sunrpc/backchannel_rqst.c') diff --git a/net/sunrpc/backchannel_rqst.c b/net/sunrpc/backchannel_rqst.c index 7eb251372f94..195b40c5dae4 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/backchannel_rqst.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/backchannel_rqst.c @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ void xprt_destroy_bc(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, unsigned int max_reqs) goto out; spin_lock_bh(&xprt->bc_pa_lock); - xprt->bc_alloc_max -= max_reqs; + xprt->bc_alloc_max -= min(max_reqs, xprt->bc_alloc_max); list_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &xprt->bc_pa_list, rq_bc_pa_list) { dprintk("RPC: req=%p\n", req); list_del(&req->rq_bc_pa_list); -- cgit v1.2.3