diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2022-10-03 20:23:32 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2022-10-03 20:23:32 +0300 |
commit | f3dfe925f9548a4337883926db542ccf4ca55fe1 (patch) | |
tree | fe3356bdbd5b692a05f44c8946268cb1ac14947b /Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst | |
parent | 890f242084c9eac18ef87031d95e0bdbaac01ed4 (diff) | |
parent | 69d517e6e21099f81efbd39e47874649ae575804 (diff) | |
download | linux-f3dfe925f9548a4337883926db542ccf4ca55fe1.tar.xz |
Merge tag 'docs-6.1' of git://git.lwn.net/linux
Pull documentation updates from Jonathan Corbet:
"There's not a huge amount of activity in the docs tree this time
around, but a few significant changes even so:
- A complete rewriting of the top-level index.rst file, which mostly
reflects itself in a redone top page in the HTML-rendered docs. The
hope is that the new organization will be a friendlier starting
point for both users and developers.
- Some math-rendering improvements.
- A coding-style.rst update on the use of BUG() and WARN()
- A big maintainer-PHP guide update.
- Some code-of-conduct updates
- More Chinese translation work
Plus the usual pile of typo fixes, corrections, and updates"
* tag 'docs-6.1' of git://git.lwn.net/linux: (66 commits)
checkpatch: warn on usage of VM_BUG_ON() and other BUG variants
coding-style.rst: document BUG() and WARN() rules ("do not crash the kernel")
Documentation: devres: add missing IO helper
Documentation: devres: update IRQ helper
Documentation/mm: modify page_referenced to folio_referenced
Documentation/CoC: Reflect current CoC interpretation and practices
docs/doc-guide: Add documentation on SPHINX_IMGMATH
docs: process/5.Posting.rst: clarify use of Reported-by: tag
docs, kprobes: Fix the wrong location of Kprobes
docs: add a man-pages link to the front page
docs: put atomic*.txt and memory-barriers.txt into the core-api book
docs: move asm-annotations.rst into core-api
docs: remove some index.rst cruft
docs: reconfigure the HTML left column
docs: Rewrite the front page
docs: promote the title of process/index.rst
Documentation: devres: add missing SPI helper
Documentation: devres: add missing PINCTRL helpers
docs: hugetlbpage.rst: fix a typo of hugepage size
docs/zh_CN: Add new translation of admin-guide/bootconfig.rst
...
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst | 26 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst index e899f14a4ba2..922e0b547bc3 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ the Technical Advisory Board (TAB) or other maintainers if you're uncertain how to handle situations that come up. It will not be considered a violation report unless you want it to be. If you are uncertain about approaching the TAB or any other maintainers, please -reach out to our conflict mediator, Mishi Choudhary <mishi@linux.com>. +reach out to our conflict mediator, Joanna Lee <joanna.lee@gesmer.com>. In the end, "be kind to each other" is really what the end goal is for everybody. We know everyone is human and we all fail at times, but the @@ -127,10 +127,12 @@ are listed at https://kernel.org/code-of-conduct.html. Members can not access reports made before they joined or after they have left the committee. -The initial Code of Conduct Committee consists of volunteer members of -the TAB, as well as a professional mediator acting as a neutral third -party. The first task of the committee is to establish documented -processes, which will be made public. +The Code of Conduct Committee consists of volunteer community members +appointed by the TAB, as well as a professional mediator acting as a +neutral third party. The processes the Code of Conduct committee will +use to address reports is varied and will depend on the individual +circumstance, however, this file serves as documentation for the +general process used. Any member of the committee, including the mediator, can be contacted directly if a reporter does not wish to include the full committee in a @@ -141,16 +143,16 @@ processes (see above) and consults with the TAB as needed and appropriate, for instance to request and receive information about the kernel community. -Any decisions by the committee will be brought to the TAB, for -implementation of enforcement with the relevant maintainers if needed. -A decision by the Code of Conduct Committee can be overturned by the TAB -by a two-thirds vote. +Any decisions regarding enforcement recommendations will be brought to +the TAB for implementation of enforcement with the relevant maintainers +if needed. A decision by the Code of Conduct Committee can be overturned +by the TAB by a two-thirds vote. At quarterly intervals, the Code of Conduct Committee and TAB will provide a report summarizing the anonymised reports that the Code of Conduct committee has received and their status, as well details of any overridden decisions including complete and identifiable voting details. -We expect to establish a different process for Code of Conduct Committee -staffing beyond the bootstrap period. This document will be updated -with that information when this occurs. +Because how we interpret and enforce the Code of Conduct will evolve over +time, this document will be updated when necessary to reflect any +changes. |