clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vgtod.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vgtod.h
index 3a01996db58f..022e59714562 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vgtod.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vgtod.h
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ struct vsyscall_gtod_data {
 	unsigned seq;
 
 	int vclock_mode;
-	cycle_t	cycle_last;
-	cycle_t	mask;
+	u64	cycle_last;
+	u64	mask;
 	u32	mult;
 	u32	shift;