summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/panel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>2023-08-05 00:06:06 +0300
committerDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>2023-09-13 18:36:18 +0300
commit1e0465eb16a4f288a1b77b72af2f294c709ecf22 (patch)
tree4b06c0f68933a00bee8f814e64bfcc506bb4a4ed /drivers/gpu/drm/panel
parentd43f0fe153dcb963374cd5b1256ec14287f951e4 (diff)
downloadlinux-1e0465eb16a4f288a1b77b72af2f294c709ecf22.tar.xz
drm/panel: otm8009a: Don't double check prepared/enabled
As talked about in commit d2aacaf07395 ("drm/panel: Check for already prepared/enabled in drm_panel"), we want to remove needless code from panel drivers that was storing and double-checking the prepared/enabled state. Even if someone was relying on the double-check before, that double-check is now in the core and not needed in individual drivers. For the "otm8009a" driver we fully remove the storing of the "enabled" state and we remove the double-checking, but we still keep the storing of the "prepared" state since the backlight code in the driver checks it. This backlight code may not be perfectly safe since there doesn't appear to be sufficient synchronization between the backlight driver (which userspace can call into directly) and the code that's unpreparing the panel. However, this lack of safety is not new and can be addressed in a future patch. Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230804140605.RFC.3.I6a4a3c81c78acf5acdc2e5b5d936e19bf57ec07a@changeid
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/panel')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-orisetech-otm8009a.c17
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-orisetech-otm8009a.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-orisetech-otm8009a.c
index 898b892f1143..93183f30d7d6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-orisetech-otm8009a.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-orisetech-otm8009a.c
@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ struct otm8009a {
struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
struct regulator *supply;
bool prepared;
- bool enabled;
};
static const struct drm_display_mode modes[] = {
@@ -267,9 +266,6 @@ static int otm8009a_disable(struct drm_panel *panel)
struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
int ret;
- if (!ctx->enabled)
- return 0; /* This is not an issue so we return 0 here */
-
backlight_disable(ctx->bl_dev);
ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off(dsi);
@@ -282,8 +278,6 @@ static int otm8009a_disable(struct drm_panel *panel)
msleep(120);
- ctx->enabled = false;
-
return 0;
}
@@ -291,9 +285,6 @@ static int otm8009a_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
{
struct otm8009a *ctx = panel_to_otm8009a(panel);
- if (!ctx->prepared)
- return 0;
-
if (ctx->reset_gpio) {
gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 1);
msleep(20);
@@ -311,9 +302,6 @@ static int otm8009a_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
struct otm8009a *ctx = panel_to_otm8009a(panel);
int ret;
- if (ctx->prepared)
- return 0;
-
ret = regulator_enable(ctx->supply);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to enable supply: %d\n", ret);
@@ -341,13 +329,8 @@ static int otm8009a_enable(struct drm_panel *panel)
{
struct otm8009a *ctx = panel_to_otm8009a(panel);
- if (ctx->enabled)
- return 0;
-
backlight_enable(ctx->bl_dev);
- ctx->enabled = true;
-
return 0;
}