dlm: use spin_lock_bh for message processing

Use spin_lock_bh for all spinlocks involved in message processing,
in preparation for softirq message processing.  DLM lock requests
from user space involve dlm processing in user context, in addition
to the standard kernel context, necessitating bh variants.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/fs/dlm/user.c b/fs/dlm/user.c
index b4971ba4bdd6..3173b974e8c8 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/user.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/user.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ void dlm_user_add_ast(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, uint32_t flags, int mode,
 		return;
 
 	ls = lkb->lkb_resource->res_ls;
-	spin_lock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
+	spin_lock_bh(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
 
 	/* If ORPHAN/DEAD flag is set, it means the process is dead so an ast
 	   can't be delivered.  For ORPHAN's, dlm_clear_proc_locks() freed
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ void dlm_user_add_ast(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, uint32_t flags, int mode,
 	if ((flags & DLM_CB_CAST) && lkb_is_endoflife(mode, status))
 		set_bit(DLM_IFL_ENDOFLIFE_BIT, &lkb->lkb_iflags);
 
-	spin_lock(&proc->asts_spin);
+	spin_lock_bh(&proc->asts_spin);
 
 	rv = dlm_queue_lkb_callback(lkb, flags, mode, status, sbflags, &cb);
 	switch (rv) {
@@ -232,23 +232,23 @@ void dlm_user_add_ast(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, uint32_t flags, int mode,
 	case DLM_ENQUEUE_CALLBACK_FAILURE:
 		fallthrough;
 	default:
-		spin_unlock(&proc->asts_spin);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&proc->asts_spin);
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 		goto out;
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&proc->asts_spin);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&proc->asts_spin);
 
 	if (test_bit(DLM_IFL_ENDOFLIFE_BIT, &lkb->lkb_iflags)) {
 		/* N.B. spin_lock locks_spin, not asts_spin */
-		spin_lock(&proc->locks_spin);
+		spin_lock_bh(&proc->locks_spin);
 		if (!list_empty(&lkb->lkb_ownqueue)) {
 			list_del_init(&lkb->lkb_ownqueue);
 			dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
 		}
-		spin_unlock(&proc->locks_spin);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&proc->locks_spin);
 	}
  out:
-	spin_unlock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
 }
 
 static int device_user_lock(struct dlm_user_proc *proc,
@@ -817,10 +817,10 @@ static ssize_t device_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
 	if (test_bit(DLM_PROC_FLAGS_CLOSING, &proc->flags))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	spin_lock(&proc->asts_spin);
+	spin_lock_bh(&proc->asts_spin);
 	if (list_empty(&proc->asts)) {
 		if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
-			spin_unlock(&proc->asts_spin);
+			spin_unlock_bh(&proc->asts_spin);
 			return -EAGAIN;
 		}
 
@@ -829,16 +829,16 @@ static ssize_t device_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
 	repeat:
 		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		if (list_empty(&proc->asts) && !signal_pending(current)) {
-			spin_unlock(&proc->asts_spin);
+			spin_unlock_bh(&proc->asts_spin);
 			schedule();
-			spin_lock(&proc->asts_spin);
+			spin_lock_bh(&proc->asts_spin);
 			goto repeat;
 		}
 		set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
 		remove_wait_queue(&proc->wait, &wait);
 
 		if (signal_pending(current)) {
-			spin_unlock(&proc->asts_spin);
+			spin_unlock_bh(&proc->asts_spin);
 			return -ERESTARTSYS;
 		}
 	}
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static ssize_t device_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
 
 	cb = list_first_entry(&proc->asts, struct dlm_callback, list);
 	list_del(&cb->list);
-	spin_unlock(&proc->asts_spin);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&proc->asts_spin);
 
 	if (cb->flags & DLM_CB_BAST) {
 		trace_dlm_bast(cb->ls_id, cb->lkb_id, cb->mode, cb->res_name,
@@ -874,12 +874,12 @@ static __poll_t device_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
 
 	poll_wait(file, &proc->wait, wait);
 
-	spin_lock(&proc->asts_spin);
+	spin_lock_bh(&proc->asts_spin);
 	if (!list_empty(&proc->asts)) {
-		spin_unlock(&proc->asts_spin);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&proc->asts_spin);
 		return EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&proc->asts_spin);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&proc->asts_spin);
 	return 0;
 }