diff options
author | Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> | 2022-10-25 21:45:16 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2022-10-26 09:11:46 +0300 |
commit | 271de525e1d7f564e88a9d212c50998b49a54476 (patch) | |
tree | 556578ff32ceed2a81bfc0333a041c5fd789ff5c /include/linux/bpf.h | |
parent | f3c51fe02c55bd944662714e5b91b96dc271ad9f (diff) | |
download | linux-271de525e1d7f564e88a9d212c50998b49a54476.tar.xz |
bpf: Remove prog->active check for bpf_lsm and bpf_iter
The commit 64696c40d03c ("bpf: Add __bpf_prog_{enter,exit}_struct_ops for struct_ops trampoline")
removed prog->active check for struct_ops prog. The bpf_lsm
and bpf_iter is also using trampoline. Like struct_ops, the bpf_lsm
and bpf_iter have fixed hooks for the prog to attach. The
kernel does not call the same hook in a recursive way.
This patch also removes the prog->active check for
bpf_lsm and bpf_iter.
A later patch has a test to reproduce the recursion issue
for a sleepable bpf_lsm program.
This patch appends the '_recur' naming to the existing
enter and exit functions that track the prog->active counter.
New __bpf_prog_{enter,exit}[_sleepable] function are
added to skip the prog->active tracking. The '_struct_ops'
version is also removed.
It also moves the decision on picking the enter and exit function to
the new bpf_trampoline_{enter,exit}(). It returns the '_recur' ones
for all tracing progs to use. For bpf_lsm, bpf_iter,
struct_ops (no prog->active tracking after 64696c40d03c), and
bpf_lsm_cgroup (no prog->active tracking after 69fd337a975c7),
it will return the functions that don't track the prog->active.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-2-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/bpf.h')
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/bpf.h | 24 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 9e7d46d16032..1279e699dc98 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -854,22 +854,18 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *tr, void *image, void *i const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags, struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks, void *orig_call); -/* these two functions are called from generated trampoline */ -u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx); -void notrace __bpf_prog_exit(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx); -u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx); -void notrace __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, - struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx); -u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_lsm_cgroup(struct bpf_prog *prog, - struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx); -void notrace __bpf_prog_exit_lsm_cgroup(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, - struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx); -u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_struct_ops(struct bpf_prog *prog, - struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx); -void notrace __bpf_prog_exit_struct_ops(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, - struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx); +u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur(struct bpf_prog *prog, + struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx); +void notrace __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable_recur(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, + struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx); void notrace __bpf_tramp_enter(struct bpf_tramp_image *tr); void notrace __bpf_tramp_exit(struct bpf_tramp_image *tr); +typedef u64 (*bpf_trampoline_enter_t)(struct bpf_prog *prog, + struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx); +typedef void (*bpf_trampoline_exit_t)(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, + struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx); +bpf_trampoline_enter_t bpf_trampoline_enter(const struct bpf_prog *prog); +bpf_trampoline_exit_t bpf_trampoline_exit(const struct bpf_prog *prog); struct bpf_ksym { unsigned long start; |