diff options
| author | Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> | 2023-11-30 21:52:22 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2023-12-06 21:02:59 +0300 |
| commit | 66d636d70a79c1d37e3eea67ab50969e6aaef983 (patch) | |
| tree | eb838d10ef24f65149fd1984d73d6b7a755156b8 /include/linux | |
| parent | c3dd6e94df7193f33f45d33303f5e85afb2a72dc (diff) | |
| download | linux-66d636d70a79c1d37e3eea67ab50969e6aaef983.tar.xz | |
bpf,lsm: refactor bpf_map_alloc/bpf_map_free LSM hooks
Similarly to bpf_prog_alloc LSM hook, rename and extend bpf_map_alloc
hook into bpf_map_create, taking not just struct bpf_map, but also
bpf_attr and bpf_token, to give a fuller context to LSMs.
Unlike bpf_prog_alloc, there is no need to move the hook around, as it
currently is firing right before allocating BPF map ID and FD, which
seems to be a sweet spot.
But like bpf_prog_alloc/bpf_prog_free combo, make sure that bpf_map_free
LSM hook is called even if bpf_map_create hook returned error, as if few
LSMs are combined together it could be that one LSM successfully
allocated security blob for its needs, while subsequent LSM rejected BPF
map creation. The former LSM would still need to free up LSM blob, so we
need to ensure security_bpf_map_free() is called regardless of the
outcome.
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-11-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/security.h | 6 |
2 files changed, 7 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h index 41ec4a7c070e..adb25cc63ce3 100644 --- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h @@ -398,8 +398,9 @@ LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, audit_rule_free, void *lsmrule) LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf, int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size) LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_map, struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode) LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_prog, struct bpf_prog *prog) -LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_map_alloc_security, struct bpf_map *map) -LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, bpf_map_free_security, struct bpf_map *map) +LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_map_create, struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr, + struct bpf_token *token) +LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, bpf_map_free, struct bpf_map *map) LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_prog_load, struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_token *token) LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, bpf_prog_free, struct bpf_prog *prog) diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h index 65467eef6678..08fd777cbe94 100644 --- a/include/linux/security.h +++ b/include/linux/security.h @@ -2025,7 +2025,8 @@ struct bpf_token; extern int security_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size); extern int security_bpf_map(struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode); extern int security_bpf_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog); -extern int security_bpf_map_alloc(struct bpf_map *map); +extern int security_bpf_map_create(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr, + struct bpf_token *token); extern void security_bpf_map_free(struct bpf_map *map); extern int security_bpf_prog_load(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_token *token); @@ -2047,7 +2048,8 @@ static inline int security_bpf_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog) return 0; } -static inline int security_bpf_map_alloc(struct bpf_map *map) +static inline int security_bpf_map_create(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr, + struct bpf_token *token) { return 0; } |