diff options
author | Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> | 2022-11-17 23:52:49 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2022-11-25 08:52:28 +0300 |
commit | 10bc8e4af65946b727728d7479c028742321b60a (patch) | |
tree | aa9dfc67f7c553a2ef769623d2bd9d8cbd43f64e /init | |
parent | 406c706c7b7f1730aa787e914817b8d16b1e99f6 (diff) | |
download | linux-10bc8e4af65946b727728d7479c028742321b60a.tar.xz |
vfs: fix copy_file_range() averts filesystem freeze protection
Commit 868f9f2f8e00 ("vfs: fix copy_file_range() regression in cross-fs
copies") removed fallback to generic_copy_file_range() for cross-fs
cases inside vfs_copy_file_range().
To preserve behavior of nfsd and ksmbd server-side-copy, the fallback to
generic_copy_file_range() was added in nfsd and ksmbd code, but that
call is missing sb_start_write(), fsnotify hooks and more.
Ideally, nfsd and ksmbd would pass a flag to vfs_copy_file_range() that
will take care of the fallback, but that code would be subtle and we got
vfs_copy_file_range() logic wrong too many times already.
Instead, add a flag to explicitly request vfs_copy_file_range() to
perform only generic_copy_file_range() and let nfsd and ksmbd use this
flag only in the fallback path.
This choise keeps the logic changes to minimum in the non-nfsd/ksmbd code
paths to reduce the risk of further regressions.
Fixes: 868f9f2f8e00 ("vfs: fix copy_file_range() regression in cross-fs copies")
Tested-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'init')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions