diff options
| author | Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> | 2023-08-21 22:33:09 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2023-08-25 19:23:16 +0300 |
| commit | 0816b8c6bf7fc87cec4273dc199e8f0764b9e7b1 (patch) | |
| tree | 1bdb64aaeb54516f7cced49453b9737921093546 /kernel/bpf | |
| parent | ba2464c86f182c6fdb69fe2f77a3d04c19a72357 (diff) | |
| download | linux-0816b8c6bf7fc87cec4273dc199e8f0764b9e7b1.tar.xz | |
bpf: Consider non-owning refs to refcounted nodes RCU protected
An earlier patch in the series ensures that the underlying memory of
nodes with bpf_refcount - which can have multiple owners - is not reused
until RCU grace period has elapsed. This prevents
use-after-free with non-owning references that may point to
recently-freed memory. While RCU read lock is held, it's safe to
dereference such a non-owning ref, as by definition RCU GP couldn't have
elapsed and therefore underlying memory couldn't have been reused.
From the perspective of verifier "trustedness" non-owning refs to
refcounted nodes are now trusted only in RCU CS and therefore should no
longer pass is_trusted_reg, but rather is_rcu_reg. Let's mark them
MEM_RCU in order to reflect this new state.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821193311.3290257-6-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index b875f511c3b7..4b638eb1bdad 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -8007,6 +8007,7 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED: case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU: case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF: + case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF | MEM_RCU: /* When referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID is passed to release function, * its fixed offset must be 0. In the other cases, fixed offset * can be non-zero. This was already checked above. So pass @@ -10473,6 +10474,7 @@ static int process_kf_arg_ptr_to_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, static int ref_set_non_owning(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; + struct btf_record *rec = reg_btf_record(reg); if (!state->active_lock.ptr) { verbose(env, "verifier internal error: ref_set_non_owning w/o active lock\n"); @@ -10485,6 +10487,9 @@ static int ref_set_non_owning(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state } reg->type |= NON_OWN_REF; + if (rec->refcount_off >= 0) + reg->type |= MEM_RCU; + return 0; } @@ -11322,6 +11327,11 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, struct bpf_func_state *state; struct bpf_reg_state *reg; + if (in_rbtree_lock_required_cb(env) && (rcu_lock || rcu_unlock)) { + verbose(env, "Calling bpf_rcu_read_{lock,unlock} in unnecessary rbtree callback\n"); + return -EACCES; + } + if (rcu_lock) { verbose(env, "nested rcu read lock (kernel function %s)\n", func_name); return -EINVAL; @@ -16684,7 +16694,8 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return -EINVAL; } - if (env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock) { + if (env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock && + !in_rbtree_lock_required_cb(env)) { verbose(env, "bpf_rcu_read_unlock is missing\n"); return -EINVAL; } |