diff options
author | Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> | 2023-07-18 11:38:09 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2023-07-19 03:23:10 +0300 |
commit | 0a1f7bfe35a3e1302529fa900bf0574a5dfc8ea6 (patch) | |
tree | 4d404588e36745238df0fcd16921c20afda6a041 /kernel/bpf | |
parent | 60cc1f7d0605598b47ee3c0c2b4b6fbd4da50a06 (diff) | |
download | linux-0a1f7bfe35a3e1302529fa900bf0574a5dfc8ea6.tar.xz |
bpf: Introduce internal definitions for UAPI-opaque bpf_{rb,list}_node
Structs bpf_rb_node and bpf_list_node are opaquely defined in
uapi/linux/bpf.h, as BPF program writers are not expected to touch their
fields - nor does the verifier allow them to do so.
Currently these structs are simple wrappers around structs rb_node and
list_head and linked_list / rbtree implementation just casts and passes
to library functions for those data structures. Later patches in this
series, though, will add an "owner" field to bpf_{rb,list}_node, such
that they're not just wrapping an underlying node type. Moreover, the
bpf linked_list and rbtree implementations will deal with these owner
pointers directly in a few different places.
To avoid having to do
void *owner = (void*)bpf_list_node + sizeof(struct list_head)
with opaque UAPI node types, add bpf_{list,rb}_node_kern struct
definitions to internal headers and modify linked_list and rbtree to use
the internal types where appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230718083813.3416104-3-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 23 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c index 9e80efa59a5d..d564ff97de0b 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c @@ -1942,10 +1942,11 @@ __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_refcount_acquire_impl(void *p__refcounted_kptr, void *meta return (void *)p__refcounted_kptr; } -static int __bpf_list_add(struct bpf_list_node *node, struct bpf_list_head *head, +static int __bpf_list_add(struct bpf_list_node_kern *node, + struct bpf_list_head *head, bool tail, struct btf_record *rec, u64 off) { - struct list_head *n = (void *)node, *h = (void *)head; + struct list_head *n = &node->list_head, *h = (void *)head; /* If list_head was 0-initialized by map, bpf_obj_init_field wasn't * called on its fields, so init here @@ -1967,20 +1968,20 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_front_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_list_node *node, void *meta__ign, u64 off) { + struct bpf_list_node_kern *n = (void *)node; struct btf_struct_meta *meta = meta__ign; - return __bpf_list_add(node, head, false, - meta ? meta->record : NULL, off); + return __bpf_list_add(n, head, false, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off); } __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_back_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_list_node *node, void *meta__ign, u64 off) { + struct bpf_list_node_kern *n = (void *)node; struct btf_struct_meta *meta = meta__ign; - return __bpf_list_add(node, head, true, - meta ? meta->record : NULL, off); + return __bpf_list_add(n, head, true, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off); } static struct bpf_list_node *__bpf_list_del(struct bpf_list_head *head, bool tail) @@ -2013,7 +2014,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_remove(struct bpf_rb_root *root, struct bpf_rb_node *node) { struct rb_root_cached *r = (struct rb_root_cached *)root; - struct rb_node *n = (struct rb_node *)node; + struct rb_node *n = &((struct bpf_rb_node_kern *)node)->rb_node; if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(n)) return NULL; @@ -2026,11 +2027,12 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_remove(struct bpf_rb_root *root, /* Need to copy rbtree_add_cached's logic here because our 'less' is a BPF * program */ -static int __bpf_rbtree_add(struct bpf_rb_root *root, struct bpf_rb_node *node, +static int __bpf_rbtree_add(struct bpf_rb_root *root, + struct bpf_rb_node_kern *node, void *less, struct btf_record *rec, u64 off) { struct rb_node **link = &((struct rb_root_cached *)root)->rb_root.rb_node; - struct rb_node *parent = NULL, *n = (struct rb_node *)node; + struct rb_node *parent = NULL, *n = &node->rb_node; bpf_callback_t cb = (bpf_callback_t)less; bool leftmost = true; @@ -2060,8 +2062,9 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_rbtree_add_impl(struct bpf_rb_root *root, struct bpf_rb_node void *meta__ign, u64 off) { struct btf_struct_meta *meta = meta__ign; + struct bpf_rb_node_kern *n = (void *)node; - return __bpf_rbtree_add(root, node, (void *)less, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off); + return __bpf_rbtree_add(root, n, (void *)less, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off); } __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_first(struct bpf_rb_root *root) |