diff options
author | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> | 2021-02-26 20:50:26 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2021-03-11 21:19:17 +0300 |
commit | 9a4b99fce659c03699f1cb5003ebe7c57c084d49 (patch) | |
tree | 7f5d448c069f69d96b3f0bad4b6d19ae80509708 /kernel/locking | |
parent | bdb1050ee1faaec1e78c15de8b1959176f26c655 (diff) | |
download | linux-9a4b99fce659c03699f1cb5003ebe7c57c084d49.tar.xz |
kernel/futex: Kill rt_mutex_next_owner()
Update wake_futex_pi() and kill the call altogether. This is possible because:
(i) The case of fixup_owner() in which the pi_mutex was stolen from the
signaled enqueued top-waiter which fails to trylock and doesn't see a
current owner of the rtmutex but needs to acknowledge an non-enqueued
higher priority waiter, which is the other alternative. This used to be
handled by rt_mutex_next_owner(), which guaranteed fixup_pi_state_owner('newowner')
never to be nil. Nowadays the logic is handled by an EAGAIN loop, without
the need of rt_mutex_next_owner(). Specifically:
c1e2f0eaf015 (futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex)
9f5d1c336a10 (futex: Handle transient "ownerless" rtmutex state correctly)
(ii) rt_mutex_next_owner() and rt_mutex_top_waiter() are semantically
equivalent, as of:
c28d62cf52d7 (locking/rtmutex: Handle non enqueued waiters gracefully in remove_waiter())
So instead of keeping the call around, just use the good ole rt_mutex_top_waiter().
No change in semantics.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210226175029.50335-1-dave@stgolabs.net
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 20 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 1 |
2 files changed, 0 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c index 48fff6437901..29f09d0b8224 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -1793,26 +1793,6 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, } /** - * rt_mutex_next_owner - return the next owner of the lock - * - * @lock: the rt lock query - * - * Returns the next owner of the lock or NULL - * - * Caller has to serialize against other accessors to the lock - * itself. - * - * Special API call for PI-futex support - */ -struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock) -{ - if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) - return NULL; - - return rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task; -} - -/** * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() - Wait for lock acquisition * @lock: the rt_mutex we were woken on * @to: the timeout, null if none. hrtimer should already have diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h index ca6fb489007b..a5007f00c1b7 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h @@ -130,7 +130,6 @@ enum rtmutex_chainwalk { /* * PI-futex support (proxy locking functions, etc.): */ -extern struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock); extern void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *proxy_owner); extern void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock); |