summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/sched/rt.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorValentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>2018-09-26 18:12:07 +0300
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2018-11-04 02:59:23 +0300
commit3f130a37c442d5c4d66531b240ebe9abfef426b5 (patch)
tree072f5b007157a6100c6540318875321d6e42480e /kernel/sched/rt.c
parent47b7aee14fd7e453370a5d15dfb11c958ca360f2 (diff)
downloadlinux-3f130a37c442d5c4d66531b240ebe9abfef426b5.tar.xz
sched/fair: Don't increase sd->balance_interval on newidle balance
When load_balance() fails to move some load because of task affinity, we end up increasing sd->balance_interval to delay the next periodic balance in the hopes that next time we look, that annoying pinned task(s) will be gone. However, idle_balance() pays no attention to sd->balance_interval, yet it will still lead to an increase in balance_interval in case of pinned tasks. If we're going through several newidle balances (e.g. we have a periodic task), this can lead to a huge increase of the balance_interval in a very small amount of time. To prevent that, don't increase the balance interval when going through a newidle balance. This is a similar approach to what is done in commit 58b26c4c0257 ("sched: Increment cache_nice_tries only on periodic lb"), where we disregard newidle balance and rely on periodic balance for more stable results. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537974727-30788-2-git-send-email-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched/rt.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions