Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next

Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2020-07-13

The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.

We've added 36 non-merge commits during the last 7 day(s) which contain
a total of 62 files changed, 2242 insertions(+), 468 deletions(-).

The main changes are:

1) Avoid trace_printk warning banner by switching bpf_trace_printk to use
   its own tracing event, from Alan.

2) Better libbpf support on older kernels, from Andrii.

3) Additional AF_XDP stats, from Ciara.

4) build time resolution of BTF IDs, from Jiri.

5) BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_RELEASE hook, from Stanislav.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 44 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index e0b7775039ab..3cc0dcb60ca2 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -11,14 +11,19 @@
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/ctype.h>
 #include <linux/kprobes.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/syscalls.h>
 #include <linux/error-injection.h>
+#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 
 #include "trace_probe.h"
 #include "trace.h"
 
+#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
+#include "bpf_trace.h"
+
 #define bpf_event_rcu_dereference(p)					\
 	rcu_dereference_protected(p, lockdep_is_held(&bpf_event_mutex))
 
@@ -374,6 +379,30 @@ static void bpf_trace_copy_string(char *buf, void *unsafe_ptr, char fmt_ptype,
 	}
 }
 
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(trace_printk_lock);
+
+#define BPF_TRACE_PRINTK_SIZE   1024
+
+static inline __printf(1, 0) int bpf_do_trace_printk(const char *fmt, ...)
+{
+	static char buf[BPF_TRACE_PRINTK_SIZE];
+	unsigned long flags;
+	va_list ap;
+	int ret;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&trace_printk_lock, flags);
+	va_start(ap, fmt);
+	ret = vsnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), fmt, ap);
+	va_end(ap);
+	/* vsnprintf() will not append null for zero-length strings */
+	if (ret == 0)
+		buf[0] = '\0';
+	trace_bpf_trace_printk(buf);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&trace_printk_lock, flags);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Only limited trace_printk() conversion specifiers allowed:
  * %d %i %u %x %ld %li %lu %lx %lld %lli %llu %llx %p %pB %pks %pus %s
@@ -483,8 +512,7 @@ fmt_next:
  */
 #define __BPF_TP_EMIT()	__BPF_ARG3_TP()
 #define __BPF_TP(...)							\
-	__trace_printk(0 /* Fake ip */,					\
-		       fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+	bpf_do_trace_printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 
 #define __BPF_ARG1_TP(...)						\
 	((mod[0] == 2 || (mod[0] == 1 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 64))	\
@@ -521,10 +549,15 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_trace_printk_proto = {
 const struct bpf_func_proto *bpf_get_trace_printk_proto(void)
 {
 	/*
-	 * this program might be calling bpf_trace_printk,
-	 * so allocate per-cpu printk buffers
+	 * This program might be calling bpf_trace_printk,
+	 * so enable the associated bpf_trace/bpf_trace_printk event.
+	 * Repeat this each time as it is possible a user has
+	 * disabled bpf_trace_printk events.  By loading a program
+	 * calling bpf_trace_printk() however the user has expressed
+	 * the intent to see such events.
 	 */
-	trace_printk_init_buffers();
+	if (trace_set_clr_event("bpf_trace", "bpf_trace_printk", 1))
+		pr_warn_ratelimited("could not enable bpf_trace_printk events");
 
 	return &bpf_trace_printk_proto;
 }
@@ -710,7 +743,9 @@ out:
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int bpf_seq_printf_btf_ids[5];
+BTF_ID_LIST(bpf_seq_printf_btf_ids)
+BTF_ID(struct, seq_file)
+
 static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_seq_printf_proto = {
 	.func		= bpf_seq_printf,
 	.gpl_only	= true,
@@ -728,7 +763,9 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_seq_write, struct seq_file *, m, const void *, data, u32, len)
 	return seq_write(m, data, len) ? -EOVERFLOW : 0;
 }
 
-static int bpf_seq_write_btf_ids[5];
+BTF_ID_LIST(bpf_seq_write_btf_ids)
+BTF_ID(struct, seq_file)
+
 static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_seq_write_proto = {
 	.func		= bpf_seq_write,
 	.gpl_only	= true,