diff options
author | Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> | 2022-10-25 21:45:16 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2022-10-26 09:11:46 +0300 |
commit | 271de525e1d7f564e88a9d212c50998b49a54476 (patch) | |
tree | 556578ff32ceed2a81bfc0333a041c5fd789ff5c /kernel | |
parent | f3c51fe02c55bd944662714e5b91b96dc271ad9f (diff) | |
download | linux-271de525e1d7f564e88a9d212c50998b49a54476.tar.xz |
bpf: Remove prog->active check for bpf_lsm and bpf_iter
The commit 64696c40d03c ("bpf: Add __bpf_prog_{enter,exit}_struct_ops for struct_ops trampoline")
removed prog->active check for struct_ops prog. The bpf_lsm
and bpf_iter is also using trampoline. Like struct_ops, the bpf_lsm
and bpf_iter have fixed hooks for the prog to attach. The
kernel does not call the same hook in a recursive way.
This patch also removes the prog->active check for
bpf_lsm and bpf_iter.
A later patch has a test to reproduce the recursion issue
for a sleepable bpf_lsm program.
This patch appends the '_recur' naming to the existing
enter and exit functions that track the prog->active counter.
New __bpf_prog_{enter,exit}[_sleepable] function are
added to skip the prog->active tracking. The '_struct_ops'
version is also removed.
It also moves the decision on picking the enter and exit function to
the new bpf_trampoline_{enter,exit}(). It returns the '_recur' ones
for all tracing progs to use. For bpf_lsm, bpf_iter,
struct_ops (no prog->active tracking after 64696c40d03c), and
bpf_lsm_cgroup (no prog->active tracking after 69fd337a975c7),
it will return the functions that don't track the prog->active.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-2-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 80 |
2 files changed, 70 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 7b373a5e861f..a0b4266196a8 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -5133,13 +5133,14 @@ int kern_sys_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size) run_ctx.bpf_cookie = 0; run_ctx.saved_run_ctx = NULL; - if (!__bpf_prog_enter_sleepable(prog, &run_ctx)) { + if (!__bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur(prog, &run_ctx)) { /* recursion detected */ bpf_prog_put(prog); return -EBUSY; } attr->test.retval = bpf_prog_run(prog, (void *) (long) attr->test.ctx_in); - __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable(prog, 0 /* bpf_prog_run does runtime stats */, &run_ctx); + __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable_recur(prog, 0 /* bpf_prog_run does runtime stats */, + &run_ctx); bpf_prog_put(prog); return 0; #endif diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c index bf0906e1e2b9..d6395215b849 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c @@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ static __always_inline u64 notrace bpf_prog_start_time(void) * [2..MAX_U64] - execute bpf prog and record execution time. * This is start time. */ -u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) +static u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_recur(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) __acquires(RCU) { rcu_read_lock(); @@ -901,7 +901,8 @@ static void notrace update_prog_stats(struct bpf_prog *prog, } } -void notrace __bpf_prog_exit(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) +static void notrace __bpf_prog_exit_recur(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, + struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) __releases(RCU) { bpf_reset_run_ctx(run_ctx->saved_run_ctx); @@ -912,8 +913,8 @@ void notrace __bpf_prog_exit(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, struct bpf_tramp_ rcu_read_unlock(); } -u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_lsm_cgroup(struct bpf_prog *prog, - struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) +static u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_lsm_cgroup(struct bpf_prog *prog, + struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) __acquires(RCU) { /* Runtime stats are exported via actual BPF_LSM_CGROUP @@ -927,8 +928,8 @@ u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_lsm_cgroup(struct bpf_prog *prog, return NO_START_TIME; } -void notrace __bpf_prog_exit_lsm_cgroup(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, - struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) +static void notrace __bpf_prog_exit_lsm_cgroup(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, + struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) __releases(RCU) { bpf_reset_run_ctx(run_ctx->saved_run_ctx); @@ -937,7 +938,8 @@ void notrace __bpf_prog_exit_lsm_cgroup(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, rcu_read_unlock(); } -u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) +u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur(struct bpf_prog *prog, + struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) { rcu_read_lock_trace(); migrate_disable(); @@ -953,8 +955,8 @@ u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_tramp_r return bpf_prog_start_time(); } -void notrace __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, - struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) +void notrace __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable_recur(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, + struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) { bpf_reset_run_ctx(run_ctx->saved_run_ctx); @@ -964,8 +966,30 @@ void notrace __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, rcu_read_unlock_trace(); } -u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_struct_ops(struct bpf_prog *prog, - struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) +static u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable(struct bpf_prog *prog, + struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) +{ + rcu_read_lock_trace(); + migrate_disable(); + might_fault(); + + run_ctx->saved_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx->run_ctx); + + return bpf_prog_start_time(); +} + +static void notrace __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, + struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) +{ + bpf_reset_run_ctx(run_ctx->saved_run_ctx); + + update_prog_stats(prog, start); + migrate_enable(); + rcu_read_unlock_trace(); +} + +static u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter(struct bpf_prog *prog, + struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) __acquires(RCU) { rcu_read_lock(); @@ -976,8 +1000,8 @@ u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_struct_ops(struct bpf_prog *prog, return bpf_prog_start_time(); } -void notrace __bpf_prog_exit_struct_ops(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, - struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) +static void notrace __bpf_prog_exit(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, + struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) __releases(RCU) { bpf_reset_run_ctx(run_ctx->saved_run_ctx); @@ -997,6 +1021,36 @@ void notrace __bpf_tramp_exit(struct bpf_tramp_image *tr) percpu_ref_put(&tr->pcref); } +bpf_trampoline_enter_t bpf_trampoline_enter(const struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ + bool sleepable = prog->aux->sleepable; + + if (bpf_prog_check_recur(prog)) + return sleepable ? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur : + __bpf_prog_enter_recur; + + if (resolve_prog_type(prog) == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM && + prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP) + return __bpf_prog_enter_lsm_cgroup; + + return sleepable ? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable : __bpf_prog_enter; +} + +bpf_trampoline_exit_t bpf_trampoline_exit(const struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ + bool sleepable = prog->aux->sleepable; + + if (bpf_prog_check_recur(prog)) + return sleepable ? __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable_recur : + __bpf_prog_exit_recur; + + if (resolve_prog_type(prog) == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM && + prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP) + return __bpf_prog_exit_lsm_cgroup; + + return sleepable ? __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable : __bpf_prog_exit; +} + int __weak arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *tr, void *image, void *image_end, const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags, |