summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/page-writeback.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>2015-04-21 23:49:13 +0300
committerJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>2015-04-23 19:36:33 +0300
commit464d1387acb94dc43ba772b35242345e3d2ead1b (patch)
treed331377c5d30736d8538dafcdb91709e593bf239 /mm/page-writeback.c
parent2a34c0872adf252f23a6fef2d051a169ac796cef (diff)
downloadlinux-464d1387acb94dc43ba772b35242345e3d2ead1b.tar.xz
writeback: use |1 instead of +1 to protect against div by zero
mm/page-writeback.c has several places where 1 is added to the divisor to prevent division by zero exceptions; however, if the original divisor is equivalent to -1, adding 1 leads to division by zero. There are three places where +1 is used for this purpose - one in pos_ratio_polynom() and two in bdi_position_ratio(). The second one in bdi_position_ratio() actually triggered div-by-zero oops on a machine running a 3.10 kernel. The divisor is x_intercept - bdi_setpoint + 1 == span + 1 span is confirmed to be (u32)-1. It isn't clear how it ended up that but it could be from write bandwidth calculation underflow fixed by c72efb658f7c ("writeback: fix possible underflow in write bandwidth calculation"). At any rate, +1 isn't a proper protection against div-by-zero. This patch converts all +1 protections to |1. Note that bdi_update_dirty_ratelimit() was already using |1 before this patch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/page-writeback.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/page-writeback.c6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 5daf5568b9e1..eb59f7eea508 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint,
long x;
x = div64_s64(((s64)setpoint - (s64)dirty) << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT,
- limit - setpoint + 1);
+ (limit - setpoint) | 1);
pos_ratio = x;
pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ static unsigned long bdi_position_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
* scale global setpoint to bdi's:
* bdi_setpoint = setpoint * bdi_thresh / thresh
*/
- x = div_u64((u64)bdi_thresh << 16, thresh + 1);
+ x = div_u64((u64)bdi_thresh << 16, thresh | 1);
bdi_setpoint = setpoint * (u64)x >> 16;
/*
* Use span=(8*write_bw) in single bdi case as indicated by
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ static unsigned long bdi_position_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
if (bdi_dirty < x_intercept - span / 4) {
pos_ratio = div64_u64(pos_ratio * (x_intercept - bdi_dirty),
- x_intercept - bdi_setpoint + 1);
+ (x_intercept - bdi_setpoint) | 1);
} else
pos_ratio /= 4;