summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/dsa
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>2018-11-23 02:29:05 +0300
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2018-11-24 05:02:23 +0300
commit2b239f678079fd8423c3cd7c5b804abadd2fe898 (patch)
tree9ed6b0ba6edc42735aea520d8d3adfd9362f5ef8 /net/dsa
parentc6fa35b2370aeed280fccbc02ff24b94ab48fcf9 (diff)
downloadlinux-2b239f678079fd8423c3cd7c5b804abadd2fe898.tar.xz
net: dsa: slave: Handle SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD/_DEL
Following patches will change the way of distributing port object changes from a switchdev operation to a switchdev notifier. The switchdev code currently recursively descends through layers of lower devices, eventually calling the op on a front-panel port device. The notifier will instead be sent referencing the bridge port device, which may be a stacking device that's one of front-panel ports uppers, or a completely unrelated device. DSA currently doesn't support any other uppers than bridge. SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB and _PORT_MDB objects are always notified on the bridge port device. Thus the only case that a stacked device could be validly referenced by port object notifications are bridge notifications for VLAN objects added to the bridge itself. But the driver explicitly rejects such notifications in dsa_port_vlan_add(). It is therefore safe to assume that the only interesting case is that the notification is on a front-panel port netdevice. Therefore keep the filtering by dsa_slave_dev_check() in place. To handle SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD and _DEL, subscribe to the blocking notifier chain. Dispatch to rocker_port_obj_add() resp. _del() to maintain the behavior that the switchdev operation based code currently has. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/dsa')
-rw-r--r--net/dsa/slave.c56
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
index 7d0c19e7edcf..d00a0b6d4ce0 100644
--- a/net/dsa/slave.c
+++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
@@ -1557,6 +1557,44 @@ err_fdb_work_init:
return NOTIFY_BAD;
}
+static int
+dsa_slave_switchdev_port_obj_event(unsigned long event,
+ struct net_device *netdev,
+ struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info *port_obj_info)
+{
+ int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ switch (event) {
+ case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD:
+ err = dsa_slave_port_obj_add(netdev, port_obj_info->obj,
+ port_obj_info->trans);
+ break;
+ case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL:
+ err = dsa_slave_port_obj_del(netdev, port_obj_info->obj);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ port_obj_info->handled = true;
+ return notifier_from_errno(err);
+}
+
+static int dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
+ unsigned long event, void *ptr)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev = switchdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
+
+ if (!dsa_slave_dev_check(dev))
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+ switch (event) {
+ case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD: /* fall through */
+ case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL:
+ return dsa_slave_switchdev_port_obj_event(event, dev, ptr);
+ }
+
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+}
+
static struct notifier_block dsa_slave_nb __read_mostly = {
.notifier_call = dsa_slave_netdevice_event,
};
@@ -1565,8 +1603,13 @@ static struct notifier_block dsa_slave_switchdev_notifier = {
.notifier_call = dsa_slave_switchdev_event,
};
+static struct notifier_block dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_notifier = {
+ .notifier_call = dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_event,
+};
+
int dsa_slave_register_notifier(void)
{
+ struct notifier_block *nb;
int err;
err = register_netdevice_notifier(&dsa_slave_nb);
@@ -1577,8 +1620,15 @@ int dsa_slave_register_notifier(void)
if (err)
goto err_switchdev_nb;
+ nb = &dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_notifier;
+ err = register_switchdev_blocking_notifier(nb);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_switchdev_blocking_nb;
+
return 0;
+err_switchdev_blocking_nb:
+ unregister_switchdev_notifier(&dsa_slave_switchdev_notifier);
err_switchdev_nb:
unregister_netdevice_notifier(&dsa_slave_nb);
return err;
@@ -1586,8 +1636,14 @@ err_switchdev_nb:
void dsa_slave_unregister_notifier(void)
{
+ struct notifier_block *nb;
int err;
+ nb = &dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_notifier;
+ err = unregister_switchdev_blocking_notifier(nb);
+ if (err)
+ pr_err("DSA: failed to unregister switchdev blocking notifier (%d)\n", err);
+
err = unregister_switchdev_notifier(&dsa_slave_switchdev_notifier);
if (err)
pr_err("DSA: failed to unregister switchdev notifier (%d)\n", err);