summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/scripts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>2023-05-29 15:46:59 +0300
committerBjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>2023-05-30 00:37:01 +0300
commitc310ca82e229124e7b373125d82ea8fdbf2f9f81 (patch)
treef3ce31a6a84caee9ed9c8447c27e9d59f27639f3 /scripts
parent41e22c2ff38eaea777f1158071539e659aa7980d (diff)
downloadlinux-c310ca82e229124e7b373125d82ea8fdbf2f9f81.tar.xz
arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN). This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs. Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_'). End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels. There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant. Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions