summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/include/linux/rbtree.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMichel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>2019-09-26 02:46:02 +0300
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2019-09-26 03:51:39 +0300
commitc7d4f7eeb6da9408e9ba7475fe2624bdb4d837d0 (patch)
treec5ffd56e31d863a0970be1b1499fc761ec1fc43c /tools/include/linux/rbtree.h
parent0f74914071ab7e7b78731ed62bf350e3a344e0a5 (diff)
downloadlinux-c7d4f7eeb6da9408e9ba7475fe2624bdb4d837d0.tar.xz
rbtree: avoid generating code twice for the cached versions (tools copy)
As was already noted in rbtree.h, the logic to cache rb_first (or rb_last) can easily be implemented externally to the core rbtree api. This commit takes the changes applied to the include/linux/ and lib/ rbtree files in 9f973cb38088 ("lib/rbtree: avoid generating code twice for the cached versions"), and applies these to the tools/include/linux/ and tools/lib/ files as well to keep them synchronized. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190703034812.53002-1-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/include/linux/rbtree.h')
-rw-r--r--tools/include/linux/rbtree.h71
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/tools/include/linux/rbtree.h b/tools/include/linux/rbtree.h
index d83763a5327c..e03b1ea23e0e 100644
--- a/tools/include/linux/rbtree.h
+++ b/tools/include/linux/rbtree.h
@@ -31,25 +31,9 @@ struct rb_root {
struct rb_node *rb_node;
};
-/*
- * Leftmost-cached rbtrees.
- *
- * We do not cache the rightmost node based on footprint
- * size vs number of potential users that could benefit
- * from O(1) rb_last(). Just not worth it, users that want
- * this feature can always implement the logic explicitly.
- * Furthermore, users that want to cache both pointers may
- * find it a bit asymmetric, but that's ok.
- */
-struct rb_root_cached {
- struct rb_root rb_root;
- struct rb_node *rb_leftmost;
-};
-
#define rb_parent(r) ((struct rb_node *)((r)->__rb_parent_color & ~3))
#define RB_ROOT (struct rb_root) { NULL, }
-#define RB_ROOT_CACHED (struct rb_root_cached) { {NULL, }, NULL }
#define rb_entry(ptr, type, member) container_of(ptr, type, member)
#define RB_EMPTY_ROOT(root) (READ_ONCE((root)->rb_node) == NULL)
@@ -71,12 +55,6 @@ extern struct rb_node *rb_prev(const struct rb_node *);
extern struct rb_node *rb_first(const struct rb_root *);
extern struct rb_node *rb_last(const struct rb_root *);
-extern void rb_insert_color_cached(struct rb_node *,
- struct rb_root_cached *, bool);
-extern void rb_erase_cached(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root_cached *);
-/* Same as rb_first(), but O(1) */
-#define rb_first_cached(root) (root)->rb_leftmost
-
/* Postorder iteration - always visit the parent after its children */
extern struct rb_node *rb_first_postorder(const struct rb_root *);
extern struct rb_node *rb_next_postorder(const struct rb_node *);
@@ -84,8 +62,6 @@ extern struct rb_node *rb_next_postorder(const struct rb_node *);
/* Fast replacement of a single node without remove/rebalance/add/rebalance */
extern void rb_replace_node(struct rb_node *victim, struct rb_node *new,
struct rb_root *root);
-extern void rb_replace_node_cached(struct rb_node *victim, struct rb_node *new,
- struct rb_root_cached *root);
static inline void rb_link_node(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_node *parent,
struct rb_node **rb_link)
@@ -129,4 +105,51 @@ static inline void rb_erase_init(struct rb_node *n, struct rb_root *root)
rb_erase(n, root);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(n);
}
+
+/*
+ * Leftmost-cached rbtrees.
+ *
+ * We do not cache the rightmost node based on footprint
+ * size vs number of potential users that could benefit
+ * from O(1) rb_last(). Just not worth it, users that want
+ * this feature can always implement the logic explicitly.
+ * Furthermore, users that want to cache both pointers may
+ * find it a bit asymmetric, but that's ok.
+ */
+struct rb_root_cached {
+ struct rb_root rb_root;
+ struct rb_node *rb_leftmost;
+};
+
+#define RB_ROOT_CACHED (struct rb_root_cached) { {NULL, }, NULL }
+
+/* Same as rb_first(), but O(1) */
+#define rb_first_cached(root) (root)->rb_leftmost
+
+static inline void rb_insert_color_cached(struct rb_node *node,
+ struct rb_root_cached *root,
+ bool leftmost)
+{
+ if (leftmost)
+ root->rb_leftmost = node;
+ rb_insert_color(node, &root->rb_root);
+}
+
+static inline void rb_erase_cached(struct rb_node *node,
+ struct rb_root_cached *root)
+{
+ if (root->rb_leftmost == node)
+ root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);
+ rb_erase(node, &root->rb_root);
+}
+
+static inline void rb_replace_node_cached(struct rb_node *victim,
+ struct rb_node *new,
+ struct rb_root_cached *root)
+{
+ if (root->rb_leftmost == victim)
+ root->rb_leftmost = new;
+ rb_replace_node(victim, new, &root->rb_root);
+}
+
#endif /* __TOOLS_LINUX_PERF_RBTREE_H */