diff options
| author | Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> | 2023-01-28 03:06:33 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2023-01-28 23:30:09 +0300 |
| commit | be6b5c10ecc4014446e5c807d6a69c5a7cc1c497 (patch) | |
| tree | a7569719e03da3a9c27bbf7e1a686aea5e846a64 /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs | |
| parent | 80a611904eef65e8c60e0c8c8f50fa98a0bd0c69 (diff) | |
| download | linux-be6b5c10ecc4014446e5c807d6a69c5a7cc1c497.tar.xz | |
selftests/bpf: Add a sign-extension test for kfuncs
s390x ABI requires the caller to zero- or sign-extend the arguments.
eBPF already deals with zero-extension (by definition of its ABI), but
not with sign-extension.
Add a test to cover that potentially problematic area.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230128000650.1516334-15-iii@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c index f636e50be259..d91c58d06d38 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ #include <vmlinux.h> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +extern long bpf_kfunc_call_test4(signed char a, short b, int c, long d) __ksym; extern int bpf_kfunc_call_test2(struct sock *sk, __u32 a, __u32 b) __ksym; extern __u64 bpf_kfunc_call_test1(struct sock *sk, __u32 a, __u64 b, __u32 c, __u64 d) __ksym; @@ -18,6 +19,23 @@ extern int *bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_rdwr_mem(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p, cons extern int *bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_rdonly_mem(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p, const int rdonly_buf_size) __ksym; SEC("tc") +int kfunc_call_test4(struct __sk_buff *skb) +{ + struct bpf_sock *sk = skb->sk; + long tmp; + + if (!sk) + return -1; + + sk = bpf_sk_fullsock(sk); + if (!sk) + return -1; + + tmp = bpf_kfunc_call_test4(-3, -30, -200, -1000); + return (tmp >> 32) + tmp; +} + +SEC("tc") int kfunc_call_test2(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock *sk = skb->sk; |