Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net

tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
  927cbb478adf ("libbpf: Handle size overflow for ringbuf mmap")
  b486d19a0ab0 ("libbpf: checkpatch: Fixed code alignments in ringbuf.c")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221121122707.44d1446a@canb.auug.org.au/

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

2 files changed, 24 insertions, 20 deletions

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/sk_storage_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/sk_storage_map.c
index 099eb4dfd4f7..18405c3b7cee 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/sk_storage_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/sk_storage_map.c
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static void test_sk_storage_map_basic(void)
 	struct {
 		int cnt;
 		int lock;
-	} value = { .cnt = 0xeB9f, .lock = 0, }, lookup_value;
+	} value = { .cnt = 0xeB9f, .lock = 1, }, lookup_value;
 	struct bpf_map_create_opts bad_xattr;
 	int btf_fd, map_fd, sk_fd, err;
 
@@ -483,38 +483,41 @@ static void test_sk_storage_map_basic(void)
 	      "err:%d errno:%d\n", err, errno);
 	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, &sk_fd, &lookup_value,
 					BPF_F_LOCK);
-	CHECK(err || lookup_value.cnt != value.cnt,
+	CHECK(err || lookup_value.lock || lookup_value.cnt != value.cnt,
 	      "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(BPF_F_LOCK)",
-	      "err:%d errno:%d cnt:%x(%x)\n",
-	      err, errno, lookup_value.cnt, value.cnt);
+	      "err:%d errno:%d lock:%x cnt:%x(%x)\n",
+	      err, errno, lookup_value.lock, lookup_value.cnt, value.cnt);
 
 	/* Bump the cnt and update with BPF_EXIST | BPF_F_LOCK */
 	value.cnt += 1;
+	value.lock = 2;
 	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &sk_fd, &value,
 				  BPF_EXIST | BPF_F_LOCK);
 	CHECK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(BPF_EXIST|BPF_F_LOCK)",
 	      "err:%d errno:%d\n", err, errno);
 	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, &sk_fd, &lookup_value,
 					BPF_F_LOCK);
-	CHECK(err || lookup_value.cnt != value.cnt,
+	CHECK(err || lookup_value.lock || lookup_value.cnt != value.cnt,
 	      "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(BPF_F_LOCK)",
-	      "err:%d errno:%d cnt:%x(%x)\n",
-	      err, errno, lookup_value.cnt, value.cnt);
+	      "err:%d errno:%d lock:%x cnt:%x(%x)\n",
+	      err, errno, lookup_value.lock, lookup_value.cnt, value.cnt);
 
 	/* Bump the cnt and update with BPF_EXIST */
 	value.cnt += 1;
+	value.lock = 2;
 	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &sk_fd, &value, BPF_EXIST);
 	CHECK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(BPF_EXIST)",
 	      "err:%d errno:%d\n", err, errno);
 	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, &sk_fd, &lookup_value,
 					BPF_F_LOCK);
-	CHECK(err || lookup_value.cnt != value.cnt,
+	CHECK(err || lookup_value.lock || lookup_value.cnt != value.cnt,
 	      "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(BPF_F_LOCK)",
-	      "err:%d errno:%d cnt:%x(%x)\n",
-	      err, errno, lookup_value.cnt, value.cnt);
+	      "err:%d errno:%d lock:%x cnt:%x(%x)\n",
+	      err, errno, lookup_value.lock, lookup_value.cnt, value.cnt);
 
 	/* Update with BPF_NOEXIST */
 	value.cnt += 1;
+	value.lock = 2;
 	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &sk_fd, &value,
 				  BPF_NOEXIST | BPF_F_LOCK);
 	CHECK(!err || errno != EEXIST,
@@ -526,22 +529,23 @@ static void test_sk_storage_map_basic(void)
 	value.cnt -= 1;
 	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, &sk_fd, &lookup_value,
 					BPF_F_LOCK);
-	CHECK(err || lookup_value.cnt != value.cnt,
+	CHECK(err || lookup_value.lock || lookup_value.cnt != value.cnt,
 	      "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(BPF_F_LOCK)",
-	      "err:%d errno:%d cnt:%x(%x)\n",
-	      err, errno, lookup_value.cnt, value.cnt);
+	      "err:%d errno:%d lock:%x cnt:%x(%x)\n",
+	      err, errno, lookup_value.lock, lookup_value.cnt, value.cnt);
 
 	/* Bump the cnt again and update with map_flags == 0 */
 	value.cnt += 1;
+	value.lock = 2;
 	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &sk_fd, &value, 0);
 	CHECK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem()", "err:%d errno:%d\n",
 	      err, errno);
 	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, &sk_fd, &lookup_value,
 					BPF_F_LOCK);
-	CHECK(err || lookup_value.cnt != value.cnt,
+	CHECK(err || lookup_value.lock || lookup_value.cnt != value.cnt,
 	      "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(BPF_F_LOCK)",
-	      "err:%d errno:%d cnt:%x(%x)\n",
-	      err, errno, lookup_value.cnt, value.cnt);
+	      "err:%d errno:%d lock:%x cnt:%x(%x)\n",
+	      err, errno, lookup_value.lock, lookup_value.cnt, value.cnt);
 
 	/* Test delete elem */
 	err = bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, &sk_fd);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
index eedbf1937fc4..c6f37e825f11 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -360,10 +360,12 @@ static int get_syms(char ***symsp, size_t *cntp)
 		 * We attach to almost all kernel functions and some of them
 		 * will cause 'suspicious RCU usage' when fprobe is attached
 		 * to them. Filter out the current culprits - arch_cpu_idle
-		 * and rcu_* functions.
+		 * default_idle and rcu_* functions.
 		 */
 		if (!strcmp(name, "arch_cpu_idle"))
 			continue;
+		if (!strcmp(name, "default_idle"))
+			continue;
 		if (!strncmp(name, "rcu_", 4))
 			continue;
 		if (!strcmp(name, "bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func"))
@@ -402,7 +404,7 @@ error:
 	return err;
 }
 
-static void test_bench_attach(void)
+void serial_test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach(void)
 {
 	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_multi_opts, opts);
 	struct kprobe_multi_empty *skel = NULL;
@@ -470,6 +472,4 @@ void test_kprobe_multi_test(void)
 		test_attach_api_syms();
 	if (test__start_subtest("attach_api_fails"))
 		test_attach_api_fails();
-	if (test__start_subtest("bench_attach"))
-		test_bench_attach();
 }